|
|
Internetization, Intellectual Property Protection and Regional Innovation Output |
Li Xue1,Wu Fuxiang1,Zhu Lile1,Yang Song2 |
(1.Economic School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,China;2.School of Mathematical Statistics, GuiZhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025,China) |
|
|
Abstract Based on the panel data of 30 provinces and cities in my country from 2003 to 2018, this paper empirically tested the influence of internetization and intellectual property protection on regional innovation output. Research shows that China’s current intellectual property protection can promote regional innovation output. It is on the left side of the inverted U-shaped curve of the “optimal intellectual property theory” as a whole, and it can also indirectly promotes regional innovation by promoting the development of regional R&D personnel and R&D funds investment. Internetization also has a significant effect on regional innovation output, and the increase in the level of internetization can enhance the role of intellectual property protection in promoting regional innovation output; intellectual property protection and internetization have a significant impact on regional innovation output. The impact of export has obvious regional heterogeneity. The innovation promotion effect of intellectual property protection is more prominent in the central and western regions, and the positive coordination effect of intellectual property protection and internetization is also more prominent in the central and western regions. In this regard, in order to achieve the coordinated development of regional innovation, differentiated and appropriate intellectual property protection policies should be implemented.
|
Received: 09 February 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1] HURMELINNA L P,PUUMALAINEN K.Nature and dynamics of appropriability—strategies for appropriating returns on innovation[J]. R&D Management,2007,37(2):95-112.[2] 李春涛,郭培培,张璇.知识产权保护、融资途径与企业创新——基于跨国微观数据的分析[J].经济评论,2015,36(1):77-91.[3] ARROW K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions, the rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors[M]. Princeton University Press,1962. [4] 胡凯,吴清,胡毓敏.知识产权保护的技术创新效应——基于技术交易市场视角和省级面板数据的实证分析[J].财经研究,2012,38(8):15-25.[5] 李蕊,巩师恩.开放条件下知识产权保护与我国技术创新——基于1997—2010年省级面板数据的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(3):1-9.[6] 尹志锋,叶静怡,黄阳华,等.知识产权保护与企业创新:传导机制及其检验[J].世界经济,2013,36(12):111-129.[7] 鲁桐,党印.投资者保护、行政环境与技术创新:跨国经验证据[J].世界经济,2015,38(10):99-124.[8] 吴超鹏,唐菂.知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2016,51(11):125-139.[9] PARK W G. International patent protection:1960-2005[J].Research Policy,2008,37(4):761-766.[10] 庄佳强,王浩,张文涛.强化知识产权司法保护有助于企业创新吗——来自知识产权法院设立的证据[J].当代财经,2020,41(9):16-27.[11] 康继军,孙彩虹.知识产权保护的区域技术创新效应与技术获取渠道异质性研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(1):33-37.[12] 顾群,翟淑萍.高技术产业知识产权保护、金融发展与创新效率——基于省级面板数据的研究[J].软科学,2013,27(7):42-46.[13] 刘思明,侯鹏,赵彦云.知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力——来自省级大中型工业企业面板数据的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015,32(3):40-57.[14] 王华.更严厉的知识产权保护制度有利于技术创新吗[J].经济研究,2011,46(S2):124-135.[15] HANSEN B E. Threshold effect in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2):345-368.[16] 宋旭光,赵雨涵.中国区域创新空间关联及其影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(7):22-40.[17] 李婧,谭清美,白俊红.中国区域创新生产的空间计量分析——基于静态与动态空间面板模型的实证研究[J].管理世界,2010,26(7):43-55, 65.[18] 魏浩,巫俊.知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新[J].金融研究,2018,61(9):91-106.[19] GINARTE J C,PARK W G.Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study[J]. Research Policy,1997,26(3):283-301.[20] 李勃昕,庞博,张犁.中国对外直接投资逆向驱动创新效率提升的检验——基于知识产权保护约束的视角[J].经济与管理研究,2019,40(3):58-70.[21] 施炳展,李建桐.互联网是否促进了分工:来自中国制造业企业的证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(4):130-149.[22] 张旭亮,史晋川,李仙德,张海霞.互联网对中国区域创新的作用机理与效应[J].经济地理,2017,37(12):129-137.[23] 生延超,李辉.中国互联网规模对技术效率的影响与空间溢出效应[J].地理科学,2018,38(9):1402-1411.[24] ANSELIN L, FLORAX R, REY S J. Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications[M]. Berlin: Springer Verlag,2004.[25] BALTAGI B. Econometric analysis of panel data[M].New York: John Wiley & Sons,2001.[26] 朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,49(6):45-53+94.[27] 彭向,蒋传海.产业集聚、知识溢出与地区创新——基于中国工业行业的实证检验[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(3):913-934. |
|
|
|