|
|
|
| The Quality Control Mechanism of Peer Review in Foreign Research Funding Agencies and its Enlightenment |
| Zhang Lujie1,Zhang Xiaoqiu2 |
| 1.School of Humanities and Social Science，University of Science and Technology in Beijing，Beijing 100083, China; 2.National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation，Beijing 100081，China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Peer review is a commonly used method of project appraisal for national research funding agencies. Due to the limitations of peer review itself, foreign research funding agencies to adopt a unique quality control measures. Since the establishment of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, there have been many beneficial explorations in improving the quality of peer review. Based on the analysis of the quality control mechanism of peer review in several typical countries, this paper summarizes and analyzes their respective characteristics and advantages, combined with the current actual situation in our country, and puts forward suggestions to strengthen the quality of peer review in our country.
|
|
Received: 14 November 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Zhang Lujie
|
|
|
|
［1］WOLD A，WESSELY SIMON.Peer review in grant applications:a systematic review［M］//F GODLEE,T JEFFERSON.Peer review in health sciences.London:BMJ Books,2003:14-44.
［2］STEPHEN S COLE,LEONARD RUBIN,JONATHAN R.Cole,peer review in the NSF:phase I of a study［M］.Washington,DC:National Academy of Sciences,1978.
［3］JONATHAN R COLE,STEPHEN S COLE.The committee on science and public policy(COSPUP):phase II of a study［M］.Washington,DC:National Academy of Sciences,1981.
［4］GAO.Peer review:reforms needed to ensure fairness in federal agency grant selection［Z］.GAO/PEMD-94-1,1994.
［5］ROYAL SOCIETY.Response to the RCUK consultation on the efficiency and effectiveness of peer review［EB/OL］.http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp.id=23912,2008-05-10.
［6］RAND.Alternatives to peer review in research project funding［Z］.2013.
［7］达里尔·E.楚宾，爱德华·J.哈克特.难有同行的科学：同行评议与美国科学政策［M］.谭文华,曾国屏,译.北京：北京大学出版社，2011：73-74.
［8］龚旭.美国国家科学基金会的同行评议制度及其启示［J］.中国基础科学，2004（6）：41.
［9］范英，郑永和，魏一鸣，等.海外科学基金评审方法与实践［M］.北京：科学出版社，2004：55.
［10］张鑫.科研项目同行评议中专家诚信体系建设研究［D］.天津：天津大学，2011.
［11］European Science Foundation.European peer review guide［R］.Member Organization，2011.
［12］王嘉.科技成果评估方法与指标体系的研究［D］.北京：中国矿业大学，2010.
［13］龚旭.科学政策与同行评议：中美科学制度与政策比较研究［M］.杭州：浙江大学出版社，2009：283-284.
［14］国家科技评估中心.国家自然科学基金2015年度绩效评价报告［R］.2016.
|
|
|
|
