|
|
Study on the Spatial Patterns of Innovation Efficiency of High-tech Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt |
Du Yu1,2,Huang Cheng3,4 |
(1.School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University;2.Center of Regional Economic Research,Wuhan University;3.Institute Central China Development,Wuhan University;4.China Institute for Development Strategy and Planning,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China) |
|
|
Abstract As an important carrier to implement the innovation-driven strategy and promote the transformation of old and new kinetic energy, high-tech manufacturing industry is the key to promoting the Yangtze River Economic Belt to become a new force for the high-quality development of China's economy. This paper uses variable returns to scale input-oriented NSBM model to measure the overall and two-stage efficiency of high-tech manufacturing innovation in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2011 to 2016, and explore the spatial characteristics and internal mechanism of efficiency evolution. The results show that the overall efficiency and stage efficiency of high-tech manufacturing innovation characterized by the spatial differentiation of the gradients of the upper and middle reaches. The downstream areas is in the adjustment period of the allocation to promote the transformation and upgrading. The characteristics of “high and high” innovation efficiency. The middle and upper regions are in the painful period of extensive agglomeration and intensify factor mismatch, showing the low agglomeration and low efficiency. The low efficiency of technology research is the main reason for the low efficiency of innovation in high-tech manufacturing. The central collapse and local inefficiency caused by “input-oriented” and “association mismatch” will intensify regional efficiency differentiation and eventually become global inefficiency. To change the disadvantages of high efficiency and overall inefficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and achieve efficiency changes, it is necessary to strengthen regional science and technology cooperation mechanisms, improve market technology service systems, and establish quality-oriented research and development goals.
|
Received: 20 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 胡亚茹,陈丹丹.中国高技术产业的全要素生产率增长率分解——兼对“结构红利假说”再检验[J].中国工业经济,2019(2):136-154.[2] 韩兵,苏屹,李彤,等.基于两阶段DEA的高技术企业技术创新绩效研究[J].科研管理,2018(3):11-19.[3] 孙早,徐远华.信息基础设施建设能提高中国高技术产业的创新效率吗?——基于2002—2013年高技术17个细分行业面板数据的经验分析[J].南开经济研究,2018(2):72-92.[4] 陈元志,朱瑞博.不同所有制企业技术创新效率的比较研究——面向大中型工业企业和高新技术企业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2018(8):188-189.[5] 高新才,朱泽钢.资源依赖与高技术产业技术创新效率——基于SFA与中介变量法的研究[J].西北大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2017(1):106-113.[6] 刁秀华,李姣姣,李宇.高技术产业的企业规模质量、技术创新效率及区域差异的门槛效应[J].中国软科学,2018(11):184-192.[7] 范晓莉,王振坡.中国高技术产业环境技术效率的动态演进及影响因素研究——基于空间面板模型的实证分析[J].现代财经,2017(9):89-101.[8] 邱兆林.高技术产业两阶段的创新效率[J].财经科学,2014(12):107-116.[9] 李晓龙,冉光和,郑威.科技服务业空间集聚与企业创新效率提升——来自中国高技术产业的经验证据[J].研究与发展管理,2017(4):1-10.[10] 许梦博,王明赫,翁钰栋.生产性服务业集聚有利于高技术产业的研发效率吗[J].经济问题探索,2018(2):135-141.[11] 张贵,王岩.要素扭曲、技术研发与效率损失——中国高技术产业实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019(1):59-66.[12] 屈文建,唐晶,陈旦芝.高新技术产业政策特征及演进趋势研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019(3):61-69.[13] 王庆金,王强,周雪.区域高技术产业研发活动效率评价及影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018(23):59-65.[14] 陈元志,朱瑞博.不同所有制企业技术创新效率的比较研究——面向大中型工业企业和高新技术企业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2018(8):188-189.[15] 刘秉镰,李锡庆.高技术产业研发效率研究——基于非合意产出SBM-DEA模型[J].经济与管理研究,2017(7):105-113.[16] 刘钒,邓明亮.基于改进超效率DEA模型的长江经济带科技创新效率研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(23):48-53.[17] 王伟,孙芳城.高技术产业三阶段创新效率变动研究——基于内部非期望产出的SBM模型与EBM模型[J].科技进步与对策,2018(3):67-71.[18] 杨武,田雪姣.中国高技术产业发展的科技创新驱动效应测度研究[J].管理学报,2018(8):1187-1195.[19] 肖仁桥,陈忠卫,钱丽.异质性技术视角下中国高技术制造业创新效率研究[J].管理科学,2018(1):48-68.[20] 陈莹文,王美强,陈银银,等.基于改进两阶段DEA的中国高技术产业研发创新效率研究[J].软科学,2018(9):14-18.[21] 李彦龙.税收优惠政策与高技术产业创新效率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018(1):60-76.[22] 余泳泽.我国高技术产业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究——基于价值链视角下的两阶段分析[J].经济科学,2009(4):62-74.[23] 叶锐,杨建飞,常云昆.中国省际高技术产业效率测度与分解——基于共享投入关联DEA模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012(7):3-17, 91.[24] 孙国锋,张婵,姚德文.大中型高技术企业创新效率测度与分解——基于DEA模型的实证分析[J].审计与经济研究,2016(3):111-119.[25] 范德成,李盛楠.考虑空间效应的高技术产业技术创新效率研究[J].科学学研究,2018(5):901-912.[26] KAO C, HWANG S N . Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J] European Journal of Operational Research, 2008(185):418-429.[27] 肖仁桥,钱丽,陈忠卫.中国高技术产业创新效率及其影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2012(5):85-98[28] 戚湧,刘军.长江经济带高技术产业创新效率评价及实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2017(17):60-69.[29] 杨庆,张贝尔,蒋旭东,等.长江经济带高技术产业发展效率评价及区域影响因素研究[J].宏观经济研究,2018(8):68-74.[30] 谢洪军,张慧.长江经济带高技术产业生产率变迁及其收敛性研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015(24):34-39.[31] 史安娜,王绕娟,张鎏依.长江经济带高技术产业创新要素集聚的空间溢出效应[J].河海大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(1):62-67, 91-92.[32] 成定平,淦苏美.长江经济带高技术产业投入产出效率分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017(3):325-332.[33] 刘树林,韩渭,韩书成.我国高技术产业创新效率的制度贡献及其异质性[J].科技进步与对策,2018(17):75-82.[34] GUAN J, CHEN K. Measuring the innovation production process: a cross-region empirical study of China's high-tech innovations [J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(5/6):348-358.[35] TONE K, TSUTSUI M. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(1):243-252.[36] COOPER W W, SEIFORD L M , TONE K. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, reference and dea-solver software[M].New York:Springer, 2007. |
|
|
|