|
|
|
| The Study on Military and Civilian Integration,Government Scientific and Technological Support and Technological Innovation Efficiency |
| Sun Yue1,Zhao Qing2,3 |
| （1.College of Marxism,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China;2.China Business Executives Academy DaLian,Dalian 116086,China;3.Antai College of Economics and Management ,Shanghai JiaoTong University,Shanghai 200230,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Through spatial data analysis methods,the distribution pattern of military-civilian integration,government science and technology support,and technological innovation efficiency across provinces in China is examined.Research shows that all three have significant positive spatial correlations,ie,positive spatial spillover effects,and in different regions.As a result of the formation of local agglomeration space,there is a phenomenon of high and low non-equilibrium “clubs”.Based on the spatial error model and spatial lag model,the empirical test of the impact of military-civil integration and government science and technology support on the efficiency of technological innovation shows that:from the perspective of the country and regions,military integration and government scientific and technological support can all significantly promote the efficiency of technological innovation.And there are obvious interactions between the two,which can exert their complementary effects and further promote the efficiency of technological innovation.At the same time,the study finds that the influence of military-civil integration and government science and technology support in different regions on the efficiency of technological innovation is quite different.Western region role of military-civilian integration and government science and technology support in promoting the efficiency of technological innovation is more obvious than in the eastern and central regions; some other factors that affect the efficiency of technological innovation are analyzed.
|
|
Received: 15 February 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 易信,刘凤良.金融发展、技术创新与产业结构转型——多部门内生增长理论分析框架[J].管理世界,2015(10):24-39.[2] 鲁桐,党印.投资者保护、行政环境与技术创新:跨国经验证据[J].世界经济,2015(10):99-124.[3] KOGAN L,PAPANIKOLAOU D,SERU A,et al.Technological innovation,resource allocation,and growth[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2017,132(2):665-712.[4] 张明亲,谢立仁,张冬敏.基于ANT的军民融合技术创新动力机制研究[J].西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）,2015(5):48-53.[5] 赵黎明,孙健慧,张海波.基于微分博弈的军民融合协同创新体系技术共享行为研究[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(3):183-191.[6] 彭春丽,李湘黔.军民融合区域创新网络研究[J].科学管理研究,2017(4):47-51.[7] 胡红安,刘丽娟.我国军民融合产业创新协同度实证分析——以航空航天制造产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015(3):121-126.[8] 聂鸣,曾赤阳,丁秀好.不同政府科技资助与区域R&D产出的关系研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(10):1468-1475.[9] 郑烨,吴建南.政府支持行为何以促进中小企业创新绩效?——一项基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(10):41-54.[10] 肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014(4):71-80.[11] 李平,刘利利.政府研发资助、企业研发投入与中国创新效率[J].科研管理,2017,38(1):21-29.[12] 毛其淋,许家云.政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响——基于补贴强度“适度区间”的视角[J].中国工业经济,2015(6):94-107.[13] 吴晓飞.科技支持、补贴陷阱与区域创新能力[J].财贸研究,2016(5):99-106.[14] 鲁元平,王品超,朱晓盼.城市化、空间溢出与技术创新——基于中国264个地级市的经验证据[J].财经科学,2017(11):78-89.[15] WANG Y,NING L,LI J,et al.Foreign direct investment spillovers and the geography of innovation in Chinese regions:the role of regional industrial specialization and diversity[J].Regional Studies,2016,50(5):805-822.[16] 白俊红,蒋伏心.协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效[J].经济研究,2015(7):174-187.[17] 王维,陈杰,毛盛勇.基于十大分类的中国资本存量重估:1978～2016年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017(10):60-77.[18] 湛泳,赵纯凯.资本市场发展、军民融合与产业结构优化升级[J].南开经济研究,2016(5):36-54.[19] PIJNENBURG K,KHOLODILIN K A.Do regions with entrepreneurial neighbours perform better?a spatial econometric approach for German regions[J].Regional Studies,2014,48(5):866-882.[20] 魏章进,宋时蒙.我国R&D资源配置水平的空间差异及其分布的动态演进[J].广东财经大学学报,2017,32(3):4-15.[21] 邵帅,李欣,曹建华,等.中国雾霾污染治理的经济政策选择——基于空间溢出效应的视角[J].经济研究,2016(9):73-88.[22] 蔡晓慧,茹玉骢.地方政府基础设施投资会抑制企业技术创新吗——基于中国制造业企业数据的经验研究[J].管理世界,2016(11):32-52.[23] TONE K.Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA:a slacks-based measure (SBM) approach[R].GRIPS Research Report Series,2003.[24] 常晓然,周全,吴晓波.我国54个城市的创新效率比较研究:基于包含非期望产出的SBM-NDEA模型[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(1):9-18. |
|
|
|
