|
|
Research on the Efficiency Measurement of the Effect of Science and Technology Project Funding on Output Performance of Paper |
Wang Feifei,Jia Chenran,Liu Junwan |
(Research Base of Beijing Modern Manufacturing Development, College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124,China) |
|
|
Abstract Based on the papers and scholars in the field of artificial intelligence explores the effect of the funding of science and technology projects on the output performance of paper. Specifically, the use of negative binomial regression analysis of different countries and sub-sectors of the type of funding, intensity, types of funding on the impact of citations and published journal level influence, found that the funding indicators can be positive on the quality of the paper,and there are differences in the effect of scholarship promotion in different regions and research directions.Using the tendency score method and linear regression models to measure the effectiveness of subsidized scholars' output performance improvement from the perspectives of the number of paper, cited and h index, find that funding can significantly improve the overall productivity and academic influence of scholars; and the number and the amount of the subsidized projects by Tobit regression measure have different effects on different different age group scholars,the results show that the increase of the number can improve the output performance of the scholars as a whole, and the increase of the amount can further expand the dynamic increase of output and influence. In view of this, relevant suggestions on funding improvement strategies and evaluation mechanism optimization are proposed.
|
Received: 26 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]俞征鹿, 马峥, 郭红,等. 中国科技计划项目论文产出和影响力分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2013(4):1-5.[2] JUE W, PHILIP S, BRAD W K. Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? an analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers[J].Plos One, 2015, 10(2): 727.[3] ZHAO S X, LOU W, TAN A M , et al. Do funded papers attract more usage[J].Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1):153-168.[4] 马亮, 吴建南, 时仲毅. 科研项目绩效的影响因素:医学科学基金面上项目的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(7):12-20.[5] VANECEK J. The effect of performance-based research funding on output of R&D results in the Czech Republic[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1):657-681.[6] ABDULLAH GK, RIGBY J, SHAPIRA P. The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: evidence from six smaller European countries[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(3):715-730.[7] 白玉, 郑童桐, 赵镇,等. 基于文献计量的国家自然科学基金资助效果分析:以南方医科大学为例[J]. 中国科学基金, 2016(4):340-345.[8] FEDDERKE J W, GOLDSCHMIDT M. Does massive funding support of researchers work?evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative [J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(2):467-482.[9] 宋志红, 郭艳新, 李冬梅. 科学基金资助提高科研产出了吗?——基于倾向得分分层法的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(1):116-121.[10]田人合, 张志强, 高志. 基于分段线性回归模型的科学家个人科研产出规律研究——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(1):106-116.[11] KYVIK S. Age and scientific productivity, differences between fields of learning[J]. Higher Education, 1990, 19(1):37-55.[12] SANDSTRM U. Research quality and diversity of funding: a model for relating research money to output of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 79(2):341-349.[13] JACOB B A, LEFGREN L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity[J]. J Public Econ, 2011, 95(9):1168-1177.[14] 缪亚军, 戚巍, 钟琪. 科学家学术年龄特征研究——基于学术生产力与影响力的二维视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(2):177-183.[15] 邱均平,赵蓉英,董克,等. 科学计量学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.[16] 盛丽娜, 顾欢. “影响因子百分位”与h指数、累积h指数对期刊的评价效力分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28(2):166-170.[17] 郭际, 吴先华, 吴崇. 基于DEA-Tobit模型的我国高校科技投入产出绩效评价及政策启示[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(23):65-70.[18] YEGROSYEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D'ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact?the different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(8):e0135095.[19] SINATRA R, WANG D, DEVILLE P, et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact[J]. Science, 2016, 354(12):39. |
|
|
|