|
|
Collaborative Innovation Knowledge Sharing Based on Blockchain Technology |
Fang Gang,Wang Jiahui |
(School of Management, Hangzhou University of Electronic Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310018,China) |
|
|
Abstract Collaborative innovation is a comprehensive and in-depth cooperative innovation behavior and process with innovation as the goal and multi-agent, multi-element and multi-stage collaborative interaction as the center. From the perspective of knowledge innovation, collaborative innovation refers to the network organization that promotes knowledge flow and sharing through knowledge acquisition, transmission, application and feedback activities, and increases the knowledge reserve of each member, and finally forms knowledge advantages through knowledge collaborative creation. Among them, knowledge sharing is not only an important part of the above process, but also the main way to realize the diffusion of knowledge among collaborative subjects (enterprises and research institutions). However, collaborative innovation knowledge sharing needs to coordinate the knowledge elements and the environment, as well as the relationship between knowledge sharing subjects, in order to integrate the scattered and disordered knowledge in the system into a new orderly knowledge system, and realize collaborative innovation. Existing research believes that blockchain, as an open source underlying technology, can attract collaborative innovation partners with different knowledge structures and organizational cultures, but the impact of blockchain technology on knowledge sharing in collaborative innovation and the mechanism through which this impact plays a role are vogue. This paper aims to explore the knowledge sharing process of collaborative innovation under the influence of blockchain, and build a knowledge sharing network system for collaborative innovation based on blockchain to promote the application of blockchain technology in collaborative innovation system in practice.#br#The existing knowledge sharing theory of collaborative innovation believes that the nature of knowledge, the relationship between subjects, the level of conflict, and even the recognition of knowledge sharing results and the expectation of income distribution will affect the knowledge sharing process in collaborative innovation. From the perspective of the nature and characteristics of knowledge, with the advancement of collaborative innovation, tacit knowledge continues to increase, and the higher the complexity of knowledge, the worse the transferability of knowledge. Secondly, in the relationship between knowledge sharing subjects, trust plays a crucial role. Thirdly, from the perspective of inter-subject conflict, due to the differences in knowledge structure, organizational culture and innovation goals among the cooperating parties, conflicts among cooperative members are inevitable in the process of knowledge sharing, and this conflict will affect the process of knowledge sharing. Even in the case of the same goals, due to the bounded rationality of human beings and the complexity of knowledge, there will be coordination problems in knowledge sharing in collaborative innovation, and corresponding transaction costs will be generated. While blockchain technology can create a trustless distribution, and provides a solution to the problems of high maintenance cost, low transmission efficiency and low data security reliability existing in knowledge sharing between organizations.#br#Facing the problem of knowledge sharing in collaborative innovation, this paper introduces the case of collaborative innovation knowledge sharing in the Steemit blockchain network community and combines the characteristics of blockchain, uses VensimPLE software to build a system dynamics model for simulation analysis, and discusses the influence and mechanism of trustless partnership and high-heterogeneous partners in the process and results of collaborative innovation knowledge sharing. Among them, the experimental data adopts two parameter estimation methods: the first is to collect relevant data from literature search and white papers issued by authoritative organizations; the second is to collect real data information in the MSSQL database. The initial value of the total number of Steemit tokens is determined by collecting data information in the SteemDB browser. The experimental results show that trustless knowledge sharing partnership and high heterogeneity knowledge sharing partnership based on blockchain technology have a significant impact on improving the quality of knowledge sharing in collaborative innovation. To sum up, the process and performance of collaborative innovation knowledge sharing under the blockchain technology have been significantly improved. The trustless knowledge sharing partnership can ensure the authenticity of information in the process of collaborative innovation, promote mutual learning among collaborative innovation members, accelerate the transfer of tacit knowledge, and enhance the knowledge creation and knowledge sharing power of collaborative innovation members. High heterogeneity knowledge sharing partners can attract more collaborators, promote the formation of knowledge creation groups and knowledge sharing groups, and provide a wider range of knowledge sharing sources for collaborative innovation knowledge sharing, thus consolidating the foundation of knowledge creation.#br#
|
Received: 31 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 罗琳,魏奇锋,顾新. 产学研协同创新的知识协同影响因素实证研究[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(10):1567-1577.[2] 吴绍波,顾新. 战略性新兴产业创新生态系统协同创新的治理模式选择研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2014,26(1):13-21.[3] 唐承林,顾新,夏阳. 基于动态能力的知识网络知识优势向竞争优势转化研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2013,33(13):185-189,199.[4] 吴悦,李小平,涂振洲,等. 知识流动视角下动态能力影响产学研协同创新过程的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(8):115-123.[5] 姚艳虹,周惠平. 产学研协同创新中知识创造系统动力学分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2015,32(4):110-117.[6] 解学梅,刘丝雨. 协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效的影响机理[J]. 管理科学,2015,28(2):27-39.[7] 曹兴,刘芳,邬陈锋. 知识共享理论的研究述评[J]. 软科学,2010,24(9):133-137.[8] 邵奇峰,金澈清,张召,等. 区块链技术:架构及进展[J]. 计算机学报,2018,41(5):969-988.[9] 袁勇,王飞跃. 区块链技术发展现状与展望[J]. 自动化学报,2016,42(4):481-494.[10] 涂振洲,顾新. 基于知识流动的产学研协同创新过程研究[J]. 科学学研究,2013,31(9):1381-1390.[11] SANTORO M D,BIERLY P E,GOPALAKRISHNAN S. Organisational learning from external sources:new issues and performance implications[J]. International Journal of Technology Management,2007,38(1/2): 1-10.[12] 曾德明,何银芳,彭盾. 基于超循环理论的产学研系统中知识转移障碍研究[J]. 软科学,2009,23(7):1-5,11.[13] 宋建元,陈劲. 企业隐性知识共享的效率分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(2):58-61.[14] 冯长利,张明月,刘洪涛,等. 供应链知识共享与企业绩效关系研究:供应链敏捷性的中介作用和环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 管理评论,2015,27(11):181-191.[15] 刘晓云,赵伟峰. 我国制造业协同创新系统的运行机制研究[J]. 中国软科学,2015,30(12):144-153.[16] 戴勇,胡明溥. 产学研伙伴异质性对知识共享的影响及机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(6):66-79.[17] 张树山,郭坤,孙毅. 全球供应链系统环境下科技协同创新伙伴关系模糊组合评估方法[J]. 中国软科学,2014,29(5):164-172.[18] FEI GAO. Data encryption algorithm for e-commerce platform based on blockchain technology[J]. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems,2019,12(4-5):1457-1470.[19] ANJUM A,SPORNY M,SILL A. Blockchain standards for compliance and trust[J]. IEEE Cloud Computing,2017,4(4):84-90.[20] HEISKANEN A. The technology of trust:how the internet of things and blockchain could usher in a new era of construction productivity[J]. Construction Research and Innovation,2017,8(2):66-70.[21] 宫晓林,杨望,曲双石. 区块链的技术原理及其在金融领域的应用[J]. 国际金融,2017,11(2):46-54.[22] 唐朝永,牛冲槐. 协同创新网络、人才集聚效应与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2017,34(3):134-139.[23] BENDICKSON J,MULDOON J,LIGUORI E W,et al. Agency theory:background and epistemology[J]. Journal of Management History,2016,22(4):437-449.[24] FRIZZO-BARKER J,CHOW-WHITE P A,ADAMS P R,et al. Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business:a systematic review[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2020, 51: 102029.[25] 李晓,刘正刚. 基于区块链技术的供应链智能治理机制[J]. 中国流通经济,2017,31(11):34-44.[26] 王继业,高灵超,董爱强,等. 基于区块链的数据安全共享网络体系研究[J]. 计算机研究与发展,2017,54(4):742-749.[27] 韩璇,袁勇,王飞跃. 区块链安全问题:研究现状与展望[J]. 自动化学报,2019,45(1):206-225.[28] 邵奇峰,张召,朱燕超,等. 企业级区块链技术综述[J]. 软件学报,2019,30(9):2571-2592.[29] 刘敖迪,杜学绘,王娜,等. 区块链技术及其在信息安全领域的研究进展[J]. 软件学报,2018,29(7):2092-2115.[30] 危怀安,聂卓,疏腊林. 协同创新中心合作伙伴选择机理研究:基于2012年度“2011计划”名单的分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2014,31(9):1-4.[31] KONNO T. Network effect of knowledge spillover:scale-free networks stimulate R&D activities and accelerate economic growth[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,2016, 458: 157-167.[32] MORAN P,GHOSHAL S. Markets, firms, and the process of economic development [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(3): 390-412. [33] LIN T,YANG X,WANG T Y,et al. Implementation of high-performance blockchain network based on cross-chain technology for IoT applications[J]. Sensors,2020,20(11):3268.[34] 丁庆洋,王秀利,朱建明,等. 基于区块链的信息物理融合系统的信息安全保护框架[J]. 计算机科学,2018,45(2):32-39.[35] 张宁,王毅,康重庆,等. 能源互联网中的区块链技术:研究框架与典型应用初探[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2016,36(15):4011-4023.[36] 曾鸣,程俊,王雨晴,等. 区块链框架下能源互联网多模块协同自治模式初探[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2017,37(13):3672-3681.[37] 张礼卿,吴桐. 区块链在金融领域的应用:理论依据、现实困境与破解策略[J]. 改革,2019,32(12):65-75.[38] MEHTA S,GRANT K,ACKERY A. Future of blockchain in healthcare:potential to improve the accessibility,security and interoperability of electronic health records[J]. BMJ Health & Care Informatics,2020,27(3):1-6. [39] 郭笑春,胡毅. 数字货币时代的商业模式讨论:基于双案例的比较研究[J]. 管理评论,2020,32(1):324-336.[40] 王晰巍,邢云菲,赵丹,等. 基于社会网络分析的移动环境下网络舆情信息传播研究:以新浪微博“雾霾”话题为例[J]. 图书情报工作,2015,59(7):14-22.[41] SUN Q,HOU R Y. Knowledge forms and enterprise innovation performance[J]. International Journal of Knowledge Management,2017,13(3):55-70.[42] OTTE P,DE VOS M,POUWELSE J. Trustchain:a sybil-resistant scalable blockchain[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems,2020, 107: 770-780. |
|
|
|