新生代员工易变性职业生涯态度对创造力的影响——一个被调节的中介模型

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019100256

科技进步与对策

2020, Vol. 37

Issue (16): 128-134 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2019100256

人才与教育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

新生代员工易变性职业生涯态度对创造力的影响——一个被调节的中介模型

张印轩¹,崔琦²,何燕珍²,唐炎钊²

（1.上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院，上海 200030；2.厦门大学管理学院，福建厦门 361005）

The Effect of Protean Career Attitude of New Generation Employees on Creativity

Zhang Yinxuan¹,Cui Qi²,He Yanzhen²,Tang Yanzhao²

(1. Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China; 2. Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1262 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要当前，“90后”正逐渐进入职场，成为企业主力军，同时，易变性职业生涯态度也已成为新生代员工的主流职业发展倾向。那么，新生代员工易变性职业生涯态度是否有利于促进其在工作中的创造力呢？为此，基于自我决定理论探究两者间的影响机制，基于251份有效样本数据的实证结果表明：易变性职业生涯态度对成就需要、创造力均有显著正向影响；成就需要在易变性职业生涯态度与创造力间起中介作用；组织支持感强化成就需要对创造力的促进作用；组织支持感强化易变性职业生涯态度通过成就需要对创造力的间接影响。研究结论对于政策制定者和管理者具有重要意义，尤其是对于那些拥有较高比例新生代员工的企业,管理实践价值更高。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张印轩
	崔琦
	何燕珍
	唐炎钊

关键词 ：新生代员工, 易变性职业生涯态度, 成就需要, 创造力, 组织支持感

收稿日期: 2020-01-15

ZTFLH:

F272.91

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目（71802033）；福建省社会科学规划重大项目（FJ2018MGCZ010）

作者简介: 张印轩（1992-），男，河北衡水人，上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为人力资源管理、创新创业管理；崔琦（1995-），女，山东潍坊人，厦门大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为人力资源管理；何燕珍（1969-），女，福建福州人，博士，厦门大学管理学院副教授，研究方向为人力资源管理、员工关系管理、薪酬管理；唐炎钊（1968-），男，湖北安陆人，博士，厦门大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为创新创业管理、科技管理。

引用本文:

张印轩,崔琦,何燕珍,唐炎钊. 新生代员工易变性职业生涯态度对创造力的影响——一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(16): 128-134.
Zhang Yinxuan,Cui Qi,He Yanzhen,Tang Yanzhao. The Effect of Protean Career Attitude of New Generation Employees on Creativity. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2020, 37(16): 128-134.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2019100256 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2020/V37/I16/128

[1]张光磊,周金帆.新生代员工的定义与特征研究述评[J].武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(4)：449-454.
[2]A HERRMANN, A HIRSCHI, Y BARUCH. The protean career orientation as predictor of career outcomes: evaluation of incremental validity and mediation effects[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015, 88: 205-214.
[3]WATERS L, BRISCOE J P, HALL D T, et al. Protean career attitudes during unemployment and reemployment: a longitudinal perspective[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2014, 84(3): 405-419.
[4]JON P. BRISCOE, DOUGLAS T HALL, et al. Protean and boundaryless careers: an empirical exploration[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2006, 69: 30-47.
[5]REDONDO R, SPARROW P, HERNANDEZ-LECHUGA G. The effect of protean careers on talent retention: examining the relationship between protean career orientation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit for talented workers[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019（8）: 1-24.
[6]ZALESKA KJ,MENEZES LM DE.Human resources development practices and their association with employee attitudes: between traditional and new careers[J]. Human Relations, 2007, 60(7): 987-1018.
[7]BRISCOE JP,HALL DT.The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: combinations and implications[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2006, 69(1): 4-18.
[8]SUPELI A,CREED PA.The longitudinal relationship between protean career orientation and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention-to-quit[J]. Journal of Career Development, 2016, 43(1): 66-80.
[9]郭文臣,段艳楠.基于挑战与变革视角的新型职业生涯与人力资源管理实践研究[J].管理学报,2013,10(12):1785-1791.
[10]MCCLELLAND,D C Human motivation[M]. London: Cambridge University Press Archive, 1987.
[11]RICH B L, LEPINE J A, CRAWFORD E R. Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(3): 617-635
[12]DOUGLAS THALL. The protean career: a quarter-century journey[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2004, 65(1): 1-13.
[13]JUDITH VOLMER,DANIEL SPURK. Protean and boundaryless career attitudes: elationships with subjective and objective career success[J].Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung, 2011,43(3):207-218.
[14]WIERNIK B M, AND KOSTAL J W. Protean and boundaryless career orientations: a critical review and meta-analysis[J]. J. Couns. Psychol, 2019, 66: 280-307.
[15]AMABILE T M. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988, 10(1): 123-167.
[16]PATEL P C, THORGREN S, WINCENT J. Leadership, passion and performance: a study of job creation projects during the recession[J]. British Journal of Management, 2015, 26 (2) :211-224.
[17]M VANSTEENKISTE, J SIMONS, W LENS, et al. Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 87(2): 246-260.
[18]SCHULTHEISS O C,U S WIEMERS, AND O T WOLF.Implicit need for achievement predicts attenuated cortisol responses to difficult tasks[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2014, 48(5): 84-92.
[19]MCCLELLAND D C. How motives, skills, and values determine what people do[J]. American Psychologist, 1985, 40(7): 812.
[20]FARMER S M,TIERNEY P,KUNG-MCINTYRE K. Employee creativity in Taiwan:an application of role identity theory[J].Academy of Management Journal,2003, 46(5): 618-630.
[21]ZHOU J, GEORGE J M. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(4): 682-696.
[22]HALBESLEBEN J R B, NEVEU J P, PAUSTIAN-UNDERDAHL S C, et al. Getting to the "COR": understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1334-1364.
[23]SOUTHWICK S M, CHARNEY D S. The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression[J]. Science, 2012, 338(6103): 79-82.
[24]BRISLIN R W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[M].Boston:Handbook of Cross-culturalPsychology,1980: 389-444.
[25]HAIR J F, BLACK W C, BABIN BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed) [M].New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2009.
[26]STEERS R M B D. A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1976, 9(2): 251-266.
[27]ADAM GRANT. Originals: how non-conformists move the world[M]. New York: Penguin Books, 2016.
[28]WAYNE S, SHORE L, LINDEN R. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: asocial exchange perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(1): 82-111.
[29]吴江华,顾琴轩,梁冰倩.共享领导与员工创造力:一个被调节的中介模型[J].中国人力资源开发,2017(11):43-52.
[30]宋志刚,顾琴轩.创造性人格与员工创造力:一个被调节的中介模型研究[J].心理科学,2015,38(3):700-707.
[31]LITTLE T D, CUNNINGHAM W A, SHAHAR G, et al. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2002, 9: 151-173.
[32]BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51: 1173-1182.
[33]WU W. Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: the mediating role of information sharing[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45: 122-146.
[34]ZHAO X, LYNCH J G, CHEN Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 37: 197-206.
[35]HAYES A F. An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression based approach[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.