|
|
|
| Intellectual Property Protection, Technical Advantage and Entrepreneurial Quality: an Empirical Study based on Chinese Listed Returnees' Venture Enterprises in High-tech Industry |
| Zhu Jinsheng,Tan Yi |
| (School of Economics，Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Combined with the impact of intellectual property protection(ipp) in the external environment on high-tech enterprises, this paper discusses whether the technical advantages of high-level returnees contribute to high-quality entrepreneurship.The listed returnees′ enterprises in the high-tech industry from 2010-2018 are selected as the research samples in this paper. After calculating the overall technical advantage index and constructing a comprehensive index of entrepreneurial quality with the consideration of three dimensions of entrepreneurial performance, entrepreneurial development and entrepreneurial innovation based on the data of listed returnees′ enterprises in China's high-tech industry from 2010 to 2018, what the relationship between the technical advantages and entrepreneurial quality of returnees is and how the level of ipp impacts the technical advantages and entrepreneurial quality of returnees are discussed in an empirical test. The results indicate as follows：①returnees do have technological advantages in the high-tech industry;②the stronger the returnees ′technological advantages, the higher the entrepreneurial quality;③the regulatory effect of the level of ipp can positively improve the relationship between the technological advantages and entrepreneurial quality of returnees′enterprises, which means that the higher the level of ipp, the more significant the positive impact of technological advantages on entrepreneurial quality. However, when the level of ipp is at a low level, it is difficult to successfully transform technological advantages into enterprise performance, and the quality of entrepreneurship can not be guaranteed.
|
|
Received: 06 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] OUDAI,XIAOHUI LIU. Returnee entrepreneurs and firm performance in Chinese high-technology industries[J].International Business Review,2009,18(4):373-386.[2] 董洁林.“天生全球化”创业模式探讨:基于“千人计划”海归高科技创业的多案例研究[J].中国软科学,2013，27(4):26-38.[3] WENSONGBAI,MARTINJOHANSON,OSCAR MARTN MARTN. Knowledge and internationalization of returnee entrepreneurial firms[J]. Elsevier Ltd,2016.[4] 谷峰. 创业板上市公司质量评价体系研究[D].长春：吉林大学,2011.[5] LASZLOSZERB,ESTEBANLAFUENTE,KRISZTINAHORVATH,et al. The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem[J]. Routledge,2019,53(9).[6] CARMEN GUZMAN, FRANCISCO J SANTOS, MARíA DE LA O BARROSO. Cooperative essence and entrepreneurial quality: a comparative contextual analysis[J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,2020,91(1): 95-118.[7] 王舒扬,高旭东.何种人力资本对海归创业者更有效:管理还是技术[J].科研管理,2018,39(2):1-9. [8] 黎柯含, 郑文懿, 蒋沂峻.海归创业团队知识结构对企业绩效的调节作用研究[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2019，26(21):58-59，62.[9] 丁潇君, 杨秀智, 徐磊. 国际化董事会、研发操纵与创新绩效[J]. 财经论丛, 2020，35(5):94-103.[10] MICHAEL A HITT,LEONARDBIERMAN,KATSUHIKOSHIMIZU,RAHULKOCHHAR. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective[J]. Academy of Management,2001,44(1).[11] 陈健,柳卸林,邱姝敏,等.海归创业的外来者劣势和知识资本的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2017,35(9):1348-1358.[12] 李莉,闫斌,顾春霞.知识产权保护、信息不对称与高科技企业资本结构[J].管理世界,2014，29(11):1-9.[13] ZWEIG D,CHUNG S F,VANHONACKER W.Rewards of technology:Explaining China's reverse migration[J].Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2006, 7(4): 449-471.[14] 刘青,张超,吕若思,等.“海归”创业经营业绩是否更优:来自中国民营企业的证据[J].世界经济,2013,36(12):70-89.[15] 钟云华.新生代海归创业难的归因与对策[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2016,34(3):52-60+118.[16] 王重鸣, 薛元昊.知识产权创业能力的理论构建与实证分析：基于高技术企业的多案例研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014,44(3):58-70.[17] 陈怡安.制度环境对海归回流知识溢出效应影响有多大——来自中国的经验证据[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2019，16(4):131-159.[18] SCHNEIDER P H.International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights:a panel data study of developed and developing countries[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2005（78）: 529-547.[19] 董钰, 孙赫.知识产权保护对产业创新影响的定量分析：以高技术产业为例[J]. 世界经济研究, 2012，30(4):11-15，87.[20] 许家云,张玉,吴石磊.海归技术溢出、产业集聚与技术进步——中国制造业行业数据的实证检验[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2013,33(6):120-129.[21] 何丽敏,刘海波,张亚峰.知识产权保护与经济水平对技术创新的作用机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(24):136-142.[22] 郑玉.知识产权保护、R&D投入与企业绩效——基于中国制造业企业的实证[J].社会科学研究,2017，38(4):56-62.[23] 吴超鹏,唐菂.知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2016,51(11):125-139.[24] 云乐鑫, 杨俊, 张玉利.基于海归创业企业创新型商业模式原型的生成机制[J].管理学报, 2014, 11(3):367-375.[25] 国家知识产权局知识产权发展研究中心. 2018年中国知识产权发展状况评价报告[EB/OL][2019-7-11].http://www.cnipa.gov.cn/docs/20190624164519009878.pdf.[26] 杨春慧. 大学生创业质量评价体系的构建及创造性人格与创业质量的关系[D].昆明：云南师范大学,2017.[27] 万金,祁春节.改革开放以来中国农产品对外贸易比较优势动态研究——基于NRCA方法的分析[J].世界经济研究,2012，30(4):51-57+88.[28] 李维安,李慧聪,郝臣.高管减持与公司治理创业板公司成长的影响机制研究[J].管理科学,2013,26(4):1-12.[29] 高玉强,张宇.政府补贴对企业绩效的门槛效应研究——来自制造业民营上市公司的微观证据[J].重庆社会科学,2019(12):89-102.[30] 王华.更严厉的知识产权保护制度有利于技术创新吗[J].经济研究,2011,46(S2):124-135. |
|
|
|
