|
|
|
| Study on Large Cities' Impact on Economic Growth of Surrounding Small and Medium-sized Cities in the New Era |
| Li Jingwen1,2,Chi Shaojie1,2 |
| (1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology; 2. Research Base of Beijing Modern Manufacturing Development, Beijing 100124, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the context of the integrated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region as a national strategy, it is necessary to analyze the relationship of economic growth between large cities and small cities in this region and to clarify whether large cities are really conducive to the economic growth of small cities in order to shake off poverty. Taking 128 small cities in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei as examples, this paper estimates the spatial spillover effects between cities from both same and different hierarchies by adding geographical distance, administrative boundary and industrial structure into classic economic growth model. It is found that the core cities restrain the economic growth of the surrounding small cities which supports that the "agglomeration shadow" proposed by new economic geography and the phenomenon "poverty belt around Beijing and Tianjin". Negative spillovers of economic growth exist among small cities, compared with the Yangtze River Delta region where core cities benefit the economic growth of their adjacent cities, the radiating function and the trickle-down effect of core cities within the BTH region are obviously weak, and the development gap between large and small cities is greater. Finally, policy implications are put forward on how to make use of spatial spillover effect and promote the coordinated development among large, medium-sized, and small cities from the aspects of breaking market segmentation caused by administrative boundaries, strengthening the radiation spillover effect of central cities, and scientifically orientation of urban functions at all levels.
|
|
Received: 20 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]马玉芳, 沙景华. 环京津贫困带问题研究[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2016, 18(4): 34-40.[2]何仁伟, 樊杰, 李光勤. 环京津贫困带的时空演变与形成机理[J].经济地理, 2018, 38(6): 1-9.[3]刘浩, 马琳, 李国平. 1990s 以来京津冀地区经济发展失衡格局的时空演化[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(3): 471-481. [4]王冀平. 从缪尔达尔“循环积累因果理论”看“环京津贫困带”问题[J]. 经济论坛, 2012 (2): 19-24.[5]殷阿娜, 邓思远. 环京津贫困带生态—贫困耦合关系困境的博弈分析[J]. 当代经济管理, 2017, 39(3): 57-62.[6]毛汉英. 京津冀协同发展的机制创新与区域政策研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 2-14.[7]张亚明, 石笑贤, 严玲玉. 环京津贫困带空间贫困测度与精准扶贫研究[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2018, 39(3): 74-80.[8]张祖群. 扶贫旅游的机理及其研究趋向: 兼论对环京津贫困带启示[J]. 思想战线, 2012, 38(2): 104-108.[9]孙斌栋, 丁嵩. 大城市有利于小城市的经济增长吗? 来自长三角城市群的证据[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9): 1615-1625.[10]梅志雄, 徐颂军, 欧阳军. 近20 年珠三角城市群城市空间相互作用时空演变[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(6): 694-701.[11]张学波, 陈思宇, 廖聪. 京津冀地区经济发展的空间溢出效应. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9): 1753-1766.[12]AU C C, HENDERSON J V. Are Chinese cities too small[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73(3): 549-576.[13]柯善咨, 夏金坤. 中原城市群的集聚效应和回流作用[J]. 中国软科学, 2010(10): 93-103.[14]WEI Y D, DANLIN Y U, CHEN X. Scale, agglomeration, and regional inequality in provincial China[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2011, 102(4): 406-425.[15]孙东琪, 张京祥, 胡毅. 基于产业空间联系的“大都市阴影区”形成机制解析: 长三角城市群与京津冀城市群的比较研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(9): 1043-1050. [16]王涛, 曾菊新. 长江中游城市群城际竞合空间格局分析: 基于城市竞争力与空间相互作用的视角[J]. 热带地理, 2014, 34(3): 390-398.[17]ZHAO C. A core- periphery model of urban economic growth: empirical evidence using Chinese city-level data, 1990-2006[R]. Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series, 2011.[18]柯善咨. 中国中西部发展中城市的增长极作用[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(3): 521-534. [19]HERING L, PONCET S. Income per capita inequality in China: the role of economic geography and spatial interactions[J]. World Economy, 2010（33）:655-679.[20]王成龙, 刘慧, 张梦天. 行政边界对城市群城市用地空间扩张的影响: 基于京津冀城市群的实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(1): 173-183.[21]BARRO R J. Inequality and growth in a panel of countries[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2000, 5(1): 5-32.[22]魏丽华. 京津冀产业协同发展的困境分析[J]. 开发研究, 2016, 183(2): 117-121. |
| [1] |
. [J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2009, 26(5): 100-102. |
|
|
|
|
