|
|
|
| The Definition，Dimensions and Measurement on Foundational Capability of Manufacturing Industry |
| Bian Weijun1,Dong Qi1,Yu Longzhen1,Yang Chenzi2 |
| (1.College of Economics & Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061,China; 2.The Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Low levels of labor productivity and inadequate R& D investment imprison the manufacturing industry in the low end of the value chain of global industry at present. This problem has been an important factor of constraining development of China's manufacturing industry for a long time. The weak fundamental capability of Chinese manufacturing industry not only restricts the manufacturing industry towards the high-end of value chain, but also threatens national industrial security. The research on the connotation, dimension and scale of fundamental capability of manufacturing industry can not only provide theory and tools for evaluating the competitiveness of specific sectors of manufacturing industry and industrial safety level, but also support the formulation of future national policies for developing manufacturing industry effectively. Some scholars have studied the fundamental capability of industry from basic components, basic materials, basic process and basic technology empirically without systemic analysis.#br#In theory, for a country or region, fundamental capability of industry depends on the labor position in the global value chain and its value-added capacity on undertaking process. To this end, from the perspective of value chain, this paper takes rail transit equipment manufacturing enterprise as an example, and explores the connotation, dimension and measurement scale of industrial fundamental capability. The conclusions drawn through the investigation are as follows. Fundamental capability of manufacturing industry is the resultant force that plays a supporting role in the quality, safety and competitiveness of manufacturing development with long-term science and technology accumulation. On the structure, the fundamental capability of manufacturing industry includes four basic dimensions: technical support capability, production organization capability, marketing capability and industry driven capability. Further, grounded analysis reveals 14 observation variables under four dimensions of fundamental capability. Corresponding to the 14 observation variables, this paper develops a measurement scale with 28 issues. This scale can be used not only to measure the industrial fundamental capacity of the rail transit equipment manufacturing industry, but also measure that of high-end CNC machine tools and robotics, aerospace equipment, marine engineering equipment and high-tech ships, energy-saving and new energy vehicles, etc.#br#Compared with existing research, this study expands the application scope of value chain by combining value chain with industry basic capacity measurement, and evaluates value creation activity according to the different roles. According to the content of value creation activities, it decomposes fundamental capability into technology support capacity, production organization capacity, marketing capacity and industry driving capacity, which provides new ideas for exploring industry fundamental capability of different manufacturing sectors. The interpretation of industry fundamental capability's connotation makes up for the lack of systematic explanation of industry fundamental capability in existing research. The scale provides the possibility for practical measurement and lays the foundation for subsequent empirical research.#br#To strengthen industry fundamental capability, some critical measures are needed to be taken as soon as possible. First of all, we need to encourage the establishment of technological innovation industrial complexes to obtain technological breakthroughs by concentrating the innovation resources of the whole industry. Secondly, by integrating manufacturing resources in the industrial chain and improving production capacity, we also need to continue to establish an industrial Internet platform. Third, we should widely establish the view of improving the international market competitiveness of industrial products through improving product quality and technological progress. This is becoming the trend to develop high quality product in the manufacturing industry in China. Lastly, it is vital to formulating dominantly industry norms and consolidating industry influence needs.#br#
|
|
Received: 11 October 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 韩江波.智能制造产业基础能力的微观解析及其政策含义[J].学习与实践,2020,37(3):48-60.[2] 盛朝迅.推进我国产业链现代化的思路与方略[J].改革,2019,35(10):45-56.[3] PORTER M E.The competitive advantage[M].New York:Free Press,1985.[4] KAPLINSKY R．Globalization and unequalisation:what can be learned from value chain analysis[J].Journal of Development Studies,2000,37(2):117-146.[5] COSIMO BEVERELLI,VICTOR STOLZENBURG,ROBERT B,et al.Domestic value chains as stepping stones to global value chain integration[J].The World Economy,2019,42(5):1467-1494.[6] 黄群慧,倪红福.基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J].经济体制改革,2020,38(5):11-21.[7] 王一鸣.百年大变局、高质量发展与构建新发展格局[J].管理世界,2020,36(12):1-13.[8] 黄体鸿,胡树华.汽车产业的关联性分析[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25(5):92-94.[9] 赵福全,刘宗巍,郝瀚,等.中国汽车工业强基战略与实施建议[J].中国软科学, 2016,31 (10):1-10.[10] 罗仲伟,孟艳华.“十四五”时期区域产业基础高级化和产业链现代化[J].区域经济评论,2020,43(1):32-38.[11] 黄毅敏,齐二石.工业工程视角下中国制造业发展困境与路径[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(4):85-94.[12] 高伟.如何建立基于科技自立自强的产业创新生态系统[J].科学学研究,2021,39(5): 774-776.[13] 涂圣伟.产业基础能力和产业链水平如何提升[N].经济日报,2019-09-03(015).[14] 李万.加快提升我国产业基础能力和产业链现代化水平[J].中国党政干部论坛,2020,37(1):26-30.[15] 高凤勤,徐震寰,王春春.提升我国产业基础能力的增值税政策探讨[J].税务研究,2020,36(3):59-62.[16] 李燕.夯实产业基础能力打好产业链现代化攻坚战[N].中国工业报,2019-09-12(002).[17] 张其仔.提升产业链供应链现代化水平路径研究[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(2):80-97.[18] 李显君,熊昱,冯堃.中国高铁产业核心技术突破路径与机制[J].科研管理,2020, 41(10):1-10.[19] IANSITI M. Technology integration: managing technological evolution in a complex environment[J].Research Policy,1995,24(4):521-542.[20] GRANT R M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration[J].Organization Science,1996,7(4):375-387.[21] 崔永梅,赵妍,于丽娜.中国企业海外并购技术整合路径研究——中国一拖并购McCormick案例分析[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(7):97-105.[22] 卢凌霄,王必好,杨林生,等.竞争性创新与产学研协同创新的技术转化产出异质性研究——基于方程模型的一种最优技术转化率分析[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(18):1-9.[23] 沈能,周晶晶.参与全球生产网络能提高中国企业价值链地位吗:“网络馅饼”抑或“网络陷阱”[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(4):11-17.[24] 李平,刘楚楠.中国工业品出口对美制造业创新的影响[J].学习与探索,2019,41(10):111-117.[25] 李坤望,蒋为,宋立刚.中国出口产品品质变动之谜:基于市场进入的微观解释[J].中国社会科学,2014,35(3):80-103,206.[26] 苗蕴慧,姚爽.5G技术与我国制造业国际市场竞争力的提升[J].学术交流,2020,36(10): 124-132.[27] 林晓言,刘秀英,曾哲.高铁品牌效应与市场竞争力:机理与实例[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2015,14(1):16-23.[28] 吴绍波.新兴产业平台创新生态系统的配套产品合作开发机制研究[J].软科学,2015, 29(2):51-55.[29] 马永开,李仕明,潘景铭.工业互联网之价值共创模式[J].管理世界,2020,36(8): 211- 222.[30] 朱国军,宣昌勇,孙军.智能制造核心企业创新生态优势形成的过程机理——基于海尔公司的探索性案例研究[J].管理现代化,2021,41(3):40-47. |
|
|
|
