|
|
|
| Study on the Matching Relation between Openness Combination Strategy and Innovation Performance:the Moderating Role of Absorptive Capability |
| Xing Lebin1,Ren Chunxue1,Zeng Qiong2 |
| (1.School of Public Affairs, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;2.Productivity Promotion Center of Chongqing, Chongqing 401147, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper puts forward four types of openness combination strategies including high width-high depth, high width-low depth, low width-high depth and low width-low depth according to the width and the depth, two dimensions of innovation openness. Taking absorptive capacity as moderator variable, a theoretical model of the relationship between openness combination strategy and innovation performance is constructed. Investigation object includes 201 enterprises which distribute in three major regions and three industries in China. The multiple linear regression analysis method is used for empirical analysis. The results show that those carrying out high width-high depth combination strategy prefer to purchase radical innovation performance, but those carrying out three other strategies prefer to purchase gradual innovation performance. Absorptive capacity does not only positively moderate the relation between the high width-high depth, high width-low depth, low width-high depth and radical innovation performance, but also positively moderate the relation between the high width-high depth, high width-low depth, low width-high depth and gradual innovation performance.
|
|
Received: 16 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] LAURSEN K, SALTER A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2): 131-150.
[2] D′AMBROSIO A, GABRIELE R, SCHIAVONE F，et al.The role of openness in explaining innovation performance in a regional context[J].Technology Transfer,2017,42(2): 389-408 .
[3] 郑健壮,叶峥,徐寅杰.集群企业开放度对创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(4): 19-27.
[4] HUNG K P, CHOU C. The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating eff- ects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence[J]. Technovation,2013,33(10):368-380.
[5] PISANO G P, VERGANTI R. Which kind of collaboration is right for you[J]. Harvard Business Review,2008,11(6):1-9.
[6] NAN ZHANG,XUEJIAO ZHAO,ZHONGWEN ZHANG,et al. What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? a case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining [J].Government Information Quarterly, 2017,34(1): 126-133.
[7] CHUANG S H, LIN S, CHANG T C.Exploring the performance of service innovation: infrastructure capability and innovation orientation complementarity[C].2016 10th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS). IEEE, 2016.
[8] FOSFURI A. The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(12):1141-1158.
[9] GASSMANN O. Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda[J]. R&D Management, 2006,36(3):223-228.
[10] CHESBROUGH H,CROWTHER A K.Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries[J]. R&D Managemen,2006,36(3):229-236.
[11] CHEN J, CHEN Y,VANHAVERBEKE W. The influence of scope, depth and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms[J]. Technovation,2011, 31(8):362-373.
[12] LAZZAROTTI V, MANZINI R. Different modes of open innovation: a theoretical framework and an empirical study[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2009,13(4):615-636.
[13] CLASSEN N, VAN GILS A,BAMMENS Y, et al．Accessing resources from innovation partners: the search breadth of family SMEs[J].Journal of Small Business Management,2012,50(2): 191-215.
[14] 王建,胡珑瑛,马涛.吸收能力、开放度与创新平衡模式的选择——基于上市公司的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):304-312.
[15] 吕一博,施萧萧,冀若楠.开放式创新对企业渐进性创新能力的影响研究[J].科学学研究, 2017,35(2):289-301.
[16] HARGADON A B, BECHKY B A. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problemsolving at work[J]. Organization Science,2006,17(4):484-500.
[17] PARIDA V， WESTERBERG M， FRISHAMMAR J. Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2012,50(2): 283-309.
[18] INKPEN A C.Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2000,37(7):1019-1044.
[19] MCEVILY B, ZAHEER A. Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133-1156.
[20] 游达明,马北玲.关系契合对知识迁移与突破性创新绩效的影响研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(12):3103-3112.
[21] ZAHRA S A, NEUBAUM D A, HUSE M. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance system[J]. Journal of Management,2000,26(5):947-977.
[22] 阳银娟,陈劲.开放式创新中市场导向对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):110-113.
[23] BROUWER E, KlEINKNECHT A. Innovative output and a firm′s propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data[J]. Research Policy,1999,28(6):611-620.
[24] ATUAHENE-GIMA, KWAKU. Resolving the capability——rigidity paradox in new product innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing,2005,69(4):61-83.
[25] 孟丁,唐国华.技术创新战略开放度对企业技术创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(6):34-46. |
|
|
|
