李文平,刘莹. 项目申请者“头衔”更有利于科研绩效提升吗——一个面向国家社科基金教育学项目产出的倒序评估[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(21): 18-26.
Li Wenping,Liu Ying. What is the Impact ofthe Applicant's “Title” on the Output Performance of Research Projects. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2020, 37(21): 18-26.
[1] 韩凤芹,史卫.推进科研经费“包干制”试点的几点建议[EB/OL].(2019-7-30)[2019-9-19]http://www.chineseafs.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=23&id=1475.[2] 郭少峰,魏铭言.高抒委员批科研经费分配不公两极分化严重[N].新京报,2009-03-13(002).[3] 周寄中, 杨列勋, 许治.关于国家自然科学基金管理科学部资助项目后评估的研究[J].管理评论, 2007, 19(3):13-19.[4] 尚虎平, 叶杰, 赵盼盼.我国科学研究中的公共财政效率:低效与浪费[J].科学学研究, 2012, 30(10):1476-1487.[5] 李硕豪, 耿乐乐.国家社科基金教育学项目科研绩效研究[J].高等教育研究, 2017, 38(8):42-50.[6] 顾海兵.国家社科基金:应由资助项目转为奖励成果[J].学术界, 2003(1):152-158.[7] 沈文钦.科研经费分配应远离权力和人情[N].人民日报,2010-09-07(009).[8] YIGONG SHI, YI RAO.China's research culture[J].Science,2010,329(5996):1128-1128.[9] GALLO S, THOMPSON L, SCHMALING K , et al.Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications[J].Environment Systems & Decisions, 2018(38):1-14.[10] LANGFELDT L.The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome[J].Social Studies of Science, 2001, 31(6):820-841.[11] 邓国华, 郭杰, 张晓奇.科研项目立项评估机制研究[J].科研管理, 2009(S1):49-55.[12] 刘作仪.浅谈政府资助科研项目的立项评议[J].中国基础科学, 2004, 6(4):44-47.[13] REINHART M .Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine.reliability, fairness, and validity[J].Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3):789-809.[14] 周春喜.基于灰色理论的科研项目立项评审[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2006, 27(4):39-43.[15] 林曾.夕阳无限好——从美国大学教授发表期刊文章看年龄与科研能力之间的关系[J].北京大学教育评论, 2009, 7(1):108-123.[16] FOX M F .Gender,family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists[J].Social Studies of Science, 2005, 35(1):131-150.[17] LEWIS D D R .Determinants of research productivity in higher education[J].Research in Higher Education, 1998, 39(6):607-631.[18] 沈红, 张和平.基于科研论文发表的中国研究型大学正教授的类型及特征[J].复旦教育论坛, 2015, 13(6):54-61.[19] 丁福虎.科研绩效评估的理论与方法[J].科技管理研究, 2000(3):45-48.[20] 尚虎平, 叶杰.绩效导向的科研项目资助:按成果而不是按“自我标榜”拨款 [J].自然辩证法研究, 2011, 27(11):73-81.[21] 头衔.现代汉语词典[M].上海:商务印书馆,1973:1312.[22] HARTMANN I, NEIDHARDT F.Peer review at the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft[J].Scientometrics, 1990, 19(5-6):419-425.[23] BORNMANN L, DANIEL H D.Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review.Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions[J].Scientometrics, 2005, 63(2):297-320.[24] COLE J R , ZUCKERMAN H .Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science[J].Scientific American, 1987, 256(2):119-125.[25] JUNG J.Faculty research productivity in hong kong across academic discipline[J].Higher Education Studies, 2012, 2(4):1-13.[26] CLARK M J, CENTRA J A.Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.D.'s[J].Research in Higher Education,1985, 23(3): 256-269.[27] 王立剑,代秀亮,金蕾,等.人才头衔能否提升科技人才职业成就[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(21):1-8.[28] ROSENBAUM P R, RUBIN D B.Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score[J].The American Statistician, 1985, 39(1):33-38.[29] 胡安宁.社会科学因果推断的理论基础[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2015:195.[30] 亨利·罗索夫斯基.美国校园文化:学生·教授·管理[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1996:209.