|
|
|
| Public Services, City Size and Talent Location: based on New Space Economics Theory |
| Dong Yaning1,Gu Yun2,Yang Kaizhong3,Fan Bokai2 |
| (1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;2. School of Urban Economics and Public Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China;3. Institute for Eco-civilization Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In this paper,city size is introduced into the new spatial economics theoretical model to discuss the mechanism of public service and city size on talent location, and the data of CMDS 2011-2017 and 244 cities data from 2010-2016 are used to test empirically.It finds out that:Firstly,city size has a nonlinear threshold effect on the public service, and only when city size meets a certain threshold condition, the supply of public services can significantly attract the inflow of talents; Secondly,the empirical analyses at the national level effectively verify the theoretical expectations;Thirdly,by region, the threshold conditions of eastern regions and central and western regions are heterogeneous, and talent flow in eastern cities presents competitive effect, talent flow in central and western cities presents agglomeration effect;Finnally,from the point of view of urban hierarchy, the threshold conditions of large cities and small and medium cities are obviously different, increasing the supply of public services has obviously affect on attracting talents in small and medium cities.At last, this paper puts forward the countermeasures of public service supply based on city size and regional heterogeneity.
|
|
Received: 07 May 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杨开忠.京津冀协同发展的新逻辑:地方品质驱动型发展[J].经济与管理,2019,33(1): 1-3.
[2] 董亚宁,杨开忠,顾芸.人口区位选择研究回顾与展望[J].西北人口, 2019, 40(6):1-11.
[3] 杨开忠.新中国70年城市规划理论与方法演进[J].管理世界,2019,35(12):17-27.
[4] LEE E S. A theory of migration[J]. Demography, 1966, 3(1) : 47-57.
[5] 董亚宁,顾芸,杨开忠.公共服务、人才资源空间重配与创新增长差异——基于新空间经济学的研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2020,41(6):108-118.
[6] 肖挺.环境质量是劳动人口流动的主导因素吗——“逃离北上广”现象的一种解读[J].经济评论,2016，37(2):3-17.
[7] 罗勇根,杨金玉,陈世强.空气污染、人力资本流动与创新活力——基于个体专利发明的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2019，36(10):99-117.
[8] 孙伟增,张晓楠,郑思齐.空气污染与劳动力的空间流动——基于流动人口就业选址行为的研究[J].经济研究,2019,54(11):102-117.
[9] 董亚宁,顾芸,陈威,等.地方品质、劳动力区位与区域创新发展——基于新空间经济学理论[J].西北人口,2020,41(4):47-57.
[10] 蒋小荣,汪胜兰.中国地级以上城市人口流动网络研究——基于百度迁徙大数据的分析[J].中国人口科学,2017，31(2):35-46+127.
[11] BEHRENS K, ROBERT-NICOUD F. Survival of the fittest in cities: urbanisation and inequality[J]. The Economic Journal, 2014, 124(581):1371-1400.
[12] 陆丰刚,陈寅平.市场化进程加速了人口流动吗——人口流动的市场化陷阱[J].人口与发展,2019,25(1):2-11.
[13] VENABLES A J. Productivity in cities: self-selection and sorting[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2010,11( 2): 241-251.
[14] DAVIS,DINGEL.The comparative advantage of cities[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2014.
[15] THOMAS V. Spatial differences in the cost of living[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1980, 8(1): 108-122.
[16] HENDERSON V. Urban primacy, external costs, and quality of life[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2002, 24(1): 95-106.
[17] COMBES P P, DURANTON G, GOBILLON L. The costs of agglomeration: land prices in French cities [J]. Social ence Electronic Publishing,2012.
[18] ALBOUY D, EHRLICH G. The distribution of urban land values: evidence from market transactions[J].International Atlantic Economic Society, 2013(10):12-15.
[19] BRINKMAN J.Congestion,agglomeration,and the structure of cities[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2016(94): 13-31.
[20] 张志强,孙斌栋.城市规模与城市福利——基于集聚经济和集聚成本的视角[J].上海经济,2019，36(5):33-52.
[21] 尤济红,陈喜强.去人力资本更高的城市发展:检验、机制与异质性——对中国城乡劳动力流向选择的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2019，40(5):159-172.
[22] 张志强,席强敏.新时代中国区域经济理论与实践研究的新进展——首届中国区域经济学者论坛综述[J].经济研究,2019,54(4):199-203.
[23] 杨开忠,董亚宁,薛领,等.“新”新经济地理学的回顾与展望[J].广西社会科学,2016，32(5):63-74.
[24] 孙三百,黄薇,洪俊杰,等.城市规模、幸福感与移民空间优化[J].经济研究,2014,49(1):97-111.
[25] 杨晓军.城市公共服务质量对人口流动的影响[J]. 中国人口科学，2017，31(2):104-128.
[26] 王珍珍,穆怀中.城市规模、门槛效应与人力资本外部性[J].上海行政学院学报,2018,19(2):88-99. |
|
|
|
