Which Kind of Followers Will Be Treated as Insiders by Leaders? The Impact of Implicit Followership Theories on L-LMX
Zhu Zhenbing1,Luo Wenhao2,Cao Yuankun3
1.School of Business, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013,China;2.School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144,China;3.Research Center of Cluster and Enterprise Development, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
祝振兵,罗文豪,曹元坤. 领导会视谁为圈内人?内隐追随与领导-成员交换关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(11): 140-146.
Zhu Zhenbing,Luo Wenhao,Cao Yuankun. Which Kind of Followers Will Be Treated as Insiders by Leaders? The Impact of Implicit Followership Theories on L-LMX. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(11): 140-146.
[1]杨晓, 谭乐. 团队领导-成员交换关系:内涵、测量、影响因素与作用机制[J]. 科技进步与对策,2016,33(3):156-160.
[2]LIDEN R C, SPARROWE R T, WAYNE S J. Leader-member exchange theory: the past and potential for the future[M]//G FERRIS. Research in personnel and human resource management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997.
[3]ROCKSTUHL T, DULEBOHN J H, ANG S, et al. Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture: a meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97(6): 1097-1130.
[4]DULEBOHN J H, BOMMER W H, LIDEN R C, et al. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(6): 1715-1759.
[5]GRAEN G B, UHL-BIEN M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995(6):219-247.
[6]VAN GILS S, VAN QUAQUEBEKE N, VAN KNIPPENBERG D. The x-factor: on the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader-member exchange agreement[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 19(3):333-363.
[7]SCHYNS B, DAY D. Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 19(1):1-29.
[8]GERSTNER C R, DAY D V. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1997(82):827-844.
[9]SIN H P, NAHRGANG J D, MORGESON F P. Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: an examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(4): 1048-1057.
[10]WAYNE S J, FERRIS G R. Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(5): 487-499.
[11]SY T. What do you think of followers[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(1): 73-84.
[12]JUNKER N M, VAN DICK R. Implicit theories in organizational settings: a systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(6): 1154-1173.
[13]SHONDRICK S J, LORD R G. Implicit leadership and followership theories: dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, leader-follower processes[M]// HODGKINSON G P, FORD J K. International review of industrial and organizational psychology.Chichester:Wiley & Sons,2010.
[14]孔茗, 钱小军. 被领导者“看好”的员工其行为也一定好吗?——内隐追随对员工行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1162-1171.
[15]曹元坤,祝振兵. 内隐追随理论:概念、测量、前因及后果[J]. 心理科学进展,2015, 23(2): 280-288.
[16]WHITELEY P, SY T, JOHNSON S K. Leaders′ conceptions of followers: implications for naturally occurring pygmalion effects[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23(5): 822-834.
[17]彭坚, 冉雅璇, 康勇军. 事必躬亲还是权力共享?——内隐追随理论视角下领导者授权行为研究[J]. 心理科学, 2016, 39(7): 1197-1203.
[18]DERLER A, WEIBLER J. The ideal employee: context and leaders′ implicit follower theories[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2014, 35(5): 386-409.
[19]BARSALOU L W. Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,1985, 11(2): 629-654.
[20]VAN QUAQUEBEKE N, GRAF M M, ECKLOFF T. What do leaders have to live up to? contrasting the effects of central tendency versus ideal-based leader prototypes in leader categorization processes[J]. Leadership, 2014, 10(2), 191-217.
[21]MARTIN R, EPITROPAKI O. Role of organizational identification on implicit leadership theories (ILTs), transformational leadership and work attitudes[J].Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2001,22(4): 247-262.
[22]MACRAE C N, BODENHAUSEN G V. Social cognition: thinking categorically about others[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2000, 51(3): 93-120.
[23]EPITROPAKI O, MARTIN R. From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(4): 659-676.
[24]NG K, ANG S, CHAN K. Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(4): 733-743.
[25]VAN QUAQUEBEKE N, VAN KNIPPENBERG D, BRODBECK F C. More than meets the eye: the role of subordinates′self-perceptions in leader categorization processes[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(2): 367-382.
[26]KARASEK R A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24(6): 285-308.
[27]HUI C, LAW K S, CHEN Z X. A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: a Chinese case[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 77(5): 3-21.
[28]ZHANG Z, WANG M, SHI J. Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: the mediating role of leader-member exchange[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1): 111-130.
[29]UHL-BIEN M, RIGGIO R E, LOWEC K B, et al. Followership theory: a review and research agenda[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(3): 84-104.
[30]刘雪峰,张志学.认知闭合需要研究评述[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(1): 51-55.
[31]PAYNE B K, GAWRONSKI B. A history of implicit social cognition where is it coming from? where is it now? where is it going[M]//GAWRONSKI B, PAYNE B K. Handbook of implicit social cognition: measurement, theory, and applications.New York:The Guiord Press, 2009.
[32]SHANOCK L R, BARAN B E, GENTRY W A, et al. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2010, 25(4): 543-554.
[33]MA L, QU Q. Differentiation in leader-member exchange: a hierarchical linear modeling approach[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(2): 733-744.