|
|
|
| A Study on the Selection Validity of Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| Wang Futao1,2,Zhou Dandan1,Zhang Zhengang2,Yang Hongming3 |
| 1.School of Public Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China;2.School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China;3.School of Business Administration,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract On the basis of policy text analysis,this paper defined the change process of selection criteria and objectives of Chinese Academy of Sciences,and then determined selection validity index and put forward hypothesis based on the theory of the sociology of science scientific reward system. In units of faculty and the corresponding subject,it analyzed the identity of National Natural Science Award Winners,as well as the aacademician who won the National Natural Science Award from 1956 to 2015,the result showed that linkage exists between the National Natural Science Award and the selection of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Under current academician selection target,member of Chinese academy of sciences selection validity is good,but it defects selection goal setting. Whereby we recommend attention to the analysis of Sciences National Natural Science Award,so as to improve the accuracy of the assessment of the validity of the selection and to further strengthen the influence of the national science and technology awards for the academician selection,the prime minister of science and technology advisory committee should be set up.
|
|
Received: 24 October 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Wang Futao
|
|
|
|
［1］哈里特·朱克曼. 科学界的精英——美国的诺贝尔奖金获得者［M］. 周叶谦,冯世刚,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979:14.
［2］中国科学院.中国科学院院士章程［EB/OL］.http://www.casad.ac.cn/doc/14860.html.
［3］嘉实.众院士炮轰院士制度［N］.南方周末,2005-12-08(3).
［4］舒圣祥.李爱珍能否拉开院士制度改革序幕［N］.华夏时报,2007-05-18(2).
［5］于忠宁.优秀科学家落选院士之痛［N］.工人日报,2008-03-20(6).
［6］曹聪.中国的科学精英及其政治社会角色［J］.当代中国研究,2007(1).
［7］GISBERT JP,PANES J.Scientific publication,bibliometric indicators,and Hirsch's h-index［J］.Gastroenterol Hepatol,2009,32(3):140-149.
［8］ESPOSITO M.H-index:an index to quantify the impact of scientific research［J］.Eur J Oral Implantol,2010,3(1):3-4.
［9］王玉,许昌泰.中国科学院部分院士H指数分析［J］.现代情报,2010,30(10):23-25.
［10］雷二庆,陈红光.H指数评价中国科学家的适用性及影响因素分析——以2007年中国科学院增选院士候选人为例［J］.科研管理,2009,30(Z):84-89.
［11］徐飞,赵明.杰出科学家的国家认可机制探索——以中国科学院院士制度与国家自然科学奖励制度关联性为例［J］.学术界,2011(11):5-15.
［12］唐爱国.国家科技奖励是通向院士大门的敲门砖吗［J］.社会科学管理与评论,2012(3):31-36.
［13］李四光.新中国的科学事业是属于人民的［J］.科学大众,1954(2):41.
［14］中国科学院.中国科学院学部暂行组织规程［J］.科学通报,1955(7):44.
［15］中共中央文献研究室.建国以来重要文献选编（第五册）［M］.北京:中共中央文献出版社,1993:175.
［16］王忠俊.中国科学院史事汇要(1955)［M］.中国科学院院史文物征集委员会办公室,1995:39-40.
［17］中国科学院办公厅.中国科学院年报1981［R］.北京:中国科学院,1982:246.
［18］中国科学院办公厅.中国科学院年报1979［R］.北京:中国科学院,1980:181-182.
［19］中国科学院办公厅.中国科学院年报1990［R］.北京:中国科学院,1991:285.
［20］National Academy of Science.Membership overview［EB/OL］.http://www.nasonline.org/membership.
［21］JONATHAN R COLE,STEPHEN COLE.Social stratification in science［M］.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1973:75.
［22］中华人民共和国国务院.国家科学技术奖励条例［Z］.1999-05-23.
［23］邱均平,余厚强.科学家黄金年龄影响因素的综合分析［J］.情报杂志,2014,33(3):14.
［24］赵红州,蒋国华,郑文艺.论基础学科结构问题［J］.科学学研究,1989,7(4):17.
［25］庞景安.中国科学技术国际地位与影响报告［M］.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2009:139.
［26］刘立.基础研究政策的理论与实践［M］.北京:清华大学出版社,2007:262.
|
|
|
|
