|
Abstract In contrast to the wellknown disruptive innovation theory, Christensen's methodology within developing his theory has not been paid any attention. Contrast the four phases of 30 management masters developing their theories in the Great Minds, this paper found that during the general research steps keeping with the four stages, Christensen has special contributions of his own: After distinguishing the exceptions form the anomalies, adopted the different solutions for the anomalies of different theoretical development stages; Basing on the induction, deduction and theoretical boundary questioning, three different forms of integrating the teaching and researching ware used in the different theory development state; Paid more attention to the research methodology, and used them to guide and strengthen his research actions; While showing the study, explained the reasons of the methodology or assumptions used in his works to enhance the credibility of the results and obtain more abroad effect. These findings can help us to reexamine the disruptive innovation theory from the perspective of research methodology, and also enlighten the researchers to focus on some helpful skills in our innovation activities.
|
|
|
| Fund:教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目（13YJA630001） |
|
|
|
