|
|
|
| The Impact of Technology Management Capability on Radical Technological Innovation Behavior:the Joint Moderating Effects of Environmental Turbulence and Competitive Hostility |
| Liu Yexin1,Wu Weiwei 2 |
| (1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai), Weihai 264209, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Using radical technological innovation to achieve overtaking and catching-up is a necessary way for China to achieve high-quality economic development.The success of radical technological innovation is inseparable from the implementation of innovation behavior, and thus how to promote radical technological innovation behavior has become an urgent problem in theory and practice.This paper explores the impact of technology management capability on radical technological innovation behavior, and further analyzes the moderating effect of environmental turbulence on that relationship, and the moderating effect of competitive hostility towards the moderating effects of technological turbulence and market turbulence.The results show that technology management capability exerts positive impact on radical technological innovation behavior.Environmental turbulence positively moderates the relationship between technology management capability and radical technological innovation behavior.Competitive hostility could strength the positive moderating effect of environmental turbulence.
|
|
Received: 20 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] AUGIER M, GUO J, ROWEN H.The Needham puzzle reconsidered: organizations, organizing, and innovation in China[J].Management and Organization Review, 2016, 12(1): 5-24.[2] 徐建中, 曲小瑜.低碳情境下装备制造企业技术创新行为的影响因素分析[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(3): 29-37.[3] SCHOENMAKERS W, DUYSTERS G.The technological origins of radical inventions[J].Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1051-1059.[4] 吴贵生, 谢伟.我国技术管理学科发展的战略思考[J].科研管理，2006, 26(6): 49-55.[5] ARGOTE L, HORA M.Organizational learning and management of technology[J].Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(4): 579-590.[6] CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D.Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities[J].Technovation, 2009, 29(4): 237-246.[7] CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D.Technology management activities and tools[M].2nd ed.London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.[8] PILKINGTON A, TEICHERT T.Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships[J].Technovation, 2006, 26(3): 288-299.[9] CHRISTENSEN C M, ROSENBLOOM R S.Explaining the attacker's advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network[J].Research Policy, 1995, 24(2): 233-257.[10] 赵娜, 张晓峒, 杨坤佳.我国中小企业技术创新行为的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2014, 29(5): 74-78.[11] LE BAS C, MOTHE C, NGUYEN-THI T U.The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence[J].European Journal of Innovation Management, 2015, 18(1): 110-127.[12] FELDMAN M P, KELLEY M R.The exante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior[J].Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1509-1521.[13] KANG K N, PARK H.Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs[J].Technovation, 2012, 32(1): 68-78.[14] CHANG Y C, CHANG H T, CHI H R, et al.How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? the organizational capabilities view[J].Technovation, 2012, 32(7/8): 441-451.[15] 阿热孜古力·吾布力, 杨建君.跨职能意见冲突、知识探索与突破性创新的关系研究[J].管理学报, 2020, 17(2), 234-242.[16] NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL(NRC).Management of technology:the hidden competitive advantage[M].Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1987.[17] CARVALHO M M, FLEURY A, LOPES A P.An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): contributions and trends[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80(7): 1418-1437.[18] BAHEMIA H, SILLINCE J, VANHAVERBEKE W.The timing of openness in a radical innovation project, a temporal and loose coupling perspective[J].Research Policy, 2018, 47(10): 2066-2076.[19] CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D R.Technology management as a profession and the challenges ahead[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2016, 41(3): 1-13.[20] HUNG K P, CHOU C.The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence[J].Technovation, 2013, 33(10/11): 368-380.[21] 姚艳虹, 张翠平.知识域耦合、知识创新能力与企业创新绩效——环境不确定性和战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(23): 76-84.[22] CHEN J, NEUBAUM D O, REILLY R R, et al.The relationship between team autonomy and new product development performance under different levels of technological turbulence[J].Journal of Operations Management, 2015, 33(1): 83-96.[23] HALL J, ROSSON P.The impact of technological turbulence on entrepreneurial behavior, social norms and ethics: three internet-based cases[J].Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 64(3): 231-248.[24] CHUNG H F L, YANG Z, HUANG P H.How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? the contingency role of guanxi networking[J].Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(6): 1216-1224.[25] SANTOS-VIJANDE M L, LVAREZ-GONZLEZ L I.Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: the moderating role of market turbulence[J].Technovation, 2007, 27(9): 514-532.[26] WANG G, DOU W, ZHU W, et al.The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: the moderating role of market turbulence[J].Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(9): 1928-1936.[27] ZHOU J, MAVONDO F T, SAUNDERS S G.The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2019, 83(11): 31-41.[28] MILLER D, FRIESEN P H.Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1982, 3(1): 1-25.[29] AUH S, MENGUC B.Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity[J].Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(12): 1652-1661.[30] CAI S, YANG Z.On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: the role of performance frontiers[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 151(5): 131-145.[31] AUGUSTO M, COELHO F.Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2009, 38(1): 94-108.[32] ZHOU K Z, LI C B.How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies[J].Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(3): 224-231.[33] WU W W, YU B, WU C.How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation: the double helix mode of technological capability and technology management[J].Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6(1):160-183.[34] CANDI M, VAN DEN ENDE J, GEMSER G.Organizing innovation projects under technological turbulence[J].Technovation, 2013, 33(4): 133-141.[35] LICHTENTHALER U.Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(4): 822-846.[36] YANG T T, LI C R.Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development:the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness[J].Management Decision, 2011, 49(9): 1444-1470.[37] KELLEY D.Adaptation and organizational connectedness in corporate radical innovation programs[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009, 26(5): 487-501.[38] O'CONNOR G C, DEMARTINO R.Organizing for radical innovation:an exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006, 23(6): 475-497.[39] O'CONNOR G C, RAVICHANDRAN T, ROBESON D.Risk management through learning: management practices for radical innovation success[J].The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2008, 19(1): 70-82.[40] 冯军政.企业突破性创新和破坏性创新的驱动因素研究——环境动态性和敌对性的视角[J].科学学研究, 2013, 31(9):1422-1432.[41] CHEN C W, LIEN N H.Technological opportunism and firm performance: moderating contexts[J].Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66(11): 2218-2225.[42] BALODI K C.Strategic orientations and performance of young ventures[J].Management Decision, 2019, 58(4): 666-686. |
|
|
|
