|
|
The Effect of Sleeping Knowledge on Enterprises Technological Innovation Sustainability:A Moderated Mediation Model |
Sun Bing,Yang Xueting |
(Department of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001,China) |
|
|
Abstract Sleeping knowledge is an significant approach to the continuous technological innovation of enterprises in the era of knowledge economy.In order to open the black box of the relation between different kinds of sleeping knowledge and technological innovation sustainability, the paper constructs a moderated mediation to propose the research hypothesis between sleeping knowledge and technological innovation sustainability with introducing resource bricolage mechanism as mediating variable and knowledge governance as moderator variable.Based on the data of the questionnaire, the research shows that both explicit sleeping knowledge and implicit sleeping knowledge have a negative effect on technological innovation sustainability.Resource bricolage works as an intermediary role in this process.Knowledge governance mechanism has a negative regulation on the relationship between implicit sleeping knowledge and technological innovation sustainability, and it has an inverse ‘U’-type moderation on the mediating effect of resource bricolage between both kinds of sleeping knowledge and technological innovation sustainability.
|
Received: 30 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] CLAUSEN T, POHJOLA M, SAPPRASERT K, et al.Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation[J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2012, 21(3): 553-585.[2] TAVASSOLI S, KARLSSON C.Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained[J].Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1887-1901.[3] 梁祺, 雷星晖, 苏涛永.知识治理研究综述[J].情报杂志, 2012, 31(12): 74-80.[4] 徐建中, 李奉书, 李丽, 等.企业外部关系质量对低碳技术创新的影响: 基于知识视角的研究[J].中国软科学, 2017,32(2): 183-192.[5] 肖灵机, 汪明月, 万玲.经济新常态下我国新兴产业创新发展路径研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(22): 67-71.[6] 葛秋萍,余青.知识转移效用下沉睡知识激活的障碍因素研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(15):139-142.[7] 王进富,黄涛,张颖颖.创业警觉、资源拼凑对破坏性创新的影响——公司创业情境单案例扎根研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(14): 102-109.[8] 周飞, 沙振权, 孙锐.市场导向、资源拼凑与商业模式创新的关系研究[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(1):113-120.[9] 周飞, 钟泓琳, 林一帆.外部创新知识搜寻、资源拼凑与双向开放式创新的关系[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(8): 23-30.[10] 胡海青,刘宁,张丹.以资源拼凑为中介的在孵企业洞察能力与创业绩效的关系研究[J].预测, 2020, 39(4): 16-23.[11] WU L, LIU H, ZHANG J.Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity:the moderating role of technological turbulence[J].Journal of Business Research, 2017, 70: 127-135.[12] 王海花, 谢萍萍, 熊丽君.创业网络、资源拼凑与新创企业绩效的关系研究[J].管理科学, 2019, 32(2): 50-66.[13] 张敏.资源拼凑会抑制企业家精神吗——基于环境不确定及政商关系的调节效应检验[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(5): 886-894.[14] AN W, ZHANG J, YOU C, et al.Entrepreneur's creativity and firm-level innovation performance:bricolage as a mediator[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2018, 30(7): 838-851.[15] 郑少芳, 唐方成.高科技企业创新生态系统的知识治理机制[J].中国科技论坛, 2018,34(1): 47-57.[16] 陈莉平, 王小青, 张均燕.产业集群开放式创新中的知识治理机制研究[J].物流工程与管理, 2019, 41(7): 144-146,180.[17] 郑少芳, 唐方成.高科技企业创新生态系统的知识治理机制[J].中国科技论坛, 2018,34(1): 47-57.[18] 曹勇, 向阳.知识治理对知识共享与员工创新行为的影响研究[J].情报杂志, 2013, 32(5):202-207.[19] FOSS N J.The emerging knowledge governance approach: challenges and characteristics[J].Organization, 2007, 14(1): 29-52.[20] 张生太, 王亚洲, 张永云, 等.知识治理对个体知识共享行为影响的跨层次分析[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(2): 133-144.[21] 杨勇勇, 石文典, 宋有明.知识治理机制与知识共享敌意的关系: 员工关系的中介作用[J].心理科学, 2018, 41(6): 1450-1456.[22] 何郁冰, 周慧, 丁嘉敏.技术多元化如何影响企业的持续创新[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(12): 1896-1909.[23] 夏俊, 程艳霞.湖北高新产业持续性技术创新瓶颈与对策[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,25(6):888-892.[24] 杨爱华, 高嘉社.我国中小企业技术创新的持续性分析[J].科技进步与对策, 2004,31(2): 74-76.[25] MACHLUP F.An economic review of the patent system[J].Study No.15 of the United States Sub-Committee on Patent, Trademarks and Copyright's US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1958, 12:123-167.[26] 葛秋萍, 董伟, 葛琛辉.沉睡知识激活的组织结构与流程再造问题研究[J].情报杂志, 2014, 33(11): 199-202+207.[27] 杨柯, 闻华.知识创造的SECI模型和知识螺旋[J].财经界(管理学家), 2008,3(11):70-74.[28] JUAN A M, MARIA E R, AMPARO S,et al.The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2009, 67(6): 712-735.[29] ANTONELLI C, CRESPI F, SCELLATO G.Inside innovation persistence: new evidence from italian micro-data[J].Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 2012, 23(4): 341-353.[30] BAKER T, MINER A S, EESLEY D T.Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process[J].Research Policy, 2003, 32(2): 255-276.[31] BAKER T, NELSON R E.Creating something from nothing:resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(3): 329-366.[32] 芮华勤.沉睡性创新知识的产生机制研究[J].黑龙江科技信息, 2016,20(6): 128-130.[33] 宋晶, 陈劲.创业者社会网络、组织合法性与创业企业资源拼凑[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(1): 86-94.[34] 陆媛.企业的知识转移与知识转化辨析[J].商业现代化, 2008,47(4): 43-44.[35] 何郁冰, 张思.技术创新持续性对企业绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2017, 38(9): 1-11.[36] 孙冰, 田胜男, 姚洪涛.创新网络的小世界效应如何影响突围性技术扩散—基于转换成本的调节作用[J].管理评论, 2018, 30(3): 72-81, 127.[37] 赵兴庐, 张建琦, 刘衡.能力建构视角下资源拼凑对新创企业绩效的影响过程研究[J].管理学报, 2016, 13(10): 1518-1524.[38] 张同健, 蒲勇健.互惠性偏好、隐性知识转化与技术创新能力的相关性研究——基于研发型团队的数据检验[J].管理评论, 2010, 22(10): 100-106.[39] 林海芬, 苏敬勤.管理创新过程效力提升机理探析:基于知识治理视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2010, 27(8): 1-6.[40] CHOI C J, CHENG P, HILTON B,et al.Knowledge governance[J].Journal of Knowledge Management, 2005, 6: 67-74.[41] 姜伟, 张杰.中国乡镇企业管理百科全书[M].北京:农业出版社, 1987, 23.[42] MANSOOREH Z, MOJTABA S, MUHAMMAD A.A systematic review of knowledge sharing challenges and practices in global software development[J].International Journal of Information Management, 2016, 36(6): 995-1019.[43] SENYARD J, BAKER T, STEFFENS P, et al.Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2): 212-230.[44] GOODEHAM P, MINBAEVA D B, PEDERSEN T.Governance mechanisms for the promotion of social capital for knowledge transfer in multinational corporations[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(1): 123-150.[45] BARON R M, KENNY D A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.[46] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620. |
|
|
|