|
|
Is the Innovation Siphon of FDI Still Effective |
Guo Hui1,Li Boxin2,Liu Ruojiang1 |
(1. Economics School, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710100, China;2.School of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710061, China) |
|
|
Abstract Driven by dual strategies of promoting new pattern of comprehensive opening-up and building innovative country, it is key to study and judge the innovation siphon effect of foreign investment opening scientifically. What needs to be solved is how to leverage the spillover dividends of foreign investment effectively. It discussed the evolution logic of FDI innovation siphon effect based on internal and external technology potential difference, explained the impact mechanism of IPR incentive on FDI innovation spillover. Empirical study based on panel data of 30 provinces found that, the innovation siphon effect introduced by opening-up and FDI is not static, with inhibitory effect of marginal decline on regional innovation development. Under the regulation of high-intensity IPR value incentive, the innovation spillover track of FDI could be effectively adjusted, and the innovation siphon channel of FDI introduction is opened with "U" law to drive regional innovation development. Furthermore, there is certain spatial heterogeneity in the regulatory impact of IPR value incentives, it is more effective on FDI innovation spillover in eastern and central regions. The conclusion provided new empirical evidence and path enlightenment for optimizing common rail spillover of FDI and IPR value incentive, that is advantageous to innovative country construction.
|
Received: 09 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] AKHTARUZZAMAN M,BERG N,HAJZLER C.Expropriation risk and FDI in developing countries:does return of capital dominate return on capital[J].European Journal of Political Economy,2017,49(5):84-107.[2] 魏浩,连慧君,巫俊.中美贸易摩擦、美国进口冲击与中国企业创新[J].统计研究,2019,36(8):46-59.[3] HELPMAN E.Trade,FDI,and the organization of firms[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2006,44(3):589-630.[4] 张涵,李晓澜.FDI与OFDI溢出对高技术产业区域创新的门槛效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(3):74-81.[5] BITZER J.KEREKES M.Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? new evidence[J].Economics Letters,2008,18(3):452-465.[6] PERRI A,PERUFFO E.Knowledge spillovers from FDI:a critical review from the international business perspective[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2016,18(1):3-27.[7] GHEBRIHIWET N.Acquisition or direct entry,technology transfer,andFDI policy liberalization[J].International Review of Economics & Finance,2017,51(3):455-469.[8] ZHANG H,SONG S.Promoting exports the role of inward FDI in China[J].China Economic Review,2000,11(4):385-396.[9] 李磊,冼国明,包群.“引进来”是否促进了“走出去”——外商投资对中国企业对外直接投资的影响[J].经济研究,2018,53(3):142-156.[10] 唐宜红,张鹏杨.FDI、全球价值链嵌入与出口国内附加值[J].统计研究,2017,34(4):36-49.[11] 韩超,朱鹏洲.改革开放以来外资准入政策演进及对制造业产品质量的影响[J].管理世界,2018, 34(10): 43-62.[12] 谢子远,张浩飞,王佳,等.中国高技术产业研发投入为何偏低:FDI的视角[J].科研管理,2017,38(11):1-9.[13] 田毕飞,陈紫若.FDI对中国创业的空间外溢效应[J].中国工业经济,2016,33(8):40-57.[14] 邵玉君.FDI、OFDI与国内技术进步[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,34(9):21-38.[15] LIANG Z,XUE L.The evolution of china's IPR system and its impact on the patenting behaviors and strategies of multinationals in China[J].International Journal of Technology Management,2010,51(51):469-496.[16] KEUPP M,BECKENBAUER A,GASSMANN O.How managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies[J].R& D Management,2009,39(7):211-224.[17] 胡立君,郑玉.知识产权激励、FDI技术溢出与企业创新绩效[J].审计与经济研究,2014,29(5):105-112.[18] 庄子银,李宏武.FDI、知识产权与中国的专利结构[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(1):81-91.[19] 张慧颖,邢彦.知识产权激励、外国直接投资与中国出口技术进步研究——基于行业特征的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2018,34(8):119-128.[20] DEMENA,BINYAM,BERGEIJK,et al.Analysis of FDI and productivity spillovers in developing countries[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,2017,31(2):546-571.[21] 李虹含,贺宁,汪存华,等.产业结构升级的创新驱动效应研究——基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(2):54-61.[22] MICHAEL PORTER.Competitive Strategy:techniques for analyzing industries and competitors[M].New York:Free Press,1980.[23] 徐盈之,王晶晶.知识产权保护、产学研协同创新与产品质量升级[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,38(3):24-30.[24] BRUCE HANSEN.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation,testing,and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2):345-368.[25] 白俊红,蒋伏心.协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效[J].经济研究,2015,50(7):174-187.[26] 张勋,乔坤元.中国区域间经济互动的来源:知识溢出还是技术扩散[J].经济学(季刊),2016,15(4):1629-1652.[27] 李勃昕,韩先锋,李宁.知识产权保护是否影响了中国OFDI逆向创新溢出效应[J].中国软科学,2019,34(3):46-60.[28] SZCZYGIELSKI K,GRABOWSKI W,PAMUKCU T.Does government support for private innovation matter?firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries[J].Research Policy,2017,46(1):219-237.[29] PEDRONI P.Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors[J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1999,61(S1):653-670.[30] GREINER A,KAUERMANN G.Debt policy in euro area countries:evidence for Germany and Italy using penalized spine smoothing[J].Economic Modelling,2008,25(2):1144-1154.[31] 杨振兵,张诚.两税合并后外资企业创新效率提升了吗——来自中国制造业的证据[J].财贸经济,2015,36(9):19-32.[32] 韩先锋,宋文飞,李勃昕.互联网能成为中国区域创新效率提升的新动能吗[J].中国工业经济,2019,36(7):119-136. |
|
|
|