|
|
Research on Industrial Experience Heterogeneity of Entrepreneurial Team, Governance Mechanism and Venture Growth Performance |
Gu Meng1,Zhang Xiaojie2,Wang Donghan1 |
(1. School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024,China;2.Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100,China) |
|
|
Abstract This paper establishes a conceptual model of the influence of industrial experience heterogeneity on venture growth performance, with entrepreneurial team governance mechanism (contract governance and relational governance) as mediator and entrepreneurial project innovativeness as moderator. The empirical results from 206 Chinese start-ups show that both contract governance and relational governance may mediate the positive influence of industrial experience heterogeneity on venture growth performance. Entrepreneurial project innovativeness weakens the positive effects of contract governance on venture growth performance while strengthens the positive roles of relational governance on venture growth performance.
|
Received: 26 August 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张银普, 钱思, 胡平.基于角色清晰与团队认同的创业团队断裂带对创业绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报, 2020, 17(4): 562-571.[2] 于晓宇, 张益铭, 陈颖颖, 等.创始成员离职率、高管团队异质性与创业企业成长[J].管理科学, 2020, 33(2): 3-16.[3] COLOMBO M G, GRILLI L.Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence based view [J].Research Policy, 2005, 34(6): 795-816.[4] 程江.创业团队异质性对创业绩效的影响研究综述[J].外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(10): 3-17.[5] 杜海东.创业团队经验异质性对进入战略创新的影响:创业学习的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(1): 132-139.[6] JACKSON S E, BRETT J F, SESSA V I, et al.Some differences make a difference:individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76(5): 675-689.[7] 彭学兵, 陈小波, 杨隽萍.创业团队异质性与新创企业成长绩效关系的实证研究: 团队整合的中介作用[J].人类工效学, 2014, 20(4): 12-16.[8] KLOTZ A C, HMIELESKI K M, BRADLEY B H, et al.New venture teams: a review of the literature and roadmap for future research[J].Journal of Management, 2014, 40(1): 226-255.[9] 周冬梅, 陈雪琳, 杨俊, 等.创业研究回顾与展望[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 206-225,243.[10] 朱仁宏, 王心纯, 王雅渲,等.创业团队契约治理与团队成员退出意愿:一个有中介的调节模型[J].研究与发展管理, 2019, 31(4): 103-113.[11] ZHOU W.Shared leadership in teams: an empirical study of dispositional antecedents[C]// the Annual Meeting of Academy of Management.Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management, 2013.[12] 刘刚, 李超, 吴彦俊.创业团队异质性与新企业绩效关系的路径:基于动态能力的视角[J].系统管理学报, 2017, 26(4): 655-662.[13] 任峰, 张朋朋.创业团队异质性与团队互动、决策绩效的关系路径:一项多案例研究[J].中国人力资源开发, 2017,34(4): 111-121.[14] WILLIAMS M.Being trusted: how team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross-boundary relationships[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37 (3): 346-373.[15] BLATT R.Tough love: how communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams[J].Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3): 533-551.[16] HMIELESKI K M, ENSLEY M D.A contextual examination of new venture performance:entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007, 28 (7): 865-889.[17] 胡望斌, 张玉利, 杨俊.同质性还是异质性:创业导向对技术创业团队与新企业绩效关系的调节作用研究[J].管理世界, 2014,30(6): 92-109, 187-188.[18] FOO M D.Teams developing business ideas: how member characteristics and conflict affect member-rated team effectiveness[J].Small Business Economics, 2011, 36(1): 33-46.[19] UGHETTO E.Growth of born globals: the role of the entrepreneur's personal factors and venture capital[J].International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2016, 12 (3): 839-857.[20] 向婷婷.CEO双元背景对平台企业成长绩效影响的研究[D].成都:电子科技大学, 2020.[21] ZOTT C, AMIT R.Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms[J].Organization Science, 2007, 18 (2): 181-199.[22] 郭海, 韩佳平.数字化情境下开放式创新对新创企业成长的影响:商业模式创新的中介作用[J].管理评论, 2019,31(6): 186-198.[23] 丁奕文, 徐谡.科技型创业团队异质性对创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2020, 22(2): 104-112.[24] DAZ-FERNNDEZ M C, GONZLEZ- RODRGUEZ M R, SIMONETTI B.Top management team diversity and high performance: an integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory[J].European Management Journal, 2020, 38(1): 157-168.[25] 李利, 陈进.创业团队异质性对科技型企业创新绩效的影响[J].技术与创新管理, 2020, 41(1): 69-74, 82.[26] 石书德, 张帏, 高建.新企业创业团队的治理机制与团队绩效的关系[J].管理科学学报, 2016, 19(5): 14-27.[27] 刘礼花.创业团队契约治理和关系治理研究述评[J].经济研究导刊, 2016,12(14): 157-160.[28] 朱仁宏, 周琦, 伍兆祥.创业团队契约治理真能促进新创企业绩效吗——一个有调节的中介模型[J].南开管理评论, 2018, 21(5):30-40.[29] 赵婧, 李朋波.创业团队关系治理研究述评与展望[J].中国人力资源开发, 2015,32(5): 33-41.[30] 牛芳, 张玉利, 杨俊.创业团队异质性与新企业绩效:领导者乐观心理的调节作用[J].管理评论, 2011, 23(11):110-119.[31] 杨俊, 田莉, 张玉利, 等.创新还是模仿: 创业团队经验异质性与冲突特征的角色[J].管理世界, 2010,26(3): 84-96.[32] 朱仁宏, 李新春.创业团队契约治理与新创企业绩效关系研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 54(4): 199-208.[33] 蔡聪.创业公司的动态股份分配机制[M].北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017.[34] 邓丽芳, 丁喆.创业团队特质、互动对绩效的影响[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,57(6): 13-20.[35] 郑鸿, 徐勇.创业团队信任的维持机制及其对团队绩效的影响研究[J].南开管理评论, 2017, 20(5): 31-42.[36] KINGSHOTT R P J.The impact of psychological contracts upon trust and commitment within supplier–buyer relationships: a social exchange view[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2006,35(6): 724-739.[37] JOSHI AW.When does customer orientation hinder (help) radical product innovation? the role of organizational rewards[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016, 33(4):435-454.[38] GARDNER HK.Performance pressure as a double-edged sword: enhancing team motivation but undermining the use of team knowledge [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2012, 57(1):1-46.[39] 谢洪涛.项目治理对重大建设项目技术创新绩效的影响——考虑项目创新度和复杂度的调节作用[J].技术经济, 2013, 32(9): 29-33.[40] 韩炜, 杨婉毓.创业网络治理机制、网络结构与新企业绩效的作用关系研究[J].管理评论, 2015, 27(12): 67-81.[41] VENKATRAMAN N, RAMANUJAM V.Measurementof business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches[J].Academy of Management Review, 1986 (11): 801-814.[42] 肖鹏, 周杨心悦, 刘景东, 等.社会网络、关系质量与新创企业成长关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(18):113-119.[43] AMASON A C,SHRADER R C,TOMPSON G H.Newness and novelty:relating top management team composition to new venture performance[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 2006,21(1):125-148.[44] NUNNALLY J.Psychometric theory[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1978.[45] AIKEN L S, WEST S G.Multiple regression:testing and interpreting interactions[M].Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, 1991. |
|
|
|