|
|
|
| Research on Evolutionary Characteristics and Governance Mechanism of Enterprise Network Digital Transformation |
| Sun Guoqiang1,Li Teng2,Zhang Baojian3 |
| (1. Research Center of Organizational Innovation and Network Governance, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics;2.School of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics;3.School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030031, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This article takes the logic law of digital transformation of enterprise network as the main line, analyzes the knowledge graph of the existing research on enterprise network digitalization and extracts the key factors using interpretation and correspondence methods. The digital transformation of enterprise network is divided into the initial period of digital transformation, the development period of digital transformation, and the imbalance period of digital transformation. The system archetypes are established around the key factors of enterprise network digital transformation, and the evolution characteristics of different stages of enterprise network digital transformation are analyzed. On this basis, the problems and obstacles encountered in the process of digital transformation are discussed, and some effective governance mechanisms are formed by analyzing leverage solutions and cases. The research results are helpful to clarify the internal laws of enterprise network digital transformation, and have important theoretical significance and practical guiding value for the realization of enterprise network digital transformation.
|
|
Received: 28 September 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 朱秀梅，陈琛，蔡莉. 网络能力、资源获取与新企业绩效关系实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报，2010，13(4)：44-56.[2] 逄健，朱欣民. 国外数字经济发展趋势与数字经济国家发展战略[J]. 科技进步与对策，2013，30(8)：124-128.[3] GOLZER F，FRITZSCHE A. Data-driven operations management: organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice[J]. Production Planning and Control，2017，28(16)：1332-1343.[4] 肖旭，戚聿东. 产业数字化转型的价值维度与理论逻辑[J]. 改革，2019(8)：61-70.[5] SUSARLA A，TAN Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content：evidence from YouTube[J]. Information Systems Research，2012，23(1)：123-141.[6] DEICHMANN U，GOYAL A，MISHRA D.Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries? [J]. Agricultural Economics，2016，47(S1)：21-33.[7] GALINDO M M，CASTANO M M，MENDEZ P M. Digital transformation，digital dividends and entrepreneurship：a quantitative analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research，2019, 101：522-527.[8] BHARADWAJ A，SAWY O A E，PAVLOU P A，et al. Digital business strategy：toward a next generation of insights[J]. Mis Quarterly，2013，37(2)：471-482.[9] MOORE J F. Predators and prey：a new ecology of competition[J]. Harvard Business Review，1993，71(3)：75-83.[10] LANSITI M，LAKHANI K R. Digital ubiquity：how connections，sensors，and data are revolutionizing business[J]. Harvard Business Review，2014，92(11)：72-88.[11] TILSON D，LYYTINEN K，SORENSEN C. Digital infrastructures：the missing is research agenda[J]. Information Systems Research，2010，21(4)：748-759.[12] KOCH T，WINDSPERGER J.Seeing through the network：competitive advantage in the digital economy[J]. Journal of Organization Design，2017，6(6)：1-30.[13] YOO Y，HENFRIDSSON O，LYYTINEN K. The new organizing logic of digital innovation：an agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research，2010，21(4)：724-735.[14] EVANS D S，SCHMALENSEE R. Matchmakers：the new economics of multisided platforms[M]. Boston：Harvard Business Review Press，2016.[15] EATON B，ELALUF-CALDERWOOD S，SORENSEN C，et al. Distributed tuning of boundary resources：the case of apple's ios service system[J]. Mis Quarterly，2015，39(1)：217-243.[16] VIAL G. Understanding digital transformation：a review and a research agenda[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems，2019(28)：118-144.[17] SENYO P K，LIU K，EFFAH J. Digital business ecosystem：literature review and a framework for future research[J]. International Journal of Information Management，2019，47：52-64.[18] 张翠梅,吴国邦. 企业专利联盟运作困境与化解策略[J]. 学术交流，2017(2)：146-151.[19] LESTER D L，PARNELL J A，CARRAHER S. Organizational life cycle: a five-stage empirical scale[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis，2013，11(4)：339-354.[20] 李明惠. 生命周期视域下大企业集群自主创新模式选择[J]. 科技进步与对策，2018，35(8)：92-99.[21] 刘晓燕，魏云凤，杨娟. 演化视角下技术创新网络节点进退机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策，2017，34(4)：10-13.[22] 倪渊，张健. 基于生命周期的联盟企业网络能力评价[J]. 中国科技论坛，2015，30(11)：66-72.[23] 姜红，孙舒榆，吴玉浩. 技术标准联盟知识生态系统演化机理分析——闪联产业联盟案例[J]. 科技进步与对策，2019，36(21)：1-9.[24] GULATI R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal，1998，19(4)：293-317.[25] 周青，邹凡，何铮. 生命周期视角下产业技术创新战略联盟冲突影响因素演变研究[J]. 科技进步与对策，2017，34(4)：66-71.[26] 彼得·圣吉. 第五项修炼：学习型组织的艺术与实践[M]. 张成林，译. 北京：中信出版社，2018.[27] BRZEZINA N，BIELY K，HELFGOTT A，et al. Development of organic farming in europe at the crossroads：looking for the way forward through system archetypes lenses[J]. Sustainability，2017, 9(5): 821.[28] 杨桂菊，陈思睿，王彤. 本土制造企业低端颠覆的理论与案例研究[J]. 科研管理，2020，41(3)：164-173.[29] 中国信息化百人会课题组. 数字经济：迈向从量变到质变的新阶段[M]. 北京：电子工业出版社，2018.[30] 曹宁，任浩，喻细花. 模块化组织中核心企业治理能力的内涵与结构——以海尔集团为例[J]. 科技进步与对策，2015，32(24)：65-70.[31] 王凤彬，王骁鹏，张驰. 超模块平台组织结构与客制化创业支持——基于海尔向平台组织转型的嵌入式案例研究[J]. 管理世界，2019，35(2)：121-150,199-200.[32] 王海军，张悦. 企业模块化协同创新及网络化资源管理：基于海尔的探索性研究[J]. 科技进步与对策，2018，35(21)：97-105.[33] 严建援，乔艳芬. 云生态系统形成动因的多视角分析：以阿里云生态系统为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理，2015，36(11)：56-68. |
|
|
|
