|
|
|
| Comparison of national Innovation System Structure: from the Perspective of Theory and Practice |
| Lei Xiaomiao1,Li Zhengfeng2 |
| （1.School of Marxism, Beihang University, Beijing 100191,China;2.School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Systematic and intuitive innovation system structure is the foundation of scientific and technological innovation research, and the function orientation and interaction of innovation elements are the key to analyzing the operation mechanism of national innovation system. Focusing on the three problems, this paper, through theoretical analysis and international practice, refines the types of national innovation architecture, proposes two different structural frameworks of "ternary series collaboration" and "ternary parallel interaction", and makes a comparative study. The results show that the innovation subjects are the same and the macro innovation logic is the same in different structures, but the number and function of the innovation chains are different, and the dependence on the innovation cooperatives is different. The United States, Germany and other closer to the "ternary parallel interaction" system; Sweden, China and other countries are closer to the "three-way tandem coordination" system. To improve the efficiency of innovation system and solve the problem of "stuck neck", it is necessary to optimize the current innovation architecture or promote the transformation of innovation architecture.
|
|
Received: 02 February 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 薛澜. 承上启下绘出国家创新体系底色[N]. 科技日报,2018-12-18(7).[2] RICHARD R．Nelson: national innovation systems: a comparative analysis[D].Oxford：Oxford University，1993：15-17.[3] 樊春良. 建立全球领先的科学技术创新体系:美国成为世界科技强国之路[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(5):509-519.[4] International Development Research Centre. A decade of reform: science and technology policy in China[R]. Canada: IDRC, 1997.[5] 中华人民共和国国家科学技术委员会,加拿大国际发展研究中心. 十年改革:中国科技政策[M]. 北京:科学技术出版社,1998.[6] LUNDVALL B A.National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning[M]. Pinter Publishers, 1992.[7] 克里斯托夫·弗里曼(Christopher Freeman).技术政策与经济绩效:日本国家创新系统的经验[M]. 张宇轩,译.南京:东南大学出版社,2008.[8] FREEMAN C. Technology and economic performance: lessons from Japan [M]. London: Pinter, 1987.[9] 曾国屏,李正风. 世界各国创新系统:知识的生产、扩散与利用[M]. 济南:山东教育出版社,1999.[10] 路甬祥. 对国家创新体系的再思考[J]. 求是,2002(20):6-8.[11] 吴晓松.国家创新体系与企业创新研究[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.[12] 柳卸林.中国国家创新体系的现状、问题与发展趋势[R].市场经济下国家技术创新体系建设课题报告，1998.[13] 陈芳,万劲波,周城雄. 国家创新体系：转型、建设与治理思路[J]. 科技导报,2020,38(5):13-19.[14] 周毓萍,郭庆. 我国国家创新系统的结构和特点[J]. 科技管理研究,2000,20(4):6-8,25.[15] 石定寰. 国家创新系统:现状与未来[M]. 北京:经济管理出版社,1999.[16] 李旭超. 中美国家创新系统的构成与效率对比研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2018.[17] MOWERY D C. The changing structure of the US national innovation system:implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy[J]. Research Policy,1998,27(6):639-654.[18] 程家怡. 瑞典科技与创新体系的现状与演进过程[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望,2016,31(7):1-8.[19] 贺达水. 北欧国家如何构建国家创新体系[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报,2016,23(10):85-88.[20] 马名杰. 新时期国家创新体系建设重在解决三大核心问题[J]. 中国科技论坛,2018,34(9):1-3.[21] 王春法. 主要发达国家国家创新体系的历史演变与发展趋势[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2003.[22] 胡俊. 新工业革命背景下国家创新系统重构[J]. 未来与发展,2018,42(11):1-3,112.[23] 吴敬琏. 构建有效率的国家创新体系[J]. 中国高新区,2014,14(10):23-24.[24] 陈劲. 关于构建新型国家创新体系的思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(5):479-483.[25] 柳卸林,丁雪辰,高雨辰. 从创新生态系统看中国如何建成世界科技强国[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(3):3-15.[26] 张浩,陈锐. 基于三螺旋理论的瑞典政产学合作模式研究[J]. 科技和产业,2018,18(4):94-99. |
|
|
|
