|
|
|
| Technology Diversification, R&D Collaboration Network Centrality, and Enterprise Innovation Performance |
| Du Yushen1,2,Liu Ziyu1,2 |
| (1.Research Centre for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University,2.Business School, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Using patent data of Chinese ICT field from 2005 to 2018, this paper uses social network analysis method and negative binomial regression model to empirically analyze the impact of technological diversification and R&D collaboration network centrality on enterprise innovation performance and their interaction. It is found that both technology diversification and R&D collaboration network centrality have positive effects on enterprise innovation performance, and the interaction between them can further improve enterprise innovation performance; The interaction between betweenness centrality and technology diversification has the most obvious promoting effect on enterprise innovation performance, but this promoting effect can only exist in the enterprises with high degree of technology diversification. Therefore, enterprises should adopt technology diversification strategy, and take the initiative to select the network location with a high degree of centrality, especially to occupy the shortest path between network members.
|
|
Received: 18 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] CHIU Y-C, LAI H-C, LEE T-Y. Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2008, 75(6):875-892.[2] GARCIA-VEGA M. Does technological diversification promote innovation?: an empirical analysis for european firms[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(2):230-246.[3] 高霞, 其格其, 高群婷. 知识转移效果的结构性指标对企业创新绩效的影响[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(5):89-100.[4] MCEVILY B, ZAHEER A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12):1133-1156.[5] 王核成, 鲁东琴, 裘懿. 技术多元化对企业探索性创新的影响——网络位势的调节效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(14):10-18.[6] PATEL P, PAVITT K. The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(2):141-156.[7] 何郁冰, 陈劲. 技术多元化研究现状探析与整合框架构建[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(1):46-56.[8] CHIU Y, CHIU Y, LAI H. Technological scope: diversified or specialized[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(1):37-58.[9] BRUSONI S, PRENCIPE A, PAVITT K. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(4):597-621.[10] GRANSTRAND O, PATEL P, PAVITT K. Multi-technology corporations: why they have "distributed" rather than "distinctive core" competencies[J]. California Management Review, 1997, 39(4):8-25.[11] 曾德明, 孙佳, 戴海闻. 技术多元化、技术距离与企业二元式创新:以中国汽车产业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(17):61-67.[12] GOMES-CASSERES B, HAGEDOORN J, JAFFE A. Do alliances promote knowledge flows[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 80(1):5-33.[13] 曾德明, 邹思明, 张运生. 网络位置、技术多元化与企业在技术标准制定中的影响力研究[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(2):198-206.[14] FREEMAN L. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1979, 1(3):215-239.[15] MAZZOLA E, PERRONE G. A strategic needs perspective on operations outsourcing and other inter-firm relationships[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(1):256-267.[16] 严子淳, 刘刚, 梁晗. 风险投资人社会网络中心性对新三板企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(4):523-529.[17] 曾德明, 文金艳. 协作研发网络中心度、知识距离对企业二元式创新的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(10):1479-1486.[18] 赵炎, 郑向杰. 网络嵌入性与地域根植性对联盟企业创新绩效的影响——对中国高科技上市公司的实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(11):9-17.[19] 郑向杰, 赵炎. 联盟创新网络中企业嵌入与区域位置对企业知识创造能力影响的实证研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2013, 25(4):20-29, 103.[20] 王永贵, 刘菲. 网络中心性对企业绩效的影响研究——创新关联、政治关联和技术不确定性的调节效应[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2019, 40(5):113-127.[21] IBARRA H, ANDREWS S. Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38(2):277-303.[22] GILBERT M, CORDEY-HAYES M. Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation[J]. Technovation, 1996, 16(6):301-312.[23] COHEN W, LEVINTHAL D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1):128-152.[24] 刘闲月, 林峰, 孙锐. 网络位势对集群企业知识扩散与创新的影响研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012, ，28(6):90-95.[25] GILSING V, NOOTEBOOM B, VANHAVERBEKE W. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: technological distance, betweenness centrality and density[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(10):1717-1731.[26] BELDERBOS R, CASSIMAN B, FAEMS D. Co-ownership of intellectual property: exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5):841-852.[27] 江诗松, 何文龙, 路江涌. 创新作为一种政治战略:转型经济情境中的企业象征性创新[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(2):104-113.[28] 周煊, 程立茹, 王皓. 技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗?——基于16年中国制药上市公司专利申请数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2012,55(8):166-179.[29] 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73.[30] HUANG Y, CHEN C. The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(7):420-428.[31] 耿合江. 知识获取视角下互惠性与自利性企业文化对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(13):135-140.[32] 陈建军, 王正沛, 李国鑫. 中国宇航企业组织结构与创新绩效:动态能力和创新氛围的中介效应[J]. 中国软科学, 2018,33(11):122-130.[33] 赵炎, 王冰, 郑向杰. 联盟创新网络中企业的地理邻近性、区域位置与网络结构特征对创新绩效的影响——基于中国通讯设备行业的实证分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(1):124-131.[34] 赵炎, 郭霞婉. 结构洞度对联盟网络中企业创新绩效的影响研究——基于中国家用视听设备制造业企业联盟网络[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(17):76-81.[35] BRESCHI S, LISSONI F, MALERBA F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(1):69-87.[36] SUZUKI J, KODAMA F. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in japan: two case studies of large japanese firms[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(3):531-549. |
|
|
|
