|
|
|
| Analysis on the Policy Structure of the Enterprises' Default Risk Control of the Carbon Market in China |
| Li Jian1,2,Yang Yang1,Wang Qingshan3 |
| 1.School of Management，Tianjin University of Technology，Tianjin 300384, China;2.College of Management and Economic，Tianjin University，Tianjin 300072, China;3.College of Humanities,Tianjin Agricultural College, Tianjin 300384, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The policy structure of carbon market is closely related to the risk of default, and scientific and reasonable policy structure is an important guarantee to avoid the risk of default of carbon market enterprises. It combs the central government of China promulgated the carbon market companies default risk control related policy texts as samples, from the trading and emission reduction dimensions construct two dimensional analysis framework of enterprises' default risk control policy of the carbon market, using content analysis method to analyze China's existing risk control policy structure. The research results show the current China's carbon market enterprises' default risk control policy coverage overlap each other, is likely to affect the implementation effect; corporate default punishment system there are still loopholes in the punishment is too large or lead to corporate wrongdoing; relative lack of carbon price control policy, fluctuations in the price of carbon easily lead to breach of contract. And, it optimizes and improves the research results, in order to provide policy support for the effective control of corporate default risk in the construction of China's national carbon market.
|
|
Received: 06 September 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Li Jian
|
|
|
|
［1］CHICGILNISKY，SHEERAN.Saving Kyoto: an insider′s guide to what it is, how it works and what it means for the future ［M］. London: Garfield House, 2009.
［2］陈冉.碳价暴跌买家欲违约 中国2700项目前景恶化［EB/OL］. 2013-02-27［2015-11-23］. http://news.hexun.com/2013-02-27/151532887.html.fromtool=roll.
［3］LABATT S, WHITE R R. Carbon finance: the financial implications of climate change［C］. Transactions of the Cryogenic Engineering Conference: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2007.
［4］张晨,杨玉,张涛. 基于Copula模型的商业银行碳金融市场风险整合度量［J］. 中国管理科学,2015,23(4):61-69.
［5］王遥, 王文涛. 碳金融市场的风险识别和监管体系设计［J］.中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(3):25-31.
［6］LABELLE M. Constructing post-carbon institutions: assessing EU carbon reduction efforts through an institutional risk governance approach［J］. Energy Policy, 2012,40(1):390-403.
［7］YARAGHI N, LANGHE R G. Critical success factors for risk management systems［J］. Risk Res, 2011,14 (5): 551-581.
［8］GOULDSON A, SULLIVAN R. Long-term corporate climate change targets: what could they deliver［J］. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013, 27(27):1-10.
［9］SUBRAMANIAM N, WAHYUNI D, COOPER BJ, et al. Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: evidence from Australian firms［J］.Journal of Cleaner Production,2015（96）:407-417.
［10］杨超,李国良,门明. 国际碳交易市场的风险度量及对我国的启示——基于状态转移与极值理论的VaR比较研究［J］. 数量经济技术经济研究,2011,4(4):94-109+123.
［11］CH EV A L LI ER J, IEL PO F, M ERCIER L. Risk aversion and institutional information disclosure on the European carbon market: a case-study of the 2006 compliance event ［J］. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(1):15-28.
［12］凤振华,魏一鸣. 欧盟碳市场系统风险和预期收益的实证研究［J］. 管理学报,2011,8(3):451-455.
［13］王国飞. 怎样规避碳交易市场风险［J］. 环境经济,2015(Z3):32-33.
［14］黄蓓佳,杨海真.中国碳减排承诺解读及碳交易发展研究［J］. 长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(2):11-13.
［15］陈健鹏. 温室气体减排政策:国际经验及对中国的启示——基于政策工具演进的视角［J］. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(9):26-32.
［16］马海涌,张伟伟,李泓仪. 国际碳市场的风险、监管及其对我国的启示［J］. 税务与经济,2011,15(6):54-57.
［17］KOLBE R H,BURNETT M S.Content-analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity［J］. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991,18(2): 243-250.
［18］BERELSON B.Content analysis in communication research［M］. Glencoe, IL: Free Press,1952.
［19］刘伟. 内容分析法在公共管理学研究中的应用［J］. 中国行政管理,2014,18(6):93-98.
［20］VINCENT J DURIAU,RHONDA K REGER,MICHAEL D PFARRER.A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements ［J］. Organizational Research Methods,2007,10(1): 5-34.
［21］赵筱媛,苏竣. 基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究［J］. 科学学研究,2007,25(1):52-56.
［22］张韵君. 政策工具视角的中小企业技术创新政策分析［J］. 中国行政管理,2012(4):43-47.
［23］蔡凌曦,范莉莉,鲜阳红. 基于内容分析法的城市节能减排政策的分类研究［J］. 生态经济,2013(12):49-53.
［24］CAMPRUBí R, COROMINA L. Content analysis in tourism research［J］. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2016, 18:134-140.
［25］王诗乐,陈敏鹏,王克,等. 中国电力行业低碳政策及其社会经济影响分析［J］. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(5):14-18.
［26］罗敏,朱雪忠. 基于政策工具的中国低碳政策文本量化研究［J］. 情报杂志,2014,33(4):12-16.
［27］顾建光.公共政策工具研究的意义、基础与层面［J］.公共管理学报，2006,13(4):58-61+110.
［28］ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. Reindusdalization and technology［M］. New York: Logman Group Limited, 1985.
［29］李健,高杨,李祥飞. 政策工具视域下中国低碳政策分析框架研究［J］. 科技进步与对策,2013,30(21):112-117.
［30］HARFORD JD. Self-reporting of pollution and the firm's behavior under imperfectly enforceable regulations［J］.Journal of Environmental Economics & Management，1987,14(3):293-303.
|
|
|
|
