|
|
|
| The Motivation Factors of the Urban Sci-tech Innovative Talents Policy Diffusion and Differences in Temporal and Spatial Dimensions |
| Peng Chuanyu,Liu Yue |
| (School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Talents play a vital role in scientific and technological innovation. The competition for technological innovation talents among cities has become increasingly fierce, and various cities have introduced policies to attract technological innovation talents. With the continuous policy implementation of scientific and technological innovation talents in various regions and departments, it also realizes the diffusion of policies.#br#As a frontier field of current international public management and public policy research, policy diffusion focuses on factors that drive cities at different levels and regions to adopt a certain policy or project one after another. Most of the existing studies have carried out policy description and characteristic analysis, text content analysis, and evaluation system construction of the science and technology innovation talent policy from a static perspective. However, few scholars have studied the science and technology innovation talent policy from the perspective of policy diffusion. It is beneficial?to study the motivation factors of the science and technology innovation talent policy diffusion and their temporal and spatial differences for it can not only expand the research perspective, contribute to the analysis of the diffusion of public policies for scientific and technological innovation talents in the Chinese scenario, but also help optimize urban science and technology talent policy.#br#This paper takes the cities at the fourth-tier and above prefecture-levelin China as the research object, and the investigation period is from 2012 to 2020. Samples from 161 cities are obtained after screening. On the basis of the Berry couple's internal decision model and regional diffusion model, this paper constructs a "demand-pull-pressure-push" model of technological innovation talent policy diffusion. Demand-pull factors originate from the internal environment of public policies and are closely related to the internal economic conditions of cities. This paper selects four variables of urban economic development level, population size, the proportion of tertiary industry and fiscal revenue to measure the impact of demand-pull factors on the diffusion of scientific and technological innovation talent policies. The pressure-push factors come from the external environment of public policies. This paper selects three variable of administrative orders, intergovernmental competition and public opinion to measure the impact of pressure-push factors on the diffusion of science and technology innovation talent policies. Finally, this paper puts forward seven research hypotheses from the two aspects of demand pull and pressure push, and uses event history analysis to verify the motivation factors of the diffusion of science and technology innovation talent policy. In addition, this paper divides the development of science and technology innovation talent policy diffusion into three stages according to the curve of the diffusion of science and technology innovation talent policies, including the steady growth period of policy diffusion, the acceleration period of policy diffusion and the deceleration period of policy diffusion, and analyzes the factors for the diffusion of science and technology innovation talent policies at each stage. At the same time, the 161 city samples are classified from the spatial dimension, and the factors affecting the diffusion of scientific and technological innovation talent policies are analyzed from the perspective of different regions in the east, middle and west. #br#It is found that the diffusion of urban science and technology innovation talent policy has a dual motivation factors. In the demand-pull factors, the level of economic development and fiscal revenue are the main factors affecting the urban science and technology innovation talent policy diffusion. In the pressure-driven factors, administrative instructions, inter-governmental competition and public opinion has a significant impact on the diffusion of urban science and technology innovation talent policies. In the period of steady growth of policy diffusion, the dual factors act together on the process of policy diffusion; while in the period of accelerated and decelerated growth of policy diffusion, the policy diffusion factors of urban science and technology innovation talents are different. In the eastern and central regions, the pressure-driven factor is dominant and in the western region, the dual factors have played a role.#br#This paper draws on the theoretical framework of policy diffusion and combines the policy practice of scientific and technological innovation talents in China to refine the motivation factor model of the diffusion of urban scientific and technological innovation talents. Different from previous studies, this paper uses discrete-time event history analysis to study the science and technology innovation talent policy from the perspective of policy diffusion, which enriches the research in the field of public policy diffusion in China and improves the dimensions and perspectives of policy diffusion research.#br#
|
|
Received: 15 September 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 郭哲.历史制度主义视野下我国科技人才政策战略转型与变革逻辑[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(20):76-82.[2] 李燕萍,刘金璐,洪江鹏,等.我国改革开放40年来科技人才政策演变、趋势与展望——基于共词分析法[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(10):108-117.[3] 崔宏轶,潘梦启,吴帅.我国经济特区科技人才政策变迁及对策建议——以深圳为例[J].江淮论坛,2020，43(5):30-36.[4] 张大力,葛玉辉.基于质性研究的河南省科技人才政策焦点分析[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(9):93-97.[5] 易江格,黄涛.基于内容分析法的湖北省科技人才政策研究[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(4):137-141.[6] 孙锐,孙雨洁.青年科技人才引进政策评价体系构建及政策内容评估[J].中国科技论坛,2020，36(11):120-128，146.[7] ZHANG Y L, ZHU X F. Multiple mechanisms of policy diffusion in China[J]. Public Management Review, 2019, 21 (4):495-514. [8] WALKER J L. The diffusion of innovations among the American states[J]. American Political Science Review, 1969, 63(3): 880-899.[9] ROGERS E M. Diffusion of innovations[M]. New York：The Free Press，1983:1-50.[10] LUCAS A. Public policy diffusion research: integrating analytic paradigms[J]. Knowledge, 1983,4(3):379-408.[11] 王浦劬,赖先进.中国公共政策扩散的模式与机制分析[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,59(6): 14-23.[12] 周望.政策扩散理论与中国“政策试验”研究:启示与调适[J].四川行政学院学报,2012,14(4):43-46.[13] 朱旭峰,赵慧.政府间关系视角下的社会政策扩散——以城市低保制度为例(1993—1999)[J].中国社会科学,2016,37(8):95-116,206.[14] BOUSHEY G. Policy diffusion dynamics in America[M]. New York：Cambridge University Press，2010:1-35.[15] BROWN L A, COX K R. Empirical regularities in the diffusion of innovation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015,61(3):551-559.[16] BERRY F S，BERRY W D. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research[M]// P SABATIER. Theories of the policy process. 3rd. Boulder，CO：Westview Press，2014:1-62.[17] VOLDEN C. States as policy laboratories: emulating success in the Children's health insurance program[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 2006,50(2):294-312.[18] KYU NAHM JUN, CHRISTOPHER WEARE. Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: the case of e-government[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2011,21(3):495-519.[19] 马亮.公共服务创新的扩散:中国城市公共自行车计划的实证分析[J].公共行政评论,2015,8(3):51-78,203.[20] 宋典,芮国强,何家媛.竞争、发展还是学习:地方政府人才政策创新的驱动因素研究[J].江海学刊,2018,61(6):241-247.[21] 吴光芸, 万洋. 政策创新的扩散:中国“证照分离”改革的实证分析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2019,37(4): 19-27.[22] 李智超.政策试点推广的多重逻辑——基于我国智慧城市试点的分析[J].公共管理学报，2019,17(3):1-10.[23] ARNOLD G. Street-level policy entrepreneurship[J]. Public Management Review, 2015, 17(3): 307-327.[24] ARNOLD G, NGUYEN LONG L A, GOTTLIEB M. Social networks and policy entrepreneurship: how relationships shape municipal decision making about high-volume hydraulic fracturing[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2017, 45(3): 414-441.[25] BIEDENKOPF K, VAN EYNDE S, WALKER H. Policy infusion through capacity building and project interaction: greenhouse gas emissions trading in China[J]. Global Environmental Politics, 2017, 17(3): 91-114.[26] 李健,张文婷.政府购买服务政策扩散研究——基于全国31省数据的事件史分析[J].中国软科学,2019,34(5):60-67.[27] 刘佳,刘俊腾.“最多跑一次”改革的扩散机制研究——面向中国294个地级市的事件史分析[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2020,29(4):26-36,125.[28] 陈新明,萧鸣政,史洪阳.地方人才政策创新扩散的动因分析——基于中国城市“人才新政”的实证研究[J].企业经济,2020,39(6):128-134.[29] 于飞.建国70年中国科技人才政策演变与发展[J].中国高校科技,2019,33(8):9-13.[30] 黎庆兴,李德显.推拉理论视域下高校人才流动困境及其治理路径[J].江苏高教,2021,37(10):4-52.[31] MOHR L B. Determinants of innovation in organizations[J]. American Political Science Review，1969，63（1）：111-126.[32] 王洪涛,陈洪侠.我国智慧城市创新扩散演进机理及启示——基于38个城市的事件史分析[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(3):44-48.[33] DAMANPURR F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators [J].Academy of Management Journal, 1991,23(34): 555-590.[34] WELCH S, THOMPSON K. The impact of federal incentives on state policy innovation[J]. American Journal of Political Science,1980,24(4):715-729.[35] ZHANG H，SHAHEEN S A，CHEN X P. Bicycle evolution in China：from the 1900s to the present[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation，2014，8（5）：317-335.[36] 郭志刚.社会统计分析方法 SPSS 软件应用[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2015:1-112. |
|
|
|
