|
|
|
| Research on Fusion Efficiency Connotation and Evaluation for Network-Based Innovation Team: Based on the Perspective of Resource View |
| Sun Xinle,Duan Wanchun,Wang Yuhua,Xu Chenglei |
| Faculty of Management & Economics, Kunming University of Science & Technology, Kunming 650093, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to effectively evaluate the future attribute of network-based innovative team, introducing the perspective of resource view which can solve fusion efficiency's dynamic uncertainty, and considering the trust problems because of information asymmetry on the integration process, the differences of trust's types and team's requisite resources, the current article bring the three above into a same framework , forming three interactional analytical dimensions which adapt to its features include strong flexible and adaptable, high uncertainty and the various combination between tasks, skills and rolls. on this basis explores the coupling relationship between resource integration process ,the life cycle of teams and the evolution of trust, gives three kinds of fusion efficiency connotation which use to describe different fusion effects, builds improved DEA method which contains expert decision information, dynamic evaluates the future resource fusion efficiency of the network-based innovative team and bases on multiple attribute group decision making method. Case application result shows that the evaluation method is feasible, it has a strong practical significance for cognizing the coupling relationship between the three dimensions, improving the future efficiency of network innovative team and guiding the quality management of teams.
|
|
Received: 25 August 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Sun Xinle
|
|
|
|
［1］许成磊, 段万春. 有层次类型创新团队的关键客体界面识 别［J］. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(2):121-128.
［2］BARNEY J B. Resource-based theories, of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view［J］. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6):643-650.
［3］JONG B A D, ELFRING T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? the mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(3):535-549.
［4］赵西萍, 杨扬, 辛欣. 团队能力、组织信任与团队绩效的关系研究［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, 29(3):155-159.
［5］秦开银, 杜荣, 李燕. 临时团队中知识共享对快速信任与绩效关系的调节作用研究［J］. 管理学报, 2010, 7(1):98-102.
［6］董保宝, 葛宝山. 新创企业资源整合过程与动态能力关系研究［J］. 科研管理, 2012, 33(2):107-114.
［7］TUCKMAN B W, JENSEN M A C. Stages of small-group development revisited［J］. Group & Organization Management, 1977, 2(4):419-427.
［8］KANAWATTANACHAI P, YOO Y. Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams［J］. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2002, 11(3-4):187-213.
［9］董保宝, 葛宝山, 王侃. 资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径［J］. 管理世界, 2011(3):92-101.
［10］COSTA A C. Work team trust and effectiveness［J］. Personnel Review, 2003, 32(5):605-622.
［11］WINTER S G. Understanding dynamic capabilities［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10):991-995.
［12］王重鸣, 邓靖松. 团队中信任形成的映象决策机制［J］. 心理学报, 2007, 39(2):321-327.
［13］JULIAN GOULD WILLIAMS. The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: a study of public-sector organizations［J］. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003, 14(1):28-54.
［14］EISENHARDT K M, MARTIN J A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11):1105-1121.
［15］HELFAT C E, PETERAF M A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 24(10):997-1010.
［16］SIRMON D G, IRELAND R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 32(1):273-292.
［17］NEWBERT S L. Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(7):745-768.
［18］GRIFFITHS N. Enhancing peer-to-peer collaboration using trust［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2006, 31(4):849-858.
［19］PARREIRAS R O, EKEL P Y, MARTINI J S C, et al. A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments［J］. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(7):1075-1089.
［20］许成磊, 段万春. 混合非结构MAGDM的决策导向一致性检验方法［J］. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(23):17-22. |
|
|
|
