积极心理学视角下优势匹配感对员工创新行为的影响研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100048

科技进步与对策

2017, Vol. 34

Issue (16): 148-154 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100048

人才与教育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

积极心理学视角下优势匹配感对员工创新行为的影响研究

李悦¹,王怀勇²

1.华东师范大学公共管理学院，上海 200062；2.上海师范大学心理学系，上海 200234

Investigating the Effect of Perceived Organizational Support of Strength Use on Employee Innovative Behavior from the Perspective of Positive Psychology

Li Yue¹,Wang Huaiyong²

1.School of Public Administration East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;2.Department of Psychology Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1191 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于积极心理学视角，检验优势匹配感对员工创新行为的影响，探讨促进聚焦和活力的中介作用，以及双元领导风格在其中的调节作用。研究结果表明，优势匹配感对员工创新行为有显著正向影响，促进聚集和活力起着中介作用，前者是优势匹配感影响员工创新行为的动力机制，后者是优势匹配感影响员工创新行为的情绪机制。双元领导风格在优势匹配感和员工创新行为关系间具有调节作用，双元领导风格会增强优势匹配感对员工创新行为的正向影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李悦
	王怀勇

关键词 ：优势匹配感, 促进聚焦, 活力, 双元领导风格, 员工创新行为

收稿日期: 2017-01-05

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（14YJC630075）

通讯作者: 李悦

作者简介: 李悦（1983-），男，四川雅安人，博士，华东师范大学公共管理学院讲师，研究方向为组织创新、组织变革；王怀勇（1982-），男，河南周口人，博士，上海师范大学心理学系副教授，研究方向为组织公平、组织决策。

引用本文:

李悦,王怀勇. 积极心理学视角下优势匹配感对员工创新行为的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(16): 148-154.
Li Yue,Wang Huaiyong. Investigating the Effect of Perceived Organizational Support of Strength Use on Employee Innovative Behavior from the Perspective of Positive Psychology. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(16): 148-154.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016100048 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2017/V34/I16/148

［1］WOERKOM M V,BAKKER A B,NISHII L H.Accumulative job demands and support for strength use:fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,2016,101(1): 141.
［2］KEENAN E M,MOSTERT K.Perceived organisational support for strengths use:the factorial validity and reliability of a new scale in the banking industry［J］.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology,2013,39(1):1-12.
［3］WOERKOM M V,MEYERS M C.My strengths count! effects of a strengths-based psychological climate on positive affect and job performance［J］.Human Resource Management,2014,54:81-103.
［4］WOERKOM M V,OERLEMANS W,BAKKER A B.Strengths use and work engagement: a weekly diary study［J］.European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology,2015,25(3):384-397.
［5］ZACHER H,ROSING K.Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation［J］.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,2015,36(1): 54-68.
［6］ROSING K,FRESE M,BAUSCH A.Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship:ambidextrous leadership［J］.The Leadership Quarterly,2011,22(5): 956-974.
［7］MEYERS M C,VAN W M,DE REUVER R S,et al.Enhancing psychological capital and personal growth initiative:working on strengths or deficiencies.［J］.Journal of Counseling Psychology,2015,62(1):50-62.
［8］JANSSEN O,YPEREN N W V.Employees' goal orientations,the quality of leader-member exchange,and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction［J］.Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(47):368-384.
［9］KAUPPILA O,TEMPELAAR M P.The social‐cognitive underpinnings of employees' ambidextrous behavior and the supportive role of group managers' leadership［J］.Journal of Management Studies,2016,52(98):162-168.
［10］李悦,王重鸣.程序公正对创新行为的影响:积极情绪的中介效应研究［J］.软科学,2012,26(2):79-83.
［11］MOM T J M,FOURNE S P L,JANSEN J J P.Managers’ work experience,ambidexterity,and performance:the contingency role of the work context［J］.Human Resource Management,2015,54(S1):s133–s153.
［12］HIGGINS E T.Beyond pleasure and pain［J］.American Psychologist,1997,52(12):1280-300.
［13］GORMAN C A,MERIAC J P,OVERSTREET B L,et al.A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network:work-related antecedents and consequences［J］.Journal of Vocational Behavior,2012,80(1):160-172.
［14］WANG J,LEE A Y.The role of regulatory focus in preference construction［J］.Journal of Marketing Research,2006,43(1):28-38.
［15］LANAJ K,CHANG C H,JOHNSON R E.Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis［J］.Psychological Bulletin,2012,138(5):998-1034.
［16］QIN Z,GILES H,HELEN S.Context matters:combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2012,33(33):894-909.
［17］TUNCDOGAN A,BOSCH F V D,VOLBERDA H.Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders' exploration and exploitation activities［J］.Leadership Quarterly,2015,26(5):568-572.
［18］HENKER N,SONNENTAG S,UNGER D.Transformational leadership and employee creativity:the mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement［J］.Journal of Business & Psychology,2015,30(2):235-247.
［19］SPREITZER G,SUTCLIFFE K,DUTTON J,et al.A socially embedded model of thriving at work［J］.Organization Science,2005,16(5):537-549.
［20］KARK R,CARMELI A.Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30(6):785-804.
［21］RYAN R M,BERNSTEIN J H,WARREN B K.Weekends,Work,and well-being:psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood,vitality,and physical symptoms［J］.Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology,2010,29(1):95-122.
［22］QUINN R W,SPREITZER G M,LAM C F.Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: exploring the critical role of resources［J］.Academy of Management Annals,2012,6(1):1-60.
［23］LINLEY P A,HARRINGTON S.Playing to your strengths［J］.Psychologist,2006,19(2):86-89.
［24］BROWN S L,NESSE R M,VINOKUR A D,et al.Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality［J］.Psychological Science,2003,14(4):320-7.
［25］AMABILE T M,BARSADE S G,MUELLER J S,et al.Affect and creativity at work［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(3):367–403.
［26］HAMILTON R,VOHS K D,SELLIER A L,et al.Being of two minds:switching mindsets exhausts self-regulatory resources［J］.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,2011,115(1):13-24.
［27］LEWIS M W,ANDRIOPOULOS C,SMITH W K.Paradoxical Leadership to enable strategic agility［J］.California Management Review,2014,56(3):58-77.
［28］ZACHER H,WILDEN R G.A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation［J］.Journal of occupational and organizational psychology,2014,87(4): 813-820.
［29］CARMELI A,HALEVI M Y.How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity:the moderating role of contextual ambidexterity［J］.Leadership Quarterly,2009,20(2):207-218.
［30］CROPANZANO R,MITCHELL M S.Social exchange theory:an Interdisciplinary review［J］.Journal of Management,2005,31(6):874-900.
［31］FERRIS D L,JOHNSON R E,ROSEN C C,et al.When is success not satisfying? integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,2013,98(2):342-53.
［32］PORATH C,SPREITZER G,GIBSON C,et al.Thriving at work:toward its measurement,construct validation,and theoretical refinement［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2012,33(2): 250-275.
［33］JANSEN J J P,KOSTOPOULOS K C,MIHALACHE O R,et al.A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity:the contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours［J］.Journal of Management Studies,2016,DOI:10.1111/joms.12183.
［34］WELBOURNE T M,EREZ A.The role-based performance scale: validity analysis of a theory-based measure［J］.Academy of Management Journal,1997,41(5):págs.540-555.
［35］李永鑫,周海龙,田艳辉.真实型领导影响员工工作投入的多重中介效应［J］.心理科学,2014,37(3):716-722.
［36］BARON R M,KENNY D A.The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations［J］.Journal of personality and social psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
［37］方杰,温忠麟,张敏强,等.基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析［J］.心理科学,2014,37(3):735-741.
［38］ZHOU J.Core self-evaluation and career decision self-efficacy:a mediation model of value orientations［J］.Personality & Individual Differences,2015,86:450-454.
［39］TIERNEY P,FARMER S M.Creative self-efficacy:its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance［J］.Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(6):1137-1148.