|
|
|
| Development Trend of Basic Research Competitiveness of Marine Strategic Emerging Industries |
| Zhang Yi,Meng Feirong |
| (School of Management, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper takes Marine biological medicine industry as the research sample, and adopts the research methods of Bibliometrics and basic research competitiveness indexes to investigate the overall development status of the basic research field of Marine biological medicine as well as the basic research competitiveness of the major countries. The research findings show that the basic research field of Marine biological medicine experienced three stages and has attracted extensive attention from many countries in the world, and the United States has become an important research center in this field. The basic research field of Marine strategic emerging industries is an interdisciplinary research field with broad extension, among which the universities and research institutions are the main forces, and their research findings are published in the important SCI journals（Quartiles 1 or 2）from the research fields of chemistry, medicine and biology. In addition, the growing trend of the active status of China in the Marine biological medicine research field is remarkable and the gap with the four benchmark countries (the United States, Japan, Spain and the United Kingdom) is narrowing. However, China's research publications are still suffering from a low impact, and the matching degree between publications and citations in China lags far behind that in the developed countries such as the United States, Japan, United Kingdom and Spain, indicating that China would take a long time to catch up with them. In summary, this study has some practical significances as it is conducive to deepening our understanding on the situation of basic research competitiveness of main countries and clarifying the gap between China and powerful maritime nations in this field.
|
|
Received: 06 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]黄盛, 周俊禹. 我国海洋生物医药产业集聚发展的对策研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2015 (7): 44-47[2] 柳卸林, 何郁冰. 基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉[J]. 中国软科学, 2011(4): 104-117.[3] 张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙. 产学研合作与后发国家创新主体能力演变——以中国高铁产业为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(10): 227-244.[4] 于会娟, 姜秉国. 海洋战略性新兴产业的发展思路与策略选择——基于产业经济技术特征的分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2016(7): 106-111.[5] 国家知识产权局规划发展司. 海洋生物药物技术专利态势分析报告[R]. 北京: 国家知识产权局, 2015.[6] 张艺, 朱桂龙, 陈凯华. 产学研合作国际研究:研究现状与知识基础[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(9): 62-70.[7] ZHANG Y, KOU M, CHEN K, et al. Modelling the basic research competitiveness index (BR-CI) with an application to the biomass energy field [J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(3): 1221-1241.[8] RINIA E J, VAN LEEUWEN T N, VAN VUREN H G, et al. Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands [J]. Research Policy, 1998, 27(1): 95-107.[9] BRAUN T,SCHUBERT A.A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 1980-1999 [J]. Scientometrics, 2003,58(1): 183-189. [10]仲雯雯. 国内外战略性海洋新兴产业发展的比较与借鉴[J]. 中国海洋大学学报：社会科学版, 2013, (3): 12-16.[11] 付秀梅, 陈倩雯, 王东亚, 等. 我国海洋生物医药研究成果产业化国际合作机制研究[J]. 太平洋学报, 2015, 23(12): 93-102.[12] KAMIMURA H, YAMAMOTO I. Studies on nicotinoids as insecticides [J]. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1963, 27(6): 450-453.[13] 仲雯雯. 我国战略性海洋新兴产业发展政策研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2011.[14] SYNOLD T W, DUSSAULT I, FORMAN B M. The orphan nuclear receptor SXR coordinately regulates drug metabolism and efflux [J]. Nature Medicine, 2001, 7(5): 584-590.[15] SPEK A L. Structure validation in chemical crystallography [J]. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography, 2009, 65(2): 148-155.[16] FRAME J D. Mainstream Research in Latin America and Caribbean [J]. Interciencia, 1977, 2(2): 143-148.[17] SCHUBERT A, BRAUN T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact [J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5-6): 281-291.[18] CHEN K, GUAN J. A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(2): 233-247.[19] DING Z Q, GE J P, WU X M, et al. Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries [J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(3): 829-844.[20] HU X,ROUSSEAU R.A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(2): 475-491.[21] GARG K C. Scientometrics of laser research in India and China [J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 55(1): 71-85.[22] GUAN J, MA N. A comparative study of research performance in computer science [J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 61(3): 339-359.[23] GUAN J, MA N. A bibliometric study of China's semiconductor literature compared with other major asian countries [J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(1): 107-124.[24] 张俊艳, 祝文超. 基于文献计量分析的985高校创业教育研究评价[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(S1): 252-258.[25] QIU H, CHEN Y F. Bibliometric analysis of biological invasions research during the period of 1991 to 2007 [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 601.[26] GLNZEL W, DANELL R, PERSSON O. The decline of Swedish neuroscience: decomposing a bibliometric national science indicator [J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 57(2): 197-213.[27] PAVITT K. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from us theory and practice? (and what they should not learn) [J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2001, 10(3): 761-779.[28] 张艺, 许治, 朱桂龙. 协同创新的内涵、层次与框架[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(18): 20-28. |
|
|
|
