|
|
|
| Impacts of Multi-level Network Embedding on Inventor's Ambidextrous Innovation |
| Mao Jianqi1,2,Hao Cunhao1,Liu Na1,2 |
| （1.School of Business Administration, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005,China;2.Shandong Collaborative Innovation Center of Energy Economy, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The inventor's innovation activities embeds in knowledge network and social network. From the perspective of multi-network, this paper explores the impacts of the structure features of cross-layer network on inventors' innovation using patent data applied by Huawei and Apple in the USPTO from 2002 to 2017 and negative binomial regression models. Results show that both inventor's cross-layer cohesiveness and cross-layer connectivity have inverted U-shaped impact on ambidextrous innovation performance. Inventor's affiliate degree strengthens the above inverted U-shaped relationships. This study makes up the current research that investigated functional mechanism of innovation network from a single level;it also plays a certain role in guiding the innovators to build selves innovation network.
|
|
Received: 01 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘娜. 纳米能源的复杂创新网络研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2017. [2]李守伟, 朱瑶. 合作创新网络结构特征对企业创新绩效的影响研究——以新能源汽车产业为例[J]. 工业技术经济, 2016,35(11):137-144. [3]GUAN J, LIU N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: a patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy, 2016,45(1):97-112. [4]李健, 余悦. 合作网络结构洞、知识网络凝聚性与探索式创新绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018,21(6):121-130. [5]徐露允, 曾德明, 张运生. 知识网络密度与双元创新绩效关系研究——基于知识基础多元度的调节效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018,30(1):72-80. [6]张晓黎, 覃正. 知识与合作网络结构洞对技术创新绩效的影响[J]. 软科学, 2013,27(12):58-62. [7]辛德强, 党兴华, 薛超凯. 双重嵌入下网络惯例刚性对探索性创新的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018,35(4):10-15. [8]CHUNLEI W,RODAN S,FRUIN M.Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(2):484-514. [9]LOMI A,ROBINS G,TRANMER M.Introduction to multilevel social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2016(44):266-268.[10] MARCH J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.[11]BENNER,TUSHMAN.Exploitation,exploration,and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003,2(28):238-256.[12] 刘娜,武宪云,毛荐其.发明者自我网络动态对知识搜索的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2019,37(4):689-700.[13]DUYSTERS G,LEMMENS C.Alliance group formation: enabling and constraining effects of embeddedness and social capital in strategic technology alliance networks[J]. International Studies of Management & Organization, 2003,2(33):49-68.[14]YAYAVARAM S,AHUJA G.Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53(2):333-362.[15]LOWIK S,ROSSUM D V,KRAAIJENBRINK J. Strong ties as sources of new knowledge: how small firms innovate through bridging capabilities[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2012,50(2):239-256.[16]刘娜,毛荐其,余光胜.技术会聚探析与展望[J]. 科研管理, 2017,38(12):20-28.[17]WAGNER M.To explore or to exploit? an empirical investigation of acquisitions by large incumbents[J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(9):1217-1225.[18]LE BLOND S, GUILLAUME J L, LATAPY M. Clustering in P2P exchanges and consequences on performances[C]//International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005: 193-204. [19]LATAPY M, MAGNIEN C, VECCHIO N D. Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks[J]. Social Networks, 2008,30(1):31-48.[20]BORGATTI S P, HALIGN D S. Analyzing affiliation networks[J]. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 2011,1:417-433. |
|
|
|
