反腐可以促进区域R & D资本存量积累吗

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100137

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY

2017, Vol. 34

Issue (11): 35-40 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100137

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Do Anti-corruption Promote the Regional R&D Capital Accumulation

Wang Yan¹,Shi Yongdong²

1.School of Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics;2.Research Center of Applied Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025,China

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1001 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In this paper we select provincial panel data of China as sample from 2005 to 2014. In consideration of legal institutions level, fiscal transparency, corruption motivation and government size, we explore the effects of Anti-corruption on R&D capital accumulation. This paper get the conclusions: ①The rise of Anti-corruption will led to the rise of R&D capital. ②The higher the level of legal, the greater the effect of Anti-corruption on the accumulation of R&D capital. ③ The higher the level of fiscal transparency, the greater the effect of Anti-corruption on the accumulation of R&D capital. ④ Higher wage of public officers can reduce corruption motivation, enhance the effect of Anti-corruption on the accumulation of R&D capital.⑤Larger government size will weaken the effect of Anti-corruption on the accumulation of R&D capital.

Key words： Anti-corruption Innovation R&D Legal Level Fiscal Transparency

Received: 25 November 2016

ZTFLH:

F124.3

Corresponding Authors: Wang Yan

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Yan
	Shi Yongdong

Cite this article:

Wang Yan,Shi Yongdong. Do Anti-corruption Promote the Regional R&D Capital Accumulation[J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(11): 35-40.

URL:

http://www.kjjb.org/EN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100137 OR http://www.kjjb.org/EN/Y2017/V34/I11/35

［1］江雅雯，黄燕，徐雯. 政治联系、制度因素与企业的创新活动［J］. 南方经济，2011(11)：3-15.
［2］李后建，张宗益. 地方官员任期、腐败与企业研发投入［J］. 科学学研究，2014，32(5)：744-757.
［3］齐结斌，安同良. 企业家精神、寻租活动与企业研发投入［J］. 华东经济管理，2014，28(5)：114-116.
［4］刘锦，王学军. 社会失范、地区腐败与企业创新［J］. 软科学，2015，29(11)：65-69.
［5］范允奇，徐玉生. 腐败、政府R&D投入与高技术产业技术创新效率［J］. 财贸研究，2014(6)：95-102.
［6］李后建，张剑. 腐败与企业创新:润滑剂抑或绊脚石［J］. 南开经济研究，2015(2)：24-58.
［7］董新兴，刘坤. 科研反腐与创新产出效率——来自中国高等学校的经验证据［J］. 上海财经大学学报，2015，17(1)：32-41.
［8］党力，杨瑞龙，杨继东. 反腐败与企业创新:基于政治关联的解释［J］. 中国工业经济，2015(7)：146-160.
［9］徐细雄，陈柯甫，淦未宇. 反腐败促进了企业创新吗——对企业R&D决策的实证检验［J］. 科技进步与对策，2016(18)：107-112.
［10］FAN C S,LIN C,TREISMAN D.Political decentralization and corruption: evidence from around the world ［J］. Journal of Public Economics, 2009, 93(1-2):14-34.
［11］黄寿峰，郑国梁. 财政透明度对腐败的影响研究——来自中国的证据［J］. 财贸经济，2015，36(3)：30-42.
［12］SCHULZE G G, SJAHRIR B S, ZAKHAROV N. Corruption in Russia［J］. Discussion Paper, 2013（10）:50-72.
［13］周黎安，陶婧. 政府规模、市场化与地区腐败问题研究［J］. 经济研究，2009(1)：57-69.
［14］SHLEIFER A, VISHNY R W. Corruption［J］. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1993, 108(3):599-617.
［15］杨涛. 法制反腐思路对策刍议［J］. 学习与探索，2013(12)：47-51.
［16］李春根，徐建斌. 中国财政预算透明与地区官员腐败关系研究［J］. 当代财经，2016(1)：19-28.
［17］TELLA R D, SCHARGRODSKY E. The role of wages and auditing during a crackdown on corruption in the city of buenos aires［J］. Journal of Law & Economics, 2003, 46(1):269-92.
［18］BARDHAN P. Corruption and development: a review of issues［J］. Journal of Economic Literature, 1997, 35(3):1320-1346.
［19］张杰，芦哲，郑文平，陈志远. 融资约束、融资渠道与企业R&D投入［J］. 世界经济，2012(10)：66-90.
［20］樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏. 中国市场化指数［M］. 北京：经济科学出版社，2011：42-53.
［21］SMITH J D. US political corruption and firm financial policies ［J］. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016,121(2):350-367.
［22］邵云飞，范群林，唐小我. 基于内生增长模型的区域创新能力影响因素研究［J］. 科研管理，2011，32(9)：28-34.