Research on the Processing Procedure of Research Misconduct:Comments on the "Rules for Investigation and Handling of Cases of Scientific Research Integrity (Trial)"
Wang Jixia,Yin Jiaxi
(School of Humanity and Social Science,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)
王霁霞,尹嘉希. 科研不端行为处理程序研究——兼评《科研诚信案件调查处理规则(试行)》[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(1): 141-149.
Wang Jixia,Yin Jiaxi. Research on the Processing Procedure of Research Misconduct:Comments on the "Rules for Investigation and Handling of Cases of Scientific Research Integrity (Trial)". SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2022, 39(1): 141-149.
[1] 和鸿鹏,齐昆鹏,王聪.科研不端定义的国际比较研究:表现形式与界定方式[J].自然辩证法研究,2020,36(5):73-78. [2] 王聪,刘玉强.我国高校科研诚信政策中的科研诚信概念研究[J].科学与社会,2020,10(2):127-141. [3] 刘兰剑,杨静.科研诚信问题成因分析及治理[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(21):112-117. [4] 史冬波,周博文.科研不端行为特征与治理对策:国家自然科学基金披露科研不端行为的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(3):106-110. [5] 常宏建,方玉东.我国科研不端行为法律规制体系:现状、问题与建构[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(24):89-93. [6] 和鸿鹏,陈雅玲.比较视角下的中国科研不端查处政策:兼评《科研诚信案件调查处理规则(试行)》[J].中国科学基金,2020,34(3):318-323.[7] HOOMAN MOMEN, LARAGH GOLLOGLY.Cross-cultural perspectives of scientific misconduct [J].Medicine and Law, 2007(3):409-416. [8] SPECE R G,BERNSTEIN C.Scientific misconduct and liability for the Acts of others[J].Medicine and Law,2007,26(3):477-491. [9] SOVACOOL B K.Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct[J].The American Journal of Bioethics,2005,5(5):W1-W7. [10] 徐靖.科研失信行为处理的程序法治规则[J].高校教育管理,2020,14(3):83-91.[11] 北京市第一中级人民法院(2017)京01行终277号二审行政判决书[Z].2017.[12] 浙江省杭州市中级人民法院(2017)浙01行初212号一审行政判决书[Z].2017. [13] 严燕.论学术不端法律规制的谦抑性[J].学术界,2016,31(5):111-119. [14] 徐靖.高等学校学术委员会与学位评定委员会的法律关系[J].高等教育研究,2019,40(2):47-54. [15] 王阳.美国科研诚信建设演变的制度逻辑与中国借鉴[J].自然辩证法研究,2020,36(7):52-58. [16] 刘军仪.美英科研诚信建设的实践与探索[M].北京:党建读物出版社,2016:36-37.[17] DAN L BURK.Research misconduct: deviance, due process, and the disestablishment of science[J].George Mason Independent Law Review,1995(2):305-350.[18] 42 CFR Parts 50 and 93:Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct[EB/OL].https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005.pdf.2020-1-2.[19] 45 CFR 689: Research Misconduct[EB/OL].https://www.nsf.gov/oig/_pdf/cfr/45-CFR-689.pdf.2020-1-2.[20] GARY S MARX.An overview of the research misconduct process and an analysis of the appropriate burden of proof[J].Journal of College and University Law,2016,42(2):311-374.[21] ROY G SPECE, CAROL BERNSTEIN.What is scientific misconduct, who has to (dis)prove it, and to what level of certainty[J].Medicine and Law, 2007,26(3): 493-510.[22] Board of Regents of State Colleges v.Roth ,408 U.S.564(1972) [EB/OL].https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/1971/71-162_01-18-1972.pdf.2020-01-02.[23] STEVEN G OLSWANG, BARBARA A LEE.Scientific misconduct: institutional procedures and due process considerations[J].Journal of College and University Law, 1984,11(1):51-64. [24] 周佑勇.作为过程的行政调查:在一种新研究范式下的考察[J].法商研究,2006,23(1):129-136. [25] 周佑勇.行政法的正当程序原则[J].中国社会科学,2004,25(4):115-124. [26] 危怀安,韦滨.科研诚信问题的整体性治理[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(21):106-111. [27] 董兴佩.学术不端行为惩戒立法论纲[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(5):26-32. [28] 姚荣.重申学术自由的内在与外在界限[J].高校教育管理,2019,13(2):89-100. [29] 史昱.中国科研诚信政策的演变与评价(1949—2017年)[J].中国软科学,2019,34(10):158-164.