|
|
The Holistic Governance of Integrity in Research |
Wei Huaian,Wei Bin |
(College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China) |
|
|
Abstract It is of practical urgency and theoretical value to accelerate the construction of integrity mechanism in research. From the perspective of research ecosystem, this paper makes a descriptive analysis of the main manifestations and new characteristics of integrity in research. Through the conceptual model and typical case interpretation of the inducing factors and generating mechanism of scientific research honesty, this paper reveals the overall logic of integrity in research. Accordingly, a holistic governance scheme is proposed, which integrates classification and precise implementation of policies, and provides a reference for the construction of long-term mechanism of integrity in research.
|
Received: 06 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] IVAN ORANSKY, ADAM MARCUS.Harvard and the Brigham call for more than 30 retractions of cardiac stem cell research[EB/OL].https://www.statnews.com/2018/10/14/harvard-brigham-retractions-stem-cell/. [2] 王嘉兴.青年长江学者与她“404”的论文[N].中国青年报,2018-10-24:10.[3] 叶继元.以学术规范促进学术创新[J].图书馆论坛,2019,39(3):1.[4] MELISSA S ANDERSON,NICHOLAS H STENECK.The problem of plagiarism[J]. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations,2010,29(1).[5] 黄军英.美国政府在科研诚信体系建设中的作用研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(12):254-259.[6] 蒋美仕,唐莉.论科学社会建制的主体结构[J].中南大学学报:社会科学版,2009,15(5):597-603+618.[7] GERT HELGESSON, STEFAN ERIKSSON. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers[J]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,2018,21(3).[8] 王英杰.改进学术环境,扼制研究不端行为——以美国为例[J].比较教育研究,2010,32(1):1-6.[9] 方玉东,方纪坤,张莉莉,等.学术不端行为成因研究综述[J].中国高校科技,2011(11):15-17.[10] HORBACH S P J M,HALFFMAN W. Promoting virtue or punishing fraud: mapping contrasts in the language of'scientific integrity'[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2017,23(6).[11] 董建龙,任洪波.国外加强科研诚信建设的经验与启示[J].中国科学基金,2007(4):223-228.[12] 蒯强.法国倡导科研诚信和反对学术不端行为的举措[J].复旦教育论坛,2007(5):81-84.[13] 解本远,贺晓慧.美国科研治理模式的演变及启示[J].首都师范大学学报:社会科学版,2018(5):68-74.[14] OSTP. Federal research misconduct policy[EB/OL]. The Office of Research Integrity.https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy.[15] 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅.关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见[N].人民日报,2018-05-31.[16] 中华人民共和国科学技术部.国家科技计划实施中科研不端行为处理办法(试行)[J].司法业务文选,2006(40):24-29.[17] 中国科学院.关于加强科研行为规范建设的意见[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(2):204-205.[18] 中国工程院.中国工程院院士违背科学道德行为处理办法[EB/OL].科学网.http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/9/388277.shtm.[19] 360百科.科学研究[EB/OL].https://baike.so.com/doc/5978478-6191439.html.[20] 孔艳,张铁明.学术不端研究综述及建立遏制学术不端的“第三类法庭”[J].编辑学报,2013,25(5):422-426.[21] 常亚平,蒋音播,阎俊.基于组织因素的高校学术不端行为影响因素的敏感性分析[J].管理学报,2009,6(2):264-270.[22] HARVEY MARCOVITCH. Misconduct by researchers and authors[J]. Gaceta Sanitaria,2007,21(6).[23] MARK B MYCYK. Maintaining the public trust in journals with ethical publishing[J]. Journal of Medical Toxicology,2017,13(4).[24] 穆荣平.遏制浮躁风气是科技强国关键 须重点解决四问题[N/OL].中国新闻网,[2012-08-19].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2012/08-19/4117186.shtml.[25] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(2):268-274.[26] 教育部.教育部公开曝光4起违反教师职业行为十项准则典型案例[EB/OL].中华人民共和国教育部网站[2019-04-03].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201904/t20190403_376596.html.[27] 王景烁,郭晓阳,安凤仪.法学专家搞不定学术打假——谁来判定论文抄袭[N/OL].中国青年报,[2019-04-03].http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2019-04/03/nw.D110000zgqnb_20190403_2-07.htm.[28] 俞可平.衡量国家治理体系现代化的基本标准[N].南京日报,2013-12-10(A07).[29] 竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008(10):52-58. |
|
|
|