社会资本组件对个体双元创新的作用机制研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050686

科技进步与对策

2017, Vol. 34

Issue (6): 20-25 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050686

科技管理创新

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

社会资本组件对个体双元创新的作用机制研究

林筠,韩鑫

西安理工大学经济与管理学院，陕西西安 710054

Research on Mechanism of Social Capital Components upon Individual Ambidextrous Innovation

Lin Jun,Han Xin

School of Economic and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054, China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (14)

全文: PDF (999 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要社会资本对个体双元创新的影响在学术界受到重视，厘清社会资本与个体双元创新的关系对有效提升企业创新能力至关重要。基于社会资本的3个维度提出3对组件(Components)，即结构维度的结合网络与桥接网络、关系维度的普遍信任与特殊信任以及认知维度的共同愿景与组织多样化，探究每对组件对个体利用性创新与探索性创新的差异性影响，分析各组件缓解个体因兼顾利用性与探索性创新所面临时间冲突困境的平衡作用，构建双元兼顾的一致型和适应型社会资本理论架构，为管理者善用和慎用社会资本组件、提升员工双元创新能力提供理论依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	林筠
	韩鑫

关键词 ：社会资本组件, 个体创新, 利用性创新, 探索性创新

收稿日期: 2016-09-23

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目（14BGL025）；陕西省软科学研究项目（2015KRM047）

通讯作者: 林筠

作者简介: 林筠（1963-），女,陕西西安人，西安理工大学经济与管理学院教授，研究方向为创新管理、人力资源管理；韩鑫（1992-），男，陕西商洛人，西安理工大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新管理、人力资源管理。

引用本文:

林筠,韩鑫. 社会资本组件对个体双元创新的作用机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(6): 20-25.
Lin Jun,Han Xin. Research on Mechanism of Social Capital Components upon Individual Ambidextrous Innovation. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(6): 20-25.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050686 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2017/V34/I6/20

［1］JANSEN J J, TEMPELAAR M P, BOSCH F A J VAN DEN, et al. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms［J］. Organization Science,2009,20(4):797-811.
［2］MARCH J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning［J］. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.
［3］HE Z P, WONG P K， EXPLORATION VS. Exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis［J］. Organization Science,2004,15(4):481-494.
［4］ROGAN M, MORS L. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations［J］. Organization Science,2014,25(6):1860-1877.
［5］SIDHU J S, VOLBERDA H W, COMMANDEUR H R. Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: some empirical evidence［J］. Journal of Management Studies,2004,41(6):913-932.
［6］ANDRIOPOULOS C, LEWIS M W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation［J］. Organization Science,2009,20(4):696-717.
［7］KELLER T, WEIBLER J. Behind managers′ ambidexterity-studying personality traits, leadership and environmental conditions associated with exploration and exploitation［J］. Schmalenbach Business Review,2014,66(3):309-333.
［8］MOM T J, VAN B, VOLBERDA H W. Investigating man-agers’exploration and exploitation activities: the influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows［J］. Journal of Management Studies,2007,44(6):910-931.
［9］KAUPPILA O P, MICHIEL P T. The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees′ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers′ leadership［J］. Journal of Management Studies,2016,52(98):162-168.
［10］SIMON F, TELLIER A. Reconsidering ambidexterity at the individual level:a social network perspective［J］. Advances in Strategic Management,2011,28:393-428.
［11］VILLENA V H, REVILLA E, CHOI T Y. The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships:a social capital perspective［J］. Journal of Operations Management,2011,29(6):561-576.
［12］GIMA K A, MURRAY J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development:a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China［J］. Journal of International Marketing,2013,15(2):1-29.
［13］GIBSON C B, BIRKINSHAW J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity［J］. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(2):209-226.
［14］SPEKTOR F M, GINO F, ARGOTE L. Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration［J］. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2011,116(2):229-240.
［15］AMBOS T C, MAKELA K, BIRKINSHAW J, et al. When does university research get commercialized? creating ambidexterity in research institutions［J］. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(8):1424-1447.
［16］BIRKINSHAW J, GUPTA K. Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies［J］. Academy of Management Perspectives,2013,27(4):287-298.
［17］JAKOBSEN S E, LORENTZEN T. Between bonding and bridging: regional differences in innovative collaboration in Norway［J］. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift,2015,69(2):80-89.
［18］VAN MIERLO H, KLEINGELD A. Goals, strategies, and group performance: some limits of goal setting in groups［J］. Small Group Research,2010,41(5):524-555.
［19］NOOTEBOOM B. A cognitive theory of the firm: learning, governance and dynamic capabilities［J］. Innovation Journal,2009,38(8):661-662.
［20］KANG S C, SNELL S A. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: extending the human resource architecture ［J］. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(1):236-256.
［21］NAHAPIET J, GHOSHAL S. Social capital,intellectual capitai, and the organizational advantage［J］. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(2):242-266.
［22］TIWANA A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? an empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity［J］. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:251-273.
［23］BERARDO R. Bridging and bonding capital in two-mode collaboration networks［J］. Policy Studies Journal,2014,42(2):197-225.
［24］HENTTONEN H, JOHANSON J E, JANHONEN M. Work-team bonding and bridging social networks, team identity and performance effectiveness［J］. Personnel Review,2014,43(3):330-349.
［25］HAN J Y, HOVAV A. To bridge or to bond? diverse social connections in an IS project team［J］. International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(3):378-390.
［26］GUNDELACH B, TRAUNMULLER R. Beyond generalised trust: norms of reciprocity as an alternative form of social capital in an assimilationist integration regime［J］. Political Studies,2014,62(3):596-617.
［27］WANG C L, RAFIQ M. Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms［J］. British Journal of Management,2014, 25(1):58-76.
［28］MCGRATH R G, VENKATARAMAN S, MACMILLAN I C. The advantage chain:antecedents to rents from internal corporate ventures［J］. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(5):351-369.
［29］刘新民，王垒，李垣. 企业家类型、控制机制与创新方式选择研究［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理,2013，34(8):102-110.
［30］RAISCH S, BIRKINSHAW J, PROBST G, TUSHMAN M L. Organizational ambidexterity:balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance［J］. Organization Science,2009,20(4):685-695.
［31］MIHALACHE O R, JANSEN J J, BOSCH F A J VAN DEN, et al. Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity:a moderated mediation framework［J］. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2014,8(2) :128-148.
［32］THONGPAPANL N, CLERCQ D, DIMOV D. An investigation of the performance consequences of alignment and adaptability:contingency effects of decision autonomy and shared responsibility［J］. R&D Management,2012,42(1):14-30．［33］PORTES A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modem sociolog［J］. Annual Review of Sociology,1998, 24:1-24.
［34］OSTERGAARD C R, TIMMERMANS B, KRISTINSSON K. Does a different view create something new? the effect of employee diversity on innovation［J］. Research Policy,2011,40(3):500-509.
［35］KANG S C, SNELL S A. Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning:a framework for human resource management［J］. Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(1):65-92.