|
|
Research on the Influence of Organizational Inertia on Enterprise Technological Innovation Investment |
Liu Ligang, Li Qi |
(Business School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China) |
|
|
Abstract With the vigorous development of digital technology, innovation is the first motivation to ensure the vitality of enterprise development.This article uses the 2010-2018 Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies as a research sample, and applies the resource-based theory, dynamic capability theory, and institutional-based theory to explore the role of organizational inertia in promoting technological innovation investment.The results show that: organizational inertia can effectively promote enterprise technological innovation investment to a certain extent; the positive effect of organizational inertia on enterprise technological innovation investment is partly achieved through the mediator of dynamic ability.When the organizational inertia degree is high and the dynamic ability is strong, the enterprise technological innovation investment will also increase; the institutional environment plays a positive role in strengthening the positive relationship between organizational inertia and enterprise technological innovation investment.The better the institutional environment facing the enterprise, the stronger the effect of organizational inertia on enterprise technological innovation investment.
|
Received: 25 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈冬梅,王俐珍,陈安霓.数字化与战略管理理论——回顾、挑战与展望[J].管理世界,2020,36(5):220-236+20.[2] 吴画斌,许庆瑞,李杨.创新引领下企业核心能力的培育与提高——基于海尔集团的纵向案例分析[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(5):28-37.[3] 林海芬,尚任.组织惯例对组织创新的悖论性作用机理研究[J].南开管理评论,2020,23(1):62-74.[4] DOOLEY K.Routine rigidity and environmental sustainability: why rational innovations are regularly ignored [J].Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(1): 70-81.[5] JOSEPH J, GABA V.Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: a retrospective and road map for research [J].Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(1): 267-302.[6] BASHIR M, VERMA R.Internal factors & consequences of business model innovation [J].Management Decision, 2019, 57(1): 262-290.[7] EBBEN J J,JOHNSON A C.Efficiency, flexibility, or both?evidence linking strategy and performance in small business [J].Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26: 1249-1259.[8] KLEINKNECHT R, HAMMAD, MULLER A R, et al.An attention-based view of short-termism: the effects of organizational structure [J].European Management Journal, 2020, 38(2): 244-254.[9] FUENTELSAZ L, GONZALEZ C, MAICAS J P.Formal institutions and opportunity entrepreneurship: the contingent role of informal institutions [J].Business Research Quarterly, 2019, 22(1): 5-24.[10] 杨震宁,赵红.中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境、“竞合”关系与创新绩效[J].管理世界,2020,36(2):139-160.[11] 程露,苏敬勤,吕一博.组织惯性:理论评述与研究框架构建[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(6):153-160.[12] HANNANMT, FREEMAN J.Structural inertia and organizational change [J].American Sociological Review, 1984(8): 149-164.[13] 曾萍,刘洋,吴小节.政府支持对企业技术创新的影响——基于资源基础观与制度基础观的整合视角[J].经济管理,2016,38(2):14-25.[14] SHI X X, ZHANG Q P.Inbound open innovation and radical innovation capability the moderating role of organizational inertia [J].Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2018, 31(3): 581-597.[15] KUMP B, ENGELMANN A, KESSLER A, et al.Toward a dynamic capabilities scale: measuring organizational sensing, seizing, and transforming capacities [J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2019, 28(5): 1149-1172.[16] TEECE D J, PISANO G, DOSI G, et al.Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.[17] 吴航.动态能力的维度划分及对创新绩效的影响——对Teece经典定义的思考[J].管理评论,2016,28(3):76-83.[18] SABAHI S, PARAST M M.Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective [J].International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, 2020, 23(3): 254-269.[19] 黄丽英,何乐融.家族所有权与企业国际化:制度环境的调节作用[J].广东财经大学学报,2020,35(2):35-45+102.[20] TANG Y L, HU X Y, PETTI C, et al.Institutional incentives and pressures in Chinese manufacturing firms' innovation [J].Management Decision, 2020, 58(5): 812-827.[21] MA X, TONG T W, FITZA M.How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? evidence from fortune global 500 corporations' investment in China[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2013, 44(1): 66-87.[22] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019:216-223.[23] 袁建国,程晨,后青松.环境不确定性与企业技术创新——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(10):60-69.[24] 闵亦杰,陈志军,李荣.家族涉入与企业技术创新[J].外国经济与管理,2016,38(3):86-98+112.[25] 王晓艳,温东子.机构投资者异质性、创新投入与企业绩效——基于创业板的经验数据[J].审计与经济研究,2020,35(2):98-106.[26] 潘敏,袁歌骋.金融中介创新对企业技术创新的影响[J].中国工业经济,2019(6):117-135.[27] 刘海建,周小虎,龙静.组织结构惯性、战略变革与企业绩效的关系:基于动态演化视角的实证研究[J].管理评论,2009,21(11):92-100.[28] 连燕玲,周兵,贺小刚,等.经营期望、管理自主权与战略变革[J].经济研究,2015,50(8):31-44.[29] TEECE D J.Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance [J].Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350.[30] WU L Y.Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms [J].Journal of Business Research, 2007, 60(5): 549-555.[31] 盛宇华,蒋后卿.高科技企业技术多元化与企业绩效的关系研究——动态能力的调节作用[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(2):13-21.[32] 孙慧,张双兰.国际化背景下动态能力与企业创新绩效的关系研究——来自中国高技术企业的经验证据[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(11):35-43.[33] 刘耀龙,黄晓丽,段锦.技术多元化、动态能力对企业二元式创新的影响——基于中国汽车企业面板数据[J].企业经济,2017,36(7):125-133.[34] 严若森,吴梦茜.二代涉入、制度情境与中国家族企业创新投入——基于社会情感财富理论的研究[J].经济管理,2020,42(3):23-39.[35] 马连福,王丽丽,张琦.混合所有制的优序选择:市场的逻辑[J].中国工业经济,2015(7):5-20.[36] 党兴华,魏龙,闫海.技术创新网络组织惯性对双元创新的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(9):1432-1440.[37] 胡国柳,赵阳,胡珺.D&O保险、风险容忍与企业自主创新[J].管理世界,2019,35(8):121-135.[38] 杨道广,王佳妮,陈丽蓉.“矫枉过正”抑或“合理管控”?——内部控制在企业创新中的作用[J].经济管理,2019,41(8):113-129.[39] 吴崇,黄彩虹.组织惯性两面性对OFDI企业创新绩效的影响——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(4):106-115.[40] 海本禄,高庆祝,等.高管过度自信、研发投入跳跃与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(12):136-145. |
|
|
|