|
|
|
| An Analysis of the Mechanism of Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy Promoting Economic Growth |
| Qi Yong1,2,Wang Jiawen1,Zhou Xing1 |
| （1.School of Economic & Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology；2.School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094，China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Mass entrepreneurship and innovation is one of the two engines of the economic development, which is the source of the power of high-quality development of the economy, and the dual-innovation policy plays an important role in the development of the two-generation. At present, the implementation of the dual-innovation policy in our country is not high, the coverage of the policy is not wide, the protection of intellectual property is not enough, the investment and financing system of the enterprise needs to be perfected and the lack of funds and talents, and the cultivation and development of the new growth point of the economy are hindered. In this paper, the paper studies the influence of the two-innovation policy on the economic growth, puts forward the research hypothesis of the influence of the two-innovation policy on the economic growth, and constructs the mechanism model of the influence of the two-innovation policy on the economic growth, which is based on the structural formula .An empirical analysis is carried out. The study finds that the two-generation policy has a significant direct effect on economic growth, while the indirect effect of the two-created main body on economic growth is also significant, and the impact of the two-generation environment on economic growth is not significant. Finally, it is proposed to perfect the system of the two-generation policy and to promote the economic growth.
|
|
Received: 22 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] ROTHWELL R. Reindustrialization and technology: towards a national policy framework[J]. Science and Public Policy, 1985, 12(3):113-130.[2] LOOMIS J, HELFAND G . Environmental policy analysis for decision making[M]. Springer Netherlands, 2001.[3] 刘凤朝, 孙玉涛. 我国科技政策向创新政策演变的过程、趋势与建议——基于我国289项创新政策的实证分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2007(5).[4] 彭纪生, 仲为国, 孙文祥. 政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效：基于创新政策的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2008(9):25-36.[5] FREITAS I M B, TUNZELMANN N V. Mapping public support for innovation: a comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(9):1446-1464.[6] 纪玉山, 吴勇民. 科技创新促进经济增长的微观机理与政策选择[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2007(5).[7] 吴翌琳,黄筝.基于倾向得分匹配法的创业政策实证研究——以财税政策评估为例[J].宏观经济研究,2018(9):123-138+175.[8] ACS Z J, SZERB L . Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy[J]. Small Business Economics, 2007, 28(2-3):109-122.[9] ACS Z J, HESSELS D J. Special issue: entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions / entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions[J]. Small Business Economics, 2008, 31(3):219-234. [10] 方世建, 桂玲. 创业政策视角下创业和经济增长的关系[J]. 经济管理, 2009(5):161-166.[11] 王宝顺. 创业、经济增长与税收政策[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2017(3).[12] 杨静怡. 科技政策聚集对科技企业创新创业影响研究[D]. 北京：北京理工大学, 2014.[13] 常忠义. 区域创新创业政策支持体系研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2008, 23(6):45-47.[14] 徐德英, 韩伯棠. 政策供需匹配模型构建及实证研究——以北京市创新创业政策为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(12).[15] 李霞, 戴胜利, 肖泽磊. 基于“政策-规范-认知”模型的大学生创新创业制度研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016(3):72-78.[16] 孙玉坤. 中国经济发展转型与高层次应用型人才培养[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2012(2):110-112+137.[17] 曾春媛, 刘青青, 王锦,等. 科技投入与区域经济发展水平协调性研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013(S1):203-210.[18] 高伟, 高建, 李纪珍. 创业政策对城市创业的影响路径——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 技术经济, 2018, 364(4):71-78.[19] 魏下海, 董志强, 张永璟. 营商制度环境为何如此重要？——自民营企业家“内治外攘”的经验证据[J]. 经济科学, 2015, 37(2):105-116.[20] 朱春奎. 依托技术创新促进经济增长方式转变的政策取向[J]. 中国行政管理, 1997(10).[21] 段琪, 麦晴峰, 汪波,等. 基于扎根理论的高校科技创业生态系统研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(11).[22] 李健, 高杨, 李祥飞. 政策工具视域下中国低碳政策分析框架研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(21):112-117.[23] 彭正霞, 陆根书, 康卉. 个体和社会环境因素对大学生创业意向的影响[J]. 高等工程教育研究,2012（4）.[24] 辛士波, 陈妍, 张宸. 结构方程模型理论的应用研究成果综述[J]. 工业技术经济, 2014(5). |
|
|
|
