|
|
|
| The Management and Collaboration Mode of China’s Basic Research: a Multi-scale Comparison between Projects |
| Dong Jinyang1,Liu Tiezhong1,Dong Ping2,Lu Yunmeng1 |
| (1.School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China；2.Business School, Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai 519088, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract According to the current policies for the development of basic research, two management patterns including free exploration and demand-oriented are proposed. We build scientific collaboration networks, based on the published data of the NSFC and 973 Program in the CNKI database. Four scientific collaboration modes are concluded for basic research from three scales. A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages are made under the two management patterns. We find that the demand-oriented management mode leads to more balanced and linear types of scientific collaboration, while the free exploration management mode leads to more one-node, linear, and central type of scientific collaboration. Two management modes need to boost the breadth and depth of scientific collaboration, demand-oriented management mode can make up shortages but lacks the ability to cope with future uncertainty, free exploration management mode can deal with the uncertainty but is unable to quickly make up shortages, respectively as short - and long-term solutions used in combination to solve the current problems in basic research.
|
|
Received: 18 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 汪品先. 转型——我国基础研究的当务之急[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(10): 38-40.[2] LEAHEY E. From sole investigator to team scientist:trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,2016,42(1):81-100.[3] 钱万强,林克剑,闫金定,等. 主要发达国家基础研究发展策略及对我国的启示[J]. 科技管理研究,2017,37(12):37-41. [4] NEWMAN M E J. Network construction and fundamental results[J]. Physical Review E,2001,64(1):1-8. [5] NEWMAN M E J. Shortest paths,weighted networks,and centrality[J]. Physical Review E,2006,73(3):039906.[6] 吴善超. 科研环境对基础研究绩效的影响机制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2015. [7] 张小筠. 基于增长视角的政府R&D投资选择:基础研究或是应用研究[J]. 科学学研究,2019,37(9):1598-1608. [8] 高杰,丁云龙,胡亚伟. 中外基础研究创新团队资助管理机制比较研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(8):100-105. [9] 饶子和. 从“973计划”到国家新型基础研究支持体系[J]. 中国基础科学,2017,19(4):17-18. [10] BIKARD M,MURRAY F,GANS J S. Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work:collaboration and scientific reward[J]. Management Science,2015,61(7):1473-1495. [11] LEE S,BOZEMAN B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity[J]. Social Studies of Science,2005,35(5):673-702. [12] CLARK B Y,LLORENS J J. Investments in scientific research:examining the funding threshold effects on scientific collaboration and variation by academic discipline[J]. Policy Studies Journal,2012,40(4):698-729. [13] KLUG M,BAGROW J P. Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams[J]. Royal Society Open Science,2016,3(4):160007.[14] 刘亮,罗天,曹吉鸣. 基于复杂网络多尺度的科研合作模式研究方法[J]. 科研管理,2019,40(1):191-198.[15] 赵蓉英,王旭,亓永康. 我国世界一流大学建设高校间科研合作网络研究:基于CNKI和WoS数据的对比[J]. 情报理论与实践,2018,41(10):1-7. [16] 韩童茜,王立梅,许鑫. 长三角城市群科研合作网络演化研究:基于SCIE和SSCI论文的实证分析[J]. 情报理论与实践,2020,43(10):151-156.[17] MILO R,SHEN-ORR S,ITZKOVITZ S,et al. Network motifs:simple building blocks of complex networks[J]. Science,2002,298(5594):824-827.[18] MA N,LI H J,WANG Y H,et al. Interaction pattern features and driving forces of intersectoral CO2 emissions in China:a network motif analysis[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2019,149:391-412.[19] WUCHTY S,JONES B F,UZZI B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science,2007,316(5827):1036-1039.[20] WERNICKE S,RASCHE F. Fanmod:a tool for fast network motif detection[J]. Bioinformatics,2006,22(9):1152-1153.[21] 李杰,陈超美. CiteSpace 科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2017. [22] BARABASI,ALBERT. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science,1999,286(5439):509-512.[23] WATTS D J,STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks[J]. Nature,1998,393(6684):440-442.[24] HOWELL N,BURT R S,MINOR M J. Applied network analysis:a methodological introduction[J]. Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie,1985,10(2):209.[25] BIHARI A,PANDIA M K. Key author analysis in research professionals' relationship network using citation indices and centrality[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2015,57:606-613.[26] ZHENG J,GONG J Y,LI R,et al. Community evolution analysis based on co-author network:a case study of academic communities of the journal of "Annals of the Association of American Geographers"[J]. Scientometrics,2017,113(2):845-865.[27] 李文兰,王野,李立,等. 基于多属性决策合著网络关键节点识别研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2017,40(9):95-100. |
|
|
|
