|
|
|
| Research on the Relationship between Niche Suitability of Innovation System and Economic High-quality Development |
| Liu Hedong,Chen Jie |
| (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper uses innovation capability as an intermediary variable to analyze the influence mechanism of niche suitability on high-quality economic development, constructs a threshold effect model, and collects relevant data on the niche suitability、innovation capability of innovation systems, economic high quality development in 30 provinces and municipalities in my country from 2009 to 2018, accurately measures the niche suitability and its impact on high-quality economic development through innovation, and uses Arcgis software to visualize the niche suitability.Finding that:①There is regional imbalance in the suitability of the innovation ecosystem, which is characterized by high in the east and low in the west, high in the coast and low in the inland.The Matthew effect is significant, and some central and western provinces and cities have made significant progress.②The characteristics of agglomeration of innovation niche suitability are obvious, which can be divided into four sections: "three pillars", "Yangtze River Delta-dominant", "central-dominant", and "western-dominant".③Niche fitness has a double threshold effect on innovation ability and high-quality economic development, and the impact effect increases marginally.
|
|
Received: 20 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] COOKE P,HANS J,BRAZYK H J,et al.Regional innovation systems: the role of governance in the globalized world[M].London:UCL press,1996.[2] GIBSON D V, FOSS L, HODGSON R. Institutional perspectives in innovation ecosystem development[M]//Moderne Konzepte des organisationalen marketing. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2014: 61-75.[3] LEYDESDORFF L, ETZKOWITZ H.Can"'the public" be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations?report on the fourth triple helix conference[J].Science and Public Policy,2003,30(1):55-61.[4] FODDI M,USAI S.Regional knowledge performance in Europe[J].Growth and Change,2013,44(2):258-286.[5] 孙丽文,李跃.京津冀区域创新生态系统生态位适宜度评价[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(4):47-53.[6] 张贵,吕长青.基于生态位适宜度的区域创新生态系统与创新效率研究[J].工业技术经济,2017, 36(10):12-21.[7] 雷雨嫣,陈关聚,刘启雷.高技术产业创新生态系统的创新生态位适宜度及演化[J].系统工程,2018,36(2):103-111.[8] 刘钒,张君宇,邓明亮.基于改进生态位适宜度模型的区域创新生态系统健康评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(16):1-10.[9] 吴菲菲,童奕铭,黄鲁成.中国高技术产业创新生态系统有机性评价——创新四螺旋视角[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(5):67-76.[10] 李金昌,史龙梅,徐蔼婷.高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J].统计研究,2019,36(1):4-14.[11] 任晓燕,杨水利.技术创新、产业结构升级与经济高质量发展——基于独立效应和协同效应的测度分析[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(11):72-80.[12] 刘和东,刘童.区域创新驱动与经济高质量发展耦合协调度研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(16):64-71.[13] 刘洪久,胡彦蓉,马卫民.区域创新生态系统适宜度与经济发展的关系研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S2):764-770.[14] 刘钒,向叙昭,吴晓烨.面向高质量发展的创新生态系统治理研究[J].社会科学动态,2020，43(8):41-46.[15] 甄美荣,江晓壮,杨晶照.国家级高新区创新生态系统适宜度与经济绩效测度[J].统计与决策,2020,36(13):67-72.[16] CZARNITZKI D,LICHT G.Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy:the case of eastern Germany[J].Economics of Transition,2006,14(1):101-131[17] 张成岗,李佩.科技支撑社会治理体系构建中的公众参与:从松弛主义到行动主义[J].江苏行政学院学校,2020，20(5):69-75.[18] HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation, testing, and inference[J].Journal of Ehqnometrics,1999,93(2):345-368. |
|
|
|
