如何使供应商参与绿色产品创新更有效——参与模式及治理形式适配的作用

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021050360

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY

2021, Vol. 38

Issue (18): 114-123 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021050360

Enterprise Innovation Management

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

How to Make Supplier Involvement in Green Product Innovation More Effectively：the Role of the Adaptation of Involvement Modes and Governance Forms

Li Bo^1,2,Xu Hui¹,He Zheng^1,2

（1. School of Management,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,China;2.The Institute of Belt and Road Textile Development and Innovation,Xi'an 710048,China)

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (1515 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a value co-creation activity among supply chain,supplier involvement is of great significance to the green product innovation of manufacturing enterprises.Based on the transaction costs theory and social exchange theory,this research analyses the effects of the fit between supplier involvement mode and supplier governance form(SIM-SGF fit) on supplier involvement effectiveness,and further explores the transformation mechanisms between SIM-SGF fit and supplier involvement effectiveness by supplier relationship-specific investments.The empirical study from 246 manufacturing firms shows that outsourcing supplier involvement with formal control,collaborative supplier involvement with social control,and inquiring supplier involvement with orthogonality ambidextrous control are conducive to improve supplier involvement effectiveness.Supplier relationship-specific investments play differently mediating roles in the main effects of SIM-SGF fit on supplier involvement effectiveness.

Key words： Green Product Innovation Supplier Involvement Supplier Relationship Governance Relationship-specific Investments Collaborative Innovation Effectiveness

Received: 13 May 2021

ZTFLH:

F406.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Bo
	Xu Hui
	He Zheng

Cite this article:

Li Bo,Xu Hui,He Zheng. How to Make Supplier Involvement in Green Product Innovation More Effectively：the Role of the Adaptation of Involvement Modes and Governance Forms[J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2021, 38(18): 114-123.

URL:

http://www.kjjb.org/EN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2021050360 OR http://www.kjjb.org/EN/Y2021/V38/I18/114

[1] 任胜钢,项秋莲,何朵军.自愿型环境规制会促进企业绿色创新吗?以ISO14001标准为例[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(6):1-11.
[2] LEE V H,OOI K B,CHONG A Y L,et al.A structural analysis of greening the supplier,environmental performance and competitive advantage[J].Production Planning & Control,2015,26(2):116-130.
[3] 李勃,和征,李随成.供应商参与绿色产品创新中的权力组合策略研究基于资源动员视角[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(4):84-96.
[4] WANG Q W,HUO B F,ZHAO X D.What makes logistics integration more effective? governance from contractual and relational perspectives[J].Journal of Business Logistics,2020,41(3):259-281.
[5] 李勃,王丛迪,和征.绿色产品协同创新中契约形式对供应商创新性的影响——供应商绿色创新资源优先配置的中介及产品复杂性与技术新颖性的调节[EB/OL].[2021-07-12].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.g3.20210203.1440.004.html.
[6] ZHANG M H,ZENG W J,TSE Y K,et al.Examining the antecedents and consequences of green product innovation[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2021（93）:413-427.
[7] ZHANG Q,PAN J,FENG T.Green supplier integration and environmental performance: do environmental innovation and ambidextrous governance matter[J].International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2020,50(7/8):693-719.
[8] LIN L H,HO Y L.Ambidextrous governance and alliance performance under dynamic environments:an empirical investigation of Taiwanese technology alliances[J].Technovation,2021,103:102240.
[9] LE DAIN M A,MERMINOD V.A knowledge sharing framework for black,grey and white box supplier configurations in new product development[J].Technovation,2014,34(11):688-701.
[10] CHENG C C J.Sustainability orientation,green supplier involvement,and green innovation performance:evidence from diversifying green entrants[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2020,161(2):393-414.
[11] CLAUSS T,BOUNCKEN R B.Social power as an antecedence of governance in buyer-supplier alliances[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2019, 77:75-89.
[12] 张延涛.供应商适应行为影响因素的作用机理研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(2):168-180.
[13] DAI J,CANTOR D E,MONTABON F L.How environmental management competitive pressure affects a focal firm's environmental innovation activities:a green supply chain perspective[J].Journal of Business Logistics,2015,36(3):242-259.
[14] PETERSEN K J,HANDFIELD R B,RAGATZ G L.Supplier integration into new product development:coordinating product,process and supply chain design[J].Journal of Operations Management,2005,23(3-4):371-388.
[15] LILIANI,TJAHJONO B,CAO D M.Advancing bioplastic packaging products through co-innovation:a conceptual framework for supplier-customer collaboration[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020, 252:119861.
[16] MELANDER L.Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation:external and internal capabilities[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2018,27(6):677-693.
[17] ZHANG J,ZHANG Y,DU M.The impact of relative governance on B2B firms' value appropriation from industrial buyer-seller relationships: empirical evidence from China[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021, 36(2): 230-243.
[18] ZHANG Q,JIN J L,YANG D.How to enhance supplier performance in China: interplay of contracts,relational governance and legal development[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2020,40(6):777-808.
[19] UM K H,OH J Y.The interplay of governance mechanisms in supply chain collaboration and performance in buyer-supplier dyads: substitutes or complements[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2020,40(4):415-438.
[20] CHEN Q,SEURING S,WAGNER R.A review of inter-firm relationship quality in supply chains[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2020,ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
[21] WAGNER S M,BODE C.Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing[J].Journal of Operations Management,2014,32(3):65-78.
[22] 李维安,李勇建,石丹.供应链治理理论研究:概念、内涵与规范性分析框架[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):4-15,42.
[23] PULLES N J,LOOHUIS R P A.Managing buyer-supplier conflicts:the effect of buyer openness and directness on A supplier's willingness to adapt[J].Journal of Supply Chain Management,2020,56(4):65-81.
[24] BARBOSA A P P L,SALERNO M S,BRASIL V C,et al.Coordination approaches to foster open innovation R&D projects performance[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2020（58）:101603.
[25] SHOU Y,LI Y,PARK Y W,et al.The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration[J].International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2017,47(4): 297-317.
[26] HUANG M C,CHIU Y P.Relationship governance mechanisms and collaborative performance:a relational life-cycle perspective[J].Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,2018,24(3):260-273.
[27] YAN T T,DOOLEY K.Buyer-supplier collaboration quality in new product development projects[J].Journal of Supply Chain Management,2014,50(2):59-83.
[28] CHI R,ZHANG J,DENG G.How cooperative innovation could be more effective in China: a relationship perspective[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021,36(8): 1358-1370.
[29] KHAN I,EILERT M.The varying impact of buyer and supplier expected relationship-specific investments on relationship governance[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021, 36(6): 905-916.
[30] HARMANCIOGLU N,WUYTS S,OZTURAN P.Governance implications of modularity in sourcing relationships[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2021,49(3):601-625.
[31] LIU Y,LUO Y D,LIU T.Governing buyer-supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms:Evidence from China[J].Journal of Operations Management,2009,27(4):294-309.
[32] ARRANZ N,DE ARROYABE J C F.Effect of formal contracts,relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects[J].British Journal of Management,2012,23(4):575-588.