数字平台如何赋能互补者创新——基于架构设计视角

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070762

科技进步与对策

2021, Vol. 38

Issue (12): 1-8 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070762

科技管理创新

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

数字平台如何赋能互补者创新——基于架构设计视角

梅景瑶¹,郑刚²,朱凌³

（1.浙江工业大学管理学院，浙江杭州 310014；2.浙江大学管理学院；3.浙江大学中国科教战略研究院，浙江杭州 310058）

How Can Digital Platforms Enable Complementors to Innovate

Mei Jingyao¹ ,Zheng Gang²,Zhu Ling³

（1.School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou310014,China; 2.School of Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;3.Institute of China's Science,Technology and Education Policy,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China）

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (5)

全文: PDF (1652 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要数字平台如何赋能互补者创新是当前产业界、学术界关注的热点和难点。鉴于此，从架构设计视角切入，以阿里云IoT平台、海尔U+平台和华为OceanConnect平台为案例研究对象，采用内容分析法，探索数字平台如何有效赋能互补者实现数字创新。研究发现：模块性、分层性和平台边界资源动态性是数字平台架构设计的关键维度：平台边界资源能够通过不断资源化过程提升平台功能、服务和产品多样性及广度，提升互补者创新的生成性，并通过动态收缩强化对互补者创新的控制，保证互补者创新的稳定性；分层性结合模块性架构设计能够提升互补者创新的生成性和稳定性，同时强化互补者学习。提炼数字平台架构设计关键维度，揭示数字平台架构设计对互补者创新的赋能机理，可为数字平台赋能互补者创新提供基于架构设计的新思路。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	梅景瑶
	郑刚
	朱凌

关键词 ：数字平台, 赋能, 互补者创新, 架构设计

收稿日期: 2020-07-23 修回日期: 2020-08-18

ZTFLH:

F124.3

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目（72002200）

作者简介: 梅景瑶（1990—），女，浙江金华人，博士，浙江工业大学管理学院讲师，研究方向为平台战略、数字创新和创业管理；郑刚（1975—），男，山东泰安人，博士，浙江大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为技术创新与创业管理；朱凌（1977—），女，河南新乡人，博士，浙江大学中国科教战略研究院研究员，研究方向为科教管理与工程教育。

引用本文:

梅景瑶,郑刚,朱凌. 数字平台如何赋能互补者创新——基于架构设计视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(12): 1-8.
Mei Jingyao,Zheng Gang,Zhu Ling. How Can Digital Platforms Enable Complementors to Innovate. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2021, 38(12): 1-8.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070762 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2021/V38/I12/1

[1] GAWER A.Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework[J].Research policy,2014,43(7): 1239-1249.
[2] JACOBIDES M G,CENNAMO C,GAWER A.Towards a theory of ecosystems[J].Strategic Management Journal,2018,39(8): 2255-2276.
[3] SAADATMAND F,LINDGREN R,SCHULTZE U.Configurations of platform organizations:implications for complementor engagement[J].Research Policy,2019,48(8): 103770.
[4] TIWANA A.Platform desertion by app developers[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2016,32(4): 40-77.
[5] BALDWIN C Y,WOODARD C J.The architecture of platforms: a unified view[EB/OL]. Harvard business school finance working paper No.09-034,2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1265155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155.
[6] CENNAMO C.Building the value of next-generation platforms: the paradox of diminishing returns[J].Journal of Management,2018,44(8): 3038-3069.
[7] TIWANA A,KONSYNSKI B,BUSH A A.Research commentary—platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture,governance,and environmental dynamics[J].Information Systems Research,2010,21(4): 675-687.
[8] THOMAS L D W,AUTIO E,GANN D M.Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context[J].Academy of management perspectives,2014,28(2): 198-219.
[9] GAWER A.Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services[J].Platforms,Markets and Innovation,2009,45: 57.
[10] GHAZAWNEH A,HENFRIDSSON O.Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model[J].Information Systems Journal,2013,23(2): 173-192.
[11] 吕一博,蓝清,韩少杰.开放式创新生态系统的成长基因——基于 iOS,Android 和 Symbian 的多案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2015,32（5）: 148-160.
[12] GAWER A,CUSUMANO M A.Platform leadership: how Intel,Microsoft,and Cisco drive industry innovation[M].Boston,MA: Harvard Business School Press,2002.
[13] SMEDLUND A,FAGHANKHANI H. Platform orchestration for efficiency,development,and innovation[C].IEEE 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,Hawaii,USA,2015.
[14] 高良谋,张一进.平台理论的演进与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2018,34(1): 123-131.
[15] DHANARAJ C,PARKHE A.Orchestrating innovation networks[J].Academy of Management review,2006,31(3): 659-669.
[16] NAMBISAN S,SAWHNEY M.Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation:evidence from the field[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2011,25(3): 40-57.
[17] YOO Y,HENFRIDSSON O,LYYTINEN K.Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J].Information Systems Research,2010,21(4): 724-735.
[18] YOO Y,BOLAND R J,J R,et al.Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J].Organization Science,2012,23(5): 1398-1408.
[19] HENFRIDSSON O,MATHIASSEN L,SVAHN F.Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames[J].Journal of Information Technology,2014,29(1): 27-43.
[20] 余江,孟庆时,张越,等.数字创新:创新研究新视角的探索及启示[J].科学学研究,2017,35(7):1103-1111.
[21] 姚铮,王笑雨,程越楷.风险投资契约条款设置动因及其作用机理研究[J].管理世界,2011 ，37(2): 127-141.
[22] MILES M B,HUBERMAN A M.Qualitative data analysis[M].Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
[23] YIN R K.Designing case studies[M].London:Sage,2003.
[24] KARHU K,GUSTAFSSON R,LYYTINEN K.Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources:android's five platform forks[J].Information Systems Research,2018,29(2): 479-497.
[25] GHAZAWNEH A,HENFRIDSSON O.A paradigmatic analysis of digital application marketplaces[J].Journal of Information Technology,2015,30(3): 198-208.
[26] SCHILLING M A.Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity[J].Academy of Management Review,2000,25(2): 312-334.
[27] 刘洋,董久钰,魏江.数字创新管理：理论框架与未来研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):198-217, 219.
[28] CIRIELLO R F，RICHTER A， SCHWABE G.Digital Innovation[J].Business & Information Systems Engineering,2018,60(6)：563-569.
[29] WAREHAM J,FOX P B,CANO GINER J L.Technology ecosystem governance[J].Organization Science,2014,25(4): 1195-1215.