|
|
The Impact of Alliance Portfolio Configuration on Enterprise |
Liu Yu1,2,Shao Yunfei2,Kang Jian3 |
(1. School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; |
|
|
Abstract In the era of globalization and competition, it has become an urgent need for modern enterprises to promote their innovation performance to enhance their competitiveness. In the era of knowledge sharing, alliance configuration has become a development model for modern enterprises to effectively obtain external resources through knowledge sharing. In order to find out the impact of alliance configuration on enterprise innovation performance, this study introduces knowledge sharing variables, constructs a hypothetical model that reflects the relationship between alliance composition, enterprise innovation performance, and knowledge sharing, and verifies the validity of the model through empirical analysis. Then the interaction mechanism between the three is revealed.Research shows that the size, diversity and network density of alliance portfolio have a positive impact on enterprise innovation performance, while knowledge sharing has a positive adjustment between alliance portfolio configuration and enterprise innovation performance. Therefore, enterprises should find alliance partners according to their own needs, and strengthen exchanges and cooperation with enterprises or organizations in different industries and different fields to promote knowledge sharing between them. At the same time, it is necessary to continuously improve the mutual trust of alliance members, establish a stable knowledge sharing platform and mechanism, and finally achieve the goal of improving the innovation performance of enterprises.
|
Received: 26 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 于晓敏.中国情境下知识共享与企业创新绩效建关系的元分析[J].技术经济,2017(3):46-53.[2] 陈涛,朱智洺,王铁男.组织记忆、知识共享与企业绩效[J].研究与发展管理,2015(2):43-55.[3] 周佳,陈劲,梅亮.联盟组合:源起、研究前沿和理论框架[J].外国经济与管理,2017(6):83-97,128.[4] BAUM J A C, CALABRESE T, SILVERMAN B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups performance in Canadian biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000(2):267-294.[5] 董微微.联盟组合的形成机理研究——基于复杂网络视角[J].工业技术经济,2017(5):126-130.[6] HAGEDOORN JOHN,CLOODT MYRIAM. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?[J].Research Policy,2003(8):1365-1379.[7] 李敏,刘晨韵,程杨.网络位置与高新技术企业创新绩效——以江西省为例[J].华东经济管理,2017(8):25-33.[8] 郑烨,杨若愚,姬晴晴.企业创新绩效国内外研究文献的十五年评述与展望[J].中国科技论坛,2017(3):73-80.[9] 张玉臣,吕宪鹏.高新技术企业创新绩效影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2013(12):58-65.[10] 赵喜洋,刘雅琴.湖北省高新技术企业科技企业创新绩效评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017(22):133-140.[11] 余泳,陈龙,王筱.中国区域高技术产业企业创新绩效测度与评价——基于因子分析和空间计量模型的实证分析[J].西安财经学院学报,2015(2):39-46.[12] 关皓元,梁勤儒,谷雨.区域创新环境对广东工业专业镇企业创新绩效影响实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2016(9):94-99.[13] WANG S,NOE R A. Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research[J]. Human Resource Management Review,2010(2):115-131.[14] SCHIUMA G,MOUSTAGHFIR K.Knowledge, learning, and innovation: research and perspectives[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2013(8):495-510.[15] 周永红,吴银燕,宫春梅.基于企业联盟的知识共享模式分析[J].情报理论与实践,2014(12):46,57-60.[16] 谢卫红,屈喜凤,李忠顺,等.知识共享国内研究综述[J].现代情报,2014(4):170-176.[17] 周城雄.隐性知识与显性知识的概念辨析[J].情报理论与实践,2004(2):127-129.[18] 魏道江,李慧民,康承业.基于解释结构模型的知识共享影响因素分析[J].情报科学,2015(7):92-97.[19] 倪国栋,黄付帅,张天宇,等.组织内部知识共享影响因素之主体因素研究综述[J].图书馆理论与实践,2015(10):21-25.[20] 倪国栋,冯彤瑶,陈子豪,等.组织内部知识共享影响因素之环境因素研究综述[J].图书馆理论与实践,2015(10):22-26.[21] HOFFMANN W H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007(8),827-856.[22] 徐建中,武建龙.联盟组合研究评述[J].软科学,2013(7):118-122.[23] 余菲菲.联盟组合多样性对技术创新路径的影响研究——基于科技型中小企业的跨案例分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014(4):111-120.[24] JIANG R J, TAO Q T, SANTORD M D. Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010(10):136-144.[25] MOURI NACEF, SARKAR M B, FRYE MELISSA. Alliance Portfolios and shareholder value in post-IPO firms: the moderating roles of portfolio structure and firm-level uncertainty[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2012(3):355-371.[26] CUI ANNA S, O CONNOR GINA. Alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing,2012(4):23-43.[27] ROWLEY T. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000(21):369-386.[28] 张红娟,谭劲松.联盟网络与企业创新绩效:跨层次分析[J].管理世界,2014(3):163-169.[29] 谢永平,毛雁征,张浩淼.组织间信任、网络结构和知识存量对网络企业创新绩效的影响分析——以知识共享为中介[J].科技进步与对策,2011(24):172-176.[30] 李顺才,邹珊刚,常荔.知识存量与流量:内涵、特征及其相关性分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2001(4):42-45.[31] 方晓波.知识流通与企业创新绩效关系研究——以在孵科技型小微企业为例[J].技术经济与管理研究,2015(2):25-28.[32] 简兆权,刘荣,招丽珠.网络关系、信任与知识共享对技术企业创新绩效的影响研究[J].研究与发展管理,2010(2):64-71.[33] 江玮,王奎.战略联盟组合与企业绩效的关系研究——基于创业机会理论的视角[J].厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2014(6):64-73.[34] 龙立荣.层级回归方法及其在社会科学中的应用[J].教育研究与实验,2004(1):51-56. |
|
|
|