|
|
The Impact of Paradox Mindset on Employees′ Innovative Performance: The Role of Employees′ Boundary Spanning Behavior and Relationship Conflict |
Zhang Bainan,Xu Shiyong,Wang Jixin |
(School of Labor and Human Resources,The Center of Human Resource Development and Evaluation,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China) |
|
|
Abstract Based on paired data with 375 subordinates and 92 leaders at 3 time points and from the viewpoint of individual and team motivation integrative theoretical model,this study explores the effects of employees′ paradox mindset on innovative performance,including the moderating effect of relationship conflict and the mediating effect of employees′ boundary spanning behavior.The results of analysis indicate that employees′ paradox mindset has positive effect on their innovative performance and such relationship is mediated by employees′ boundary spanning behavior; relationship conflict negatively moderates the positive relationship between employees′ paradox mindset and employees′ boundary spanning behavior,such relationship is relatively stronger when relationship conflict is low,and is relatively lower when relationship conflict is high.Besides,relationship conflict moderates the mediating effect of employees′ boundary spanning behavior on the relationship between employees′ paradox mindset and innovative performance,that is,such mediating effect is relatively stronger with low relationship conflict and relatively weaker with high relationship conflict.
|
Received: 24 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郭衍宏.领导者追随反原型对员工创造力的影响:工作激情与社会自我效能感的作用[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(21):134-141. [2] MIRON-SPEKTOR E,EREZ M.Looking at creativity through a paradox lens: deeper understanding and new insights[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2017:434-451. [3] SMITH W K,LEWIS M W.Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing[J].Academy of Management Review,2011,36(2):381-403. [4] MIRONSPEKTOR E,INGRAM A,KELLER J,et al.Microfoundations of organizational paradox: the problem is how we think about the problem[J].Academy of Management Journal,2018,61(1):26-45. [5] SMITH W K,TUSHMAN M L.Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams[J].Organization Science,2005,16(5):522-536. [6] SHALLEY C E,GILSON L L.What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity.[J].Leadership Quarterly,2004,15(1):33-53. [7] MIRONSPEKTOR E,GINO F,ARGOTE L.Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2011,116(2):229-240. [8] CHEN G,KANFER R.Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2006,27:223-267. [9] ANCONA D G,CALDWELL D F.Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1992,37(4):634-665.〖HT5”K〗〖WT8.5BZ〗[10] MARRONE J A.Team boundary spanning: a multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future[J].Journal of Management,2010,36(4):911-940.[11] MARRONE J A,TESLUK P E,CARSON J B.A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1423-1439.[12] CHOI J N.External activities and team effectiveness: review and theoretical development[J].Small Group Research,2002,33(2):181-208.[13] De DREU C K W,NIJSTAD B A.Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: threat rigidity versus motivated focus.[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2008,95(3):648-661.[14] De WIT F R C,JEHN K A,SCHEEPERS D.Task conflict,information processing,and decision-making: the damaging effect of relationship conflict[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2013,122(2):177-189.[15] SCOTT S G,BRUCE R A.Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace[J].Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(3):580-607.[16] MIRON-SPEKTOR E,EREZ M,NAVEH E.The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(4):740-760.[17] JANSSEN O,DE VLIERT E V,WEST M A.The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2004,25(2):129-145.[18] LEUNG A K Y,LIOU S,MIRONSPEKTOR E,et al.Middle ground approach to paradox: within-and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2018,114(3):442-464.[19] ROTHMAN N B,MELWANI S.Feeling mixed,ambivalent,and in flux: the social functions of emotional complexity for leaders[J].Academy of Management Review,2017,42(2):259-282.[20] ROTHMAN N B,PRATT M G,REES L,et al.Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes[J].The Academy of Management Annals,2017,11(1):33-72.[21] LIU S,JIANG K,CHEN J,et al.Linking employee boundary spanning behavior to task performance: the influence of informal leader emergence and group power distance[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management,2018,29(12):1879-1899.[22] ANDRIOPOULOS C,LEWIS M W.Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation[J].Organization Science,2009,20(4):696-717.[23] LOMRANZ J,BENYAMINI Y.The ability to live with incongruence: aintegration—the concept and its operationalization[J].Journal of Adult Development,2016,23(2):79-92.[24] IBARRA H.Network centrality,power,and innovation involvement: determinants of technical and administrative roles[J].Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(3):471-501.[25] AMABILE T M,PRATT M G.The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress,making meaning [J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2016,36:157-183.[26] JEHN K A.A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(2):256-282.[27] JEHN K A,MANNIX E A.The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(2):238-251.[28] MARINEAU J E,HOOD A C,LABIANCA G.Multiplex conflict: examining the effects of overlapping task and relationship conflict on advice seeking in organizations[J].Journal of Business and Psychology,2018,33(5):595-610.[29] DREU D C K W.When too little or too much hurts: evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams[J].Journal of Management,2006,32(1):83-107.[30] 向常春,龙立荣.团队内冲突对团队效能的影响及作用机制[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(5):781-789.[31] De WIT F R C,GREER L L,JEHN K A.The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis.[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(2):360-390.[32] 陈建勋,郑雪强,王涛.“对事不对人”抑或“对人不对事”——高管团队冲突对组织探索式学习行为的影响[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(5):91-103.[33] 张涛,刘延平,赖斌慧.团队冲突和团队信任对团队心智模式形成影响的实证研究[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008,7(4):58-63.[34] DREU C K W D,WEINGART L R.Task versus relationship conflict,team performance,and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(4):741-749.[35] SAMER F,AIMIN Y.Boundary work in knowledge teams[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,94(3):604-617.[36] JAMES L R,DEMAREE R G,WOLF G.Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1984,69(1):85-98.[37] PREACHER K J,SELIG J P.Monte carlo method for assessing multilevel mediation: an interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects in 1-1-1 multilevel models[M/OL].http://quantpsy.org,2019.[38] 刘东,张震,汪默.被调节的中介和被中介的调节:理论构建与模型检验[M].北京: 北京大学出版社,2012:553-587.[39] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.[40] SCHAD J,LEWIS M W,RAISCH S,et al.Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward[J].Academy of Management Annals,2016,10(1):1-60.[41] CHEN G,KIRKMAN B L,KANFER R,et al.A multilevel study of leadership,empowerment,and performance in teams[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(2):331-346.[42] BYUN G,KARAU S J,DAI Y,et al.A three-level examination of the cascading effects of ethical leadership on employee outcomes: a moderated mediation analysis[J].Journal of Business Research,2018,88:44-53.[43] KARK R,PRESER R,ZION-WALDOKS T.From a politics of dilemmas to a politics of paradoxes: feminism,pedagogy,and women’s leadership for social change[J].Journal of Management Education,2016,40(3):293-320.[44] DENG H,LEUNG K,LAM C K,et al.Slacking off in comfort: a dual-pathway model for psychological safety climate[J].Journal of Management,2019,45(3):1114-1144. |
|
|
|