|
|
|
| Knowledge Creation Performance, Knowledge Transfer and New Knowledge Creation Performance:Moderation Pathsof Inter-firm Relational Quality |
| Li Dan1,Yang Jianjun2,Zhao Lu3 |
| （1.School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an 710048,China ；2.School of Management, Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710049 ,China；3.Shaanxi Aerospace Construction Group Co.,LTD , Xi'an 710014 ,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This research combines the theory of knowledge-based with the theory of knowledge transfer, and put forward the function paths of knowledge base compatibility on knowledge creation through knowledge transfer.Further, introduce the embeddedness theory and absorptive capacity theory, and analyze the indirect moderation of relational quality on theknowledge base compatibility，knowledge transfer and knowledge creative performance through internal ability of enterprise.Drawing on 239 Chinese firms from the manufacture and high-tech enterprises, the main results show that:the knowledge base compatibility positively influence enterprises new knowledge creation performance throughknowledge transfer; Economic relationship quality strengthen the relationship between knowledge base compatible andknowledge transfer; Social relationship quality strengthenthe relationship betweenknowledge transfer and new knowledge creation performance; Economic relationship qualityindirectly strengthen the relationship between knowledge base compatible and component knowledge transfer through potential absorptive capability.
|
|
Received: 03 September 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 蒋楠, 赵嵩正.知识连接, 知识距离与知识共创关系研究[J].情报科学, 2016, 34(6):138-142.[2] HO H, GANESAN S.Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in coopetition? the role of customer participation[J].Journal of Marketing, 2013, 77(6):91-107.[3] 高安刚,张林.知识异质性视角下产业跨空间协同创新的理论框架:条件、动力与路径[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(11):168-175.[4] 吴言波,邵云飞,殷俊杰.战略联盟知识异质性对焦点企业突破性创新的影响研究[J].管理学报,2019,16(4):541-549.[5] HAN J, JO G S, KANG J.Is high-quality knowledge always beneficial? knowledge overlap and innovation performance in technological mergers and acquisitions[J].Journal of Management & Organization, 2018, 24(2):258-278.[6] 王伟光, 冯荣凯, 尹博.产业创新网络中核心企业控制力能够促进知识溢出吗[J].管理世界, 2015, 6:99-109.[7] ZE R, KUN Z, BOADU F, et al.The effects of boundary-spanning search, network ties, and absorptive capacity for innovation:a moderated mediation examination[J].Sustainability, 2018, 10(11):3980.[8] 朱振中, 吕廷杰.兼容性经济学研究的发展[J].中国工业经济, 2004 (9):12-19.[9] BLOODGOOD J M.Acquiring external knowledge:how much overlap is best[J].Knowledge and Process Management, 2015, 22(3):148-156.[10] KAVUSAN K, NOORDERHAVEN N G, DUYSTERS G M.Knowledge acquisition and complementary specialization in alliances:the impact of technological overlap and alliance experience[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(10):2153-2165.[11] SEARS J, HOETKER G.Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(1):48-67.[12] YOUNG J A, PELTON L E.Strategic alliances:are they relational by definition [J].Indiana:Indiana State University, 2000.[13] SMITH J B, BARCLAY D W.The effects of organizational differences and trust of the effectiveness relationship [J].Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(1):3-21．[14] 刘婷, 王震.关系投入, 治理机制, 公平与知识转移:依赖的调节效应[J].管理科学, 2016, 29(4):115-124.[15] GULATI R.Does familiarity breed trust? the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1):85-112.[16] LIAO Z, LONG S.Can interfirm trust improve firms' cooperation on environmental innovation? the moderating role of environmental hostility[J].Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019, 28(1):198-205.[17] 郭淑芬,郭金花,李晓琪.合作创新质量、知识吸收能力与企业创新绩效——基于太原高新区科技型中小企业的实证研究[J].南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2017,16(3):89-99.[18] FISHER G J, QUALLS W J.A framework of interfirm open innovation:relationship and knowledge based perspectives[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2018, 33(2):240-250.[19] 谢恩, 梁杰.中外企业间差异对知识转移的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(2):44-51.[20] YAYAVARAM S, AHUJA G.Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge- basemalleability[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008,53(2):333-362.[21] 杨栩, 肖蘅, 廖姗.知识转移渠道对知识转移的作用机制——知识粘性前因的中介作用和治理机制的调节作用[J].管理评论, 2014 (9):89-99.[22] LANE P J, LUBATKIN M.Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizationallearning[J].Strategic management journal, 1998:461-477.[23] 姚艳虹,孙芳琦,陈俊辉.知识结构、环境波动对突破式创新的影响——知识动态能力的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(10):1-8.[24] 魏旭光, 康凯, 张志颖，等.生产型企业间信任对合作满意度的影响研究——关系专用性投资的中介作用[J].预测, 2013 (2):42-48.[25] 钱丽萍, 高伟, 任星耀.供应商专项投资对经销商长期导向的影响[J].管理评论, 2014 (6):163-176.[26] FUENTELSAZ L, GóMEZ J.Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(5):477-499.[27] HUBER G P, LEWIS K.Cross-understanding:implications for group cognition and performance[J].Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(1):6-26.[28] 郭岚, 张祥建.基于网络外部性的价值模块整合与兼容性选择[J].中国工业经济, 2005 (4):103-110.[29] ZAHRA S A, GEORGE G.Absorptive capacity:a review, reconceptualization, and extension[J].Academy of management review, 2002, 27(2):185-203.[30] 梁娟, 陈国宏.多重网络嵌入与集群企业知识创造绩效研究[J].科学学研究, 2015 (1):90-97.[31] ZHANG H, SHU C, JIANG X, et al.Managing knowledge for innovation:the role of cooperation, competition, and alliance nationality[J].Journal of International Marketing, 2010, 18(4):74-94.[32] PéREZ-NORDTVEDT L, KEDIA B L, DATTA D K, et al.Effectiveness and efficiency of crosscrosscrosscrossross:the role of cooperaexamination[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(4):714-744.[33] JANSEN J J P, VAN DEN BOSCH F A J, VOLBERDA H W.Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity:how do organizational antecedents matter?[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(6):999-1015.[34] 陈宇科,刘蓝天.环境规制强度、企业规模对技术创新质量的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(16):84-90.[35] 罗洪云, 张庆普.知识管理视角下新创科技型小企业突破性技术创新能力评价指标体系构建及测度[J].运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1).[36] 王明益.外资异质性、行业差异与东道国技术进步——基于制造业分行业的全参数与半参数估计比较[J].财经研究,2014,40(9):109-120. |
|
|
|
