|
|
|
| Research on Configuration Effect of Influencing Factors in Regional Technology Transfer：From the Dual Perspective of Export and Absorption |
| Sun Liwen1,Wu Linfei1,Qi Peixiao2 |
| （1.School of economics and management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China;2.China Research Institute for Science Popularization, Beijing 100081, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The coordinated development of regional technology transfer is an important driving force for the high-quality development of technological innovation, but the development of regional technology transfer in China is seriously unbalanced. With qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method, analyzes the configuration effect of the influencing factors of regional technology transfer in China, and finally obtains thirteen antecedent conditional configurations. By combination of configurations, the configuration effects can be divided into five types: ability-intermediary driven model, environment-intermediary driven model, economic driven model, ability-intermediary missing model and economic-ability-environment missing model. The results show that the higher degree of marketization or industrial agglomeration under the ability-intermediary driven model will improve the efficiency of export and absorption. Moreover, having a higher level of economic development and industrial agglomeration under the environment-intermediary driven model will promote the unilateral development of technology export. Furthermore, the higher degree of marketization under the economic driven model will promote the unilateral development of technology absorption. The results of research provide an effective reference for the coordinated development of technology transfer.
|
|
Received: 11 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 潘雄锋,张静,米谷. 中国区际技术转移的空间格局演变及内部差异研究[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(2):240-246. [2] 许倞,贾敬敦. 2019全国技术市场统计年报[M]. 北京:兵器工业出版社,2019. [3] 戴魁早,刘友金. 市场化改革能推进产业技术进步吗:中国高技术产业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究,2020，63(2):71-90. [4] 刘洪民,杨艳东. 高校科技中介机构在技术转移中的作用及发展思路[J]. 研究与发展管理,2007,19(5):133-137. [5] BESSANT J,RUSH H. Building bridges for innovation:the role of consultants in technology transfer[J]. Research Policy,1995,24(1):97-114. [6] 吕荣杰,张冰冰,张义明. 跨区域技术转移效率前因组态研究[J]. 科学学研究,2018,36(11):1986-1994. [7] 侯媛媛,刘云,张振伟. 北京技术输出的模式及其影响因素研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2017,29(1):65-74. [8] 范红忠. 有效需求规模假说、研发投入与国家自主创新能力[J]. 经济研究,2007,42(3):33-44. [9] 郑伟. 技术转移与经济增长研究:基于科技支撑和引领经济发展的视角[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2008,25(10):3-16. [10] 彭向,蒋传海. 产业集聚、知识溢出与地区创新:基于中国工业行业的实证检验[J]. 经济学(季刊),2011,10(3):913-934. [11] ROY S. Technology transfer from national R&D laboratories and the development of regional industrial clusters in India[J]. Industry and Higher Education,2004,18(1):39-45. [12] MINBAEVA D,PEDERSEN T,BJRKMAN I,et al. MNC knowledge transfer,subsidiary absorptive capacity,and HRM[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(6):586-599. [13] 康继军,孙彩虹. 知识产权保护的区域技术创新效应与技术获取渠道异质性研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2016,33(1):33-37. [14] YANG L,MASKUS K E. Intellectual property rights,technology transfer and exports in developing countries[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2009,90(2):231-236. [15] 冉启英,任思雨,吴海涛. OFDI逆向技术溢出、制度质量与区域创新能力:基于两步差分GMM门槛面板模型的实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(7):40-47. [16] 纪晓丽. 市场化进程、法制环境与技术创新[J]. 科研管理,2011,32(5):8-16. [17] 刘锋,王永杰,陈光. 对科技中介几个基本问题的研究:基于技术创新的分析和认识[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(4):55-58. [18] HOWELLS J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation[J]. Research Policy,2006,35(5):715-728. [19] HOPPE H C,OZDENOREN E. Intermediation in innovation[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2005,23(5-6):483-503. [20] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry[M].University of Chicago Press,2008. [21] 杜运周,贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界,2017，33(6):155-167. [22] 曾春媛,刘青青,王锦,等. 科技投入与区域经济发展水平协调性研究[J]. 科研管理,2013,34(S1):203-210. [23] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019. [24] 郭曼,朱常海,邵翔,等. 中国技术转移机构的发展策略研究:基于能力升级的视角[J]. 中国科技论坛,2018，34(1):16-23. [25] TOTH Z,THIESBRUMMEL C,HENNEBERG S C,et al. Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA[J]. Journal of Business Research,2015,68(3):723-734. [26] FISS P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420. |
|
|
|
