|
|
|
| Research on Coupling Coordination Degree between Innovation-driven and High-quality Economic Development |
| Liu Hedong,Liu Tong |
| (College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Tech University，Nanjing 210009，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper collects the relevant data of innovation and economy of 30 provinces and cities in China from 2005 to 2018.Through the analysis of the coupling mechanism between innovation-driven and high-quality economic development.The coupling and coordination evaluation model of regional innovation drive and high-quality economic development is constructed.The degree of coupling coordination is measured accurately and analyzed visually.Find that :Firstly,the innovation-driven and high-quality comprehensive development level of the economy in all provinces and cities is on the rise,but the innovation-driven advanced economy is on the rise of high-quality development level; Secondly,in terms of time sequence,the degree of coupling and coordination of various provinces and cities has been greatly improved,but the speed of promotion is obviously different,and most of them are in the stage of moderate coupling and coordination; Thirdly,in terms of spatial distribution,the degree of coupling coordination between provinces and cities presents the characteristics of "high in the east and low in the west,high in the coastal areas and low in the inland areas".Based on this,the paper puts forward some policy suggestions to effectively promote innovation-driven and high-quality economic development.
|
|
Received: 23 February 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]PERROUX F.Economic space:theory and application[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1950,64(1):89-104.[2]SOLOW R W.Technical change and the aggregate production function[J].Review of Economics & Statistics,1957,39(3):554-562.[3]ROMER P.Endogenous technological change[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990(98):71-102.[4]SEFER S,ERCAN S.The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2011,24:815-828.[5]杨恺钧,闵崇智.技术创新对经济增长质量的驱动作用研究——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J].当代经济管理,2019,41(12):29-37.[6]崔有祥,胡兴华，等.实施创新驱动发展战略测量评估体系研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(12):309-316.[7]裴小革.论创新驱动——马克思主义政治经济学的分析视角[J].经济研究,2016,51(6):17-29.[8]辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁,等.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018(10):9-18.[9]王希元.创新驱动产业结构升级的制度基础——基于门槛模型的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(12):1-9.[10]郑威,陆远权.创新驱动对产业结构升级的溢出效应及其衰减边界[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019(11):1-16.[11]HALL B H,J LERNER.The financing of R&D and innovation[J].Handbook of the Economics of Innovation,2010(1):609-639.[12]张玉喜,赵丽丽.中国科技金融投入对科技创新的作用效果[J].科学学研究，2015，32(2):177-184.[13]杨明海,张红霞,孙亚男,等.中国八大综合经济区科技创新能力的区域差距及其影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(4):3-19.[14]徐国祥,陈燃萍.创新驱动转型发展能力的影响因素分析——基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J].数理统计与管理,2019(6):1-15.[15]张济建,尹星,关承龙,等.金融状况与战略性新兴产业技术创新——以新能源产业为例[J].南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2019(5):102-110.[16]何风琴,邹奥博.长江经济带的经济发展促进了区域科技创新吗[J].江苏社会科学,2019(1):77-84.[17]钟腾,汪昌云.金融发展与企业创新产出——基于不同融资模式对比视角[J].金融研究,2017(12):127-142.[18]李强,韦薇.长江经济带经济增长质量与生态环境优化耦合协调度研究[J].软科学,2019,33(5):117-122.[19]祝影,王飞.基于耦合理论的中国省域创新驱动发展评价研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(10):1509-1517.[20]李二玲,崔之珍.中国区域创新能力与经济发展水平的耦合协调分析[J].地理科学,2018,38(9):1412-1421.[21]华坚,胡金昕.中国区域科技创新与经济高质量发展耦合关系评价[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(29):2-9. |
|
|
|
