|
|
|
| How Do Organizational Territorial Behavior of Scientific and Technological Talents Affects Turnover Intention: Based on the Moderating Mediating Model of Psychological Ownership and Marriage |
| Cheng Long1,2,Yu Haibo3,Zhang Lu4,An Ran5 |
| (1. Science and Technology Talent Exchange and Development Service Center, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100045, China;2.Strategic Talent Research Center，Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China；3.School of Government Management,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China；4.China Mobile Communications Group Beijing Co., Ltd., Beijing 10007, China;5.Beijing Petroleum Management Cadre College, Beijing 100096, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This study want to explain how do organizational territorial behavior of scientific and technological talents affects turnover intention from the perspective of resource conservation theory: based on mediation model with moderating effect of psychological ownership and marriage, it may has important meaning to human resource management practices. By questionnaire survey, 411valid data is collected from scientific and technological talents of hightech enterprises, universities and research institutes all over the country, making the following conclusions: 1. Organizational territorial behavior of scientific and technological talents has no significant direct impact on turnover intention, and psychological ownership has no mediating effect on it. 2. Considering the moderating effect of marriage, the higher the organizational territorial behavior is, the higher the turnover intention is. 3. In the moderating mediating role model, marriage status plays a mediating role between organizational territorial behavior and turnover intention. The organizational territorial behavior of unmarried groups negatively affects turnover intention through the mediating role of part of Organizational Psychological ownership, and positively affects turnover intention through direct impact mechanism.
|
|
Received: 25 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张佳良,袁艺玮,刘军.组织中的领地性研究:文献评述与研究展望[J]. 科技进步与对策,2017,34(24):154-160.
[2] 宋一晓,曹洲涛. 员工-组织关系视角下知识领地行为研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015,32(3):140-144.
[3] 张佳良,范雪灵,刘军. 组织领地行为的新探索——基于个体主义与集体主义文化对比视角[J].外国经济与管理,2018, 40(6):73-85.
[4] BROWN G, LAWRENCE T, ROBINSON S L. Territoriality in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3):577-594.
[5] 彭贺. 领地行为研究综述：组织行为学的新兴领域[J].经济管理, 2012, 34(1): 182-189.
[6] BROWN G. Claiming a corner at work: measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(1):44-52.
[7] BROWN G, CROSSLY C, ROBINSON S. Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: the critical role of trust in the work environment[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2014,67:463-485.
[8] 黄培伦,田在兰.员工离职意向影响因素述评[J].科技管理研究, 2006,5:153-155.
[9] MOBLEY W H. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977,62(2): 237-240.
[10] 储小平,倪婧.组织内领地性研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理, 2009,31(3):1-8.
[11] 朱沆,刘舒颖.心理所有权前沿研究述评[J].管理学报, 2011,5(8):784-790.
[12] 娜仁,刘洪.画地为牢:领地行为是否抑制创造力[J].财经论丛, 2018(2):86-94.
[13] PENG H E, PIERCE J. Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: relationship and outcomes[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2015,30(2):121-168.
[14] MELISSA G MAYHEW, NEALMASH KANASY, TOM BRAMBLE, et al. A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings[J].The Journal of Social Psychology, 2007, 147(5)：477-500.
[15] 刘芳,王浩.组织心理所有权与工作态度、行为和结果的关系研究[J].软科学, 2010,24（9）:124-128.
[16] 杨凤岐.心理所有权对雇员离职意愿中介作用的比较分析[J].中外企业家, 2010（6）:64-66.
[17] 黄海艳,李乾文.员工的领地行为研究——基于人口统计特征的视角[J].南京审计学院学报,2014, 11(1):62-69.
[18] 刘慧君,婚姻与心理福利的性别差异性分析[J].中国人口科学,2011（4）:33-43.
[19] VAN D L,PIERCE J L.Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(4):439-459.
[20] KONOVSKY M A,CROPANZANO R.Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991,76:698-707. |
|
|
|
