|
|
Economic Analysis on the Barzel Property Rights Theory of Collaborative Innovation Subjects |
Shi Zhuqin1,3,Cai Ruilin2,Zhu Xianqi1 |
1.School of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China;2.Department of Economics and Management,Changzhou Institute of Light Industry Technology,Changzhou 213164,China;3.School of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,Taiyuan 030024,China |
|
|
Abstract Based on the examples of collaborative innovation of Changzhou Science and Education Town, property rights of innovation subjects are economically analyzed by using Barzel's theory of property rights. It reveals that minimal waste is the inner mechanism of collaborative innovation, and all knowledge transactions can be implemented based on the mixture of two mechanisms "contract" and "non-contract". Besides, it finds that transaction cost of collaborative innovation system shows an increasing trend with system change, and it finds that agglomeration of technology resources is in an equilibrium state with moderate scale, complementary function and relatively stable network structure, while "smorgasbord" type of science and technology resources agglomeration cannot stimulate the synergies. On this basis, the following five proposals are put forward, that is to deal with the relationship between collaborative innovation implementation scheme and system construction, to play a leading role of the government, to grasp the equilibrium of collaborative innovation system, to pay attention to the development of intellectual property rights and to implement the mixture of science and technology trading resources.
|
Received: 13 September 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shi Zhuqin
|
|
|
|
[1]PARK H W,LEYDESDORFF L.Longitudinal trends in networks of university- industry- government relations in South Korea:the role of programmatic incentives[J].Research Policy,2010,39(5):640-649.
[2]李培凤.我国大学、产业、政府三螺旋效果分析及政策建议[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(12):3-9.
[3]武建奇,张润峰.论巴泽尔产权思想的独特性[J].当代经济研究,2014(4):21-29.
[4]洪名勇.巴泽尔产权不完全理论探析[J].河北经贸大学学报,2016,37(1):33-36.
[5]约拉姆·巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].费方域,段毅才,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:6.
[6]程民选.巴泽尔产权理论的独特视角及其现实启示[J].河北经贸大学学报,2014,35(5):41-45.
[7]洪银兴.产学研协同创新的经济学分析[J].经济科学,2014(1):56-64.
[8]LEBEAU L M,LAFRAMBOISE M C,LARIVIRE V,et al.The effect of university–industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications:the Canadian case,1980-2005[J].Research Evaluation,2008,17(3):227-232.
[9]MURMANN J P.The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments[J].Organization Science,2013,24(1):58-78.
[10]常州科教城园区概况.http://www.czkjc.gov.cn/class/HDHQJDMF.
[11]曹艳.创新型国家建设过程中政府的制度供给与维度[J].经济问题探索,2007(2):12-15.
[12]万幼清,张妮,鲁平俊.产业集群协同创新风险及其形成机理研究[J].管理世界,2015(2):182-183.
[13]危怀安,王婉娟.生态关系对国家重点实验室协同创新系统稳定性影响研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(2):1-7.
[14]胡希宁,陈锐.现代西方宏观经济学近二十年来的转变[J].东南大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2013,15(5):49-54.
[15]林毅夫.自生能力、经济发展与转型:理论与实证[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004:9. |
|
|
|